CLK:掌管剪接的四把激酶,和一条走了二十年还没到终点的成药路
下划线 = 中文容易“变味”或丢信息的词句:红线带编号 = 16 条注释卡(悬停看、点击跳转)。这是一篇 97k 字符的综述,本页只做择要精译:摘要与引言全译,结构、剪接、疾病、抑制剂四条线各取骨架,讨论与展望按原意压缩。全文中译会把读者淹死,但把“为什么这个靶点至今没成药”讲清楚,比逐节复述有用。英文原文附于文末,想要细节请直接跳过去。
作者:Mengqiu Song#、Luping Pang#、Mengmeng Zhang、Yingzi Qu、Kyle Vaughn Laster、Zigang Dong(# 表示同等贡献)
出处:Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy 2023;8:148(Nature 出版集团,开放获取)
DOI:10.1038/s41392-023-01409-4 PMID:37029108
译自英文原题:Cdc2-like kinases: structure, biological function, and therapeutic targets for diseases。本页为择要精译:摘要与引言按原文逐段译出;结构、剪接调控两节择要;疾病部分按病种保留机制与关键数字;抑制剂部分保留化合物名、靶点与临床阶段;讨论与展望按原意压缩。文献编号(上标 [n])一律省略,需要查证请对照文末英文原文。
先说结论,省得你在这篇九万多字符的综述里迷路:CLK 是四个同源的双特异性激酶,它们做的事很单一——给 SR 蛋白的 RS 域上磷酸基团,从而决定一条 pre-mRNA 最终剪成哪个版本。这件事一旦错位,神经退行、肌营养不良、炎症、病毒感染、肿瘤都能扯上关系;所以过去二十年,化学家和临床医生一直在找能抑制 CLK 的小分子。找到了一堆,IC50 从 1 nM 到几百 nM 都有,也真的有几个进了临床试验。但从第一个工具化合物 TG003 算起,跑得最远的那个分子也还停在 III 期。这篇综述的价值,不在于它列了多少化合物,而在于它把这条“靶点很硬、药很难成”的链条完整摆在了桌面上。
摘要(全译)
CLK(Cdc2 样激酶,Cdc2-like kinases)属于双特异性蛋白激酶家族,在调控转录本剪接中起关键作用:它们磷酸化 SR 蛋白(SRSF1–12)、催化剪接体分子机器,并调节非剪接蛋白的活性或表达。这些过程的失调与多种疾病相关,包括神经退行性疾病、杜氏肌营养不良(DMD)、炎症性疾病、病毒复制以及肿瘤。因此,CLK 被认为是潜在的治疗靶点,人们已投入大量努力去发现强效的 CLK 抑制剂。尤其值得关注的是,评估小分子 Lorecivivint 在膝关节骨关节炎患者中、以及 Cirtuvivint 与 Silmitasertib 在不同晚期肿瘤中活性的临床试验,已经被作为治疗用途加以研究。本综述系统梳理了 CLK 的结构与生物学功能及其在多种人类疾病中的作用,并总结了相关抑制剂在治疗中的意义。我们的讨论强调了 CLK 研究的最新进展,为多种人类疾病的临床治疗铺路。
关键词(原文未列,按正文主题归纳):CLK 家族;SR 蛋白;可变剪接;CMGC 激酶;小分子抑制剂;临床试验。
摘要只有一段,但它把整篇综述的骨架交待得很清楚:结构 → 功能 → 疾病 → 抑制剂 → 临床。你以后写综述摘要,可以照着这个顺序抄结构,而不是抄句子。另外注意它用的动词——“被认为是潜在靶点”(have been considered as potential therapeutic targets)、“已经被作为治疗用途加以研究”(have been investigated for therapeutic usage)——审慎得近乎冷淡。一篇讨论“成药”的综述,摘要里没有一句“有效”,这本身就是信息。
引言:CLK 是什么
Cdc2 样激酶(CLK)属于双特异性蛋白激酶(DSK)家族,这类激酶能催化底物丝氨酸、苏氨酸和酪氨酸三个位点的磷酸化——注意,是同一类酶对三种残基都能下手,这正是“双特异性”这个中文名最容易被误解的地方(见注 1)。CLK 家族由四个同源蛋白组成(CLK1–4),四个成员在真核生物中都高度保守。在激酶分类上,CLK 被归入 CMGC 组——即 CDK(细胞周期蛋白依赖性激酶)、MAPK(丝裂原活化蛋白激酶)、GSK(糖原合成酶激酶)与 CDK 样激酶这一组;它们共用同一个 ATP 辅因子,催化下游蛋白底物的磷酸化。
CLK 的激酶结构域里含有一个“EHLAMMERILG”基序,位于每个家族成员的 C 端一侧,因此 CLK 蛋白也被称为 LAMMER 家族。CLK 分布在细胞质与细胞核中,但主要通过磷酸化剪接因子中富含丝氨酸/精氨酸(Ser-Arg)的域,在核内发挥功能。一般来说,CLK 对下游底物的磷酸化由对通用共识序列 R-x-x-S/T 的识别所驱动。在此基础上,CLK 控制 pre-mRNA 的剪接,产生不同的蛋白异构体,这些异构体在细胞生长与存活中起关键作用。
SR 蛋白(SRSF1–12)是 CLK 研究得最清楚的一类底物:它们结合 pre-mRNA 以及相关的剪接体组分,帮助剪接体装配。被 CLK 磷酸化而激活的 SR 蛋白参与可变剪接,并催化剪接过程。反过来,有功能的 SR 蛋白随后会被磷酸酶去磷酸化,而这一步是剪接后的 mRNA 从细胞核输出所必需的。原文这句话不长,但它描述的其实是一个循环:磷酸化让 SR 蛋白进场装配剪接体,去磷酸化让它退场、放行 mRNA。任何一头卡住,细胞都会难受。
四个成员里,CLK1 的结构与功能被研究得最透。CLK1 又名 STY,已被证明会在 Ser/Thr/Tyr 残基上自磷酸化,并磷酸化底物的 Ser 残基。CLK1 的催化结构域位于 C 端,N 端则含有 Ser-Arg 重复序列,负责介导与相应底物的相互作用。CLK1 的激酶结构域不仅能磷酸化 Ser-Arg 二肽,也能作用于 Ser-Lys 与 Ser-Pro 位点——这一点常被忽略,因为它意味着 CLK 的底物谱比“只认 RS 域”要宽。
功能上,CLK1 在核内与 SR 蛋白共定位,并促进 SRSF1 蛋白的构象变化;这一过程随后阻断 SRSF1 从细胞核向细胞质的输出,并增强 SRSF1 与初级转录本的结合。而当 SRSF1 的磷酸化丢失时,超过 100 个基因的可变剪接受损,导致基因表达紊乱。CLK1 的丰度还会随细胞周期周期性变化,在 G2/M 期达到峰值,说明 CLK1 的表达与细胞周期进程密切相关——这句话在后面的肿瘤部分会被反复用到。
与 CLK1 类似,CLK2、CLK3、CLK4 也通过调控剪接参与细胞生长与疾病发生。此外,人 CLK2 被发现通过参与脂肪酸氧化与生酮,在脂肪肝病中起作用;CLK3 因其在成熟精子中高表达,被认为在受精过程中扮演关键角色;CLK4 则被指在应激撤除后调节 pre-mRNA 的内含子保留型剪接。四个成员各自的“私活”不同,这是后面讨论选择性抑制剂时必须记住的前提:CLK1 和 CLK4 抑制剂的表型,不能互相替代。
综述开篇这一段值得单独拎出来看:它没有急着讲疾病,而是先把底物、共识序列、亚细胞定位、以及四个成员的差异摆清楚。写综述的正确顺序是先建坐标系,再放标本;很多中文综述反过来,一上来就是“CLK 在肿瘤中高表达,因此是潜在靶点”,读者不知道 CLK 是什么,也就无法判断“高表达”意味着什么。
CLK 的结构与剪接调控
结构上,人 CLK 的四个成员共享高度保守的拓扑。每个蛋白都由一段柔性的、无结构的 N 端区域(约 140–300 个残基)和一个保守的激酶结构域组成。别小看这段“无结构”的 N 端:它的序列与它们的目标底物——SR 蛋白——里的 RS 域相似,因此像一座桥,介导自身激酶结构域与 SR 蛋白 RS 域之间的相互作用。把 CLK1 的这段 N 端去掉,SRSF1 的 RS 域磷酸化水平会显著下降。这个观察说明,CLK1 的内在无序区及其介导的蛋白-蛋白接触,不仅增强了与下游蛋白的结合,也促进了底物的超磷酸化。
相比之下,CLK 的催化结构域高度有序,呈现典型的激酶折叠:一个 N 叶(N-lobe)与一个 C 叶(C-lobe),由一个铰链区桥接,中间形成保守的 ATP 结合口袋。N 叶由三条 β 链、一个 α 螺旋和两条额外的 β 链组成。C 叶则带有三个定义 CLK 家族的保守结构插入:一个 β-发夹插入、一个 LAMMER 域、以及一个 MAPK 样插入。位于 C 叶顶部的延伸 β-发夹插入在 CLK 家族中高度保守,残基范围为 CLK1 的 297–319、CLK2 的 299–321、CLK3 的 440–462、CLK4 的 295–317。另一个标志性基序是恒定的 “EHLAMMERILG” 区(CLK1 386–396、CLK2 388–398、CLK3 529–539、CLK4 384–394),位于 C 叶底部,家族名“LAMMER 蛋白激酶”即由此而来。最后一个是共有的 MAPK 样插入,其组织方式为“螺旋-链-链-螺旋”,而在 MAPK 蛋白家族的同一区域,两条 β 链被一个环所取代。这些 CLK 特有的序列基序,很可能对其底物识别与结合特异性很重要。
把所有已解析的人 CLK 晶体结构叠合起来可以看到,它们的激酶结构域拓扑非常相似。因此,CLK 抑制剂通常是 ATP 模拟物(ATP mimetics),通过结合在 ATP 口袋内发挥作用。抑制剂一般含有芳香杂环,这些环被夹在 N 叶的疏水残基(CLK1 的 L167、V175)与 C 叶的疏水残基(CLK1 的 L295、V324)之间,很像 ATP 的腺嘌呤环的结合方式。抑制剂环系内部的化学修饰,则与铰链区的主链原子形成氢键。
C 叶里的 DFG 序列基序,对抑制剂与底物的结合都很关键。有意思的是,DFG-1 位残基在 CLK1、CLK2、CLK4 中是缬氨酸(Val),而在 CLK3 中被替换成侧链更短的丙氨酸(Ala),这导致 CLK3 的结合腔变大。正是这个细微差异,使得早期开发的选择性抑制剂多针对 CLK1、CLK2、CLK4,而不是 CLK3。进一步的静电表面计算显示,口袋内的电荷分布也各有不同,这是选择性的另一个重要因素,做药物设计时应当考虑。一句话总结:CLK1/2/4 与 CLK3 在 ATP 口袋上有一个“一残基”的差别,这既是机会,也是陷阱——机会在于可以做出亚型选择性,陷阱在于很多文献里“CLK 抑制剂”其实并不均匀地抑制四个成员。
再看功能这一侧。可变剪接是一个生物学现象,它让单个基因产生多种 mRNA 与蛋白产物。目前已知五种主要剪接类型:外显子跳跃(ES)、内含子保留(IR)、互斥外显子(MXE)、可变 5′ 剪接位点(A5SS)与可变 3′ 剪接位点(A3SS)。剪接体是完成 pre-mRNA 剪接所必需的酶学机器,它的形成是小核核糖核蛋白(snRNP,包括 U1、U2、U4/U6 和 U5)与 150 多种额外蛋白之间复杂相互作用的结果。此外,多种 RNA 结合蛋白(RBP)参与可变剪接,包括 SR 蛋白与异质核糖核蛋白(hnRNP)家族蛋白。
CLK 与 SR 蛋白特异性激酶(SRPK)主要负责磷酸化 SR 蛋白家族(SRSF1–12)的 RS 二肽重复域。SR 蛋白一旦被磷酸化,就调控 RNA 剪接并参与多种生理功能。此外,其他剪接相关因子(如 RBM 蛋白)也参与通过可变剪接产生成熟 mRNA 的过程。顺带一个数字:约 95% 的人类基因通过外显子的差异包含,转录出多种 mRNA 异构体。
下面这段是“剪接调控”这一节的骨架,值得逐句读。人 CLK1 通过磷酸化 SR 家族蛋白各自的 C 端,调控这些蛋白的细胞分布。其中 SRSF1 是研究得最清楚的下游底物:CLK1 的 N 端通过 SRSF1 的 RS 域与之相互作用,而这一步是 SRSF1 超磷酸化所必需的;超磷酸化又进一步促进 SRSF1 结合其 RNA 靶标 Ron ESE(一段按 SRSF1 外显子增强子序列设计的 RNA 寡聚体)。在胃癌与患者来源异种移植(PDX)样本的磷酸化蛋白组学分析中,SRSF2 在肿瘤样本里呈超磷酸化;用抑制剂或 siRNA 抑制 CLK1,会下调 CLK1 依赖的 SRSF2 剪接活性,进而降低胃癌细胞的增殖、侵袭与迁移。
SRSF1 同样是 CLK2 的底物,其磷酸化状态与 CLK2 的表达密切相关,而这对 SRSF1 的核定位与剪接功能是必需的。另有一条 CLK3–HMGA2 可变剪接轴,被发现在体外与体内促进人造血干细胞(HSC)的干性潜能:CLK3 以 SRSF1 依赖的方式促进 HMGA2-L 外显子跳跃,从而强化 HSC 特有的程序;把 HMGA2-L 外显子 4 中的 SRSF1 结合基序突变掉,CLK3 经 SRSF1 调控的 HMGA2-L 跳跃就被破坏,这为 CLK3 与 SRSF1 之间提供了直接的分子联系。此外,在胰岛素刺激下,CLK1 磷酸化 SRSF4 与 SRSF6,导致 PKCβII 的 pre-mRNA 发生可变剪接,随后参与胰岛素刺激的肌动蛋白重排;CLK1 过表达则促进外显子 17 的包含型剪接,并通过磷酸化提高 PKCβII 的表达。
CLK 还能磷酸化剪接体相关因子 SPF45。CLK1 在八个不同的 Ser 残基上磷酸化 SPF45,以磷酸化依赖的方式促进 SKOV-3 细胞的迁移与侵袭;进一步地,CLK1 增强 SPF45 诱导的 Fas mRNA 外显子 6 排除,促进血清刺激下的细胞迁移,而抑制 CLK1 则促使 SPF45 经蛋白酶体途径降解、抑制恶性表型。CLK1 还会磷酸化 U1–70K 的 C 端 Ser226,促进 U1–70K 从核内颗粒释放,随后与 U1 snRNP 及 SRSF1 相互作用,完成剪接体的早期蛋白装配;SRPK1 则把 CLK1 从 U1–70K 上解离下来,使激酶催化得以循环。
肿瘤相关的剪接异常在 CLK2 上体现得尤其具体:在 luminal 与 HER2+ 乳腺癌细胞系,以及 EGFR 扩增的 MDA-MB-468 和依赖 EGF 的 MCF10DCIS 三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)细胞系中,都观察到 CLK2 mRNA 水平升高。CLK2 在 luminal 乳腺癌细胞中通过调节 RBFOX2(而非 SRSF1),促进间充质型 ENAH 外显子 11a 的跳跃;ENAH 外显子 11a 的使用,随后影响乳腺癌细胞的生长、迁移与侵袭。
这一节读下来的感受是:CLK 不是一个“开关”,而是一个调音台。同一个 CLK1,通过不同底物(SRSF1、SRSF2、SRSF4/6、SPF45、U1–70K)在不同细胞里拨动不同的旋钮,最后表现出的表型完全不同。这就是为什么“抑制 CLK1 会怎样”这个问题,在体外可以回答,在体内很难回答。而这正是本页最后一节要展开的事。
CLK 与疾病:神经退行、肌营养不良、炎症、病毒
CLK 通过剪接依赖与非剪接依赖两条路径,参与多种人类非肿瘤疾病与肿瘤的发生发展。原文用两张表把“疾病—化合物—靶点—表型—机制—细胞模型—动物模型”列在了一起,这种表是综述里信息密度最高的部分,也是你写开题报告时最该抄的格式(抄格式,不是抄结论)。下面按病种择要。
神经退行性疾病:tau 外显子 10 与一条自闭症相关通路
tau 蛋白的过度磷酸化与沉积是散发性阿尔茨海默病(AD)的标志,而 tau 外显子 10 可变剪接的失调促进了神经纤维退变。已有报道指出,由 CLK1 或 CLK2 调控的异常剪接事件影响成人神经系统,参与散发性 AD 的发生。CLK1 介导的 SR 蛋白丝氨酸磷酸化,是已被牵涉进 AD 发病机制的关键环节;此外,由 SR 蛋白磷酸化诱导的 tau 外显子 10 可变剪接过程,以及 mCLK2 引起的 pre-mRNA 剪接改变,趋向于成为包括散发性 AD 在内的 tau 病的治疗概念。可惜的是,该研究的作者并未指出 mCLK2 在 AD 中究竟调节了哪些 SR 蛋白——这行字在原文里很不起眼,但它是一个明确的“缺口标记”,提示这条通路还没有闭合。此外,在 AD 中还观察到 CLK2 表达与活性的异常,导致 tau 外显子 10 的可变剪接失调。有一个具体实验值得记:在 HEK293 细胞中转染 2 µg CLK2 质粒,显著增加了 tau 外显子 10 的跳跃。
另一个病种是 Phelan-McDermid 综合征(PMDS)。抑制 CLK2 被提出可作为改善自闭症与神经元功能的潜在治疗策略。在 Shank3 缺陷的神经元中,CLK2 表达的泛素化调控丢失,是该病的遗传学标志之一;而 TG003 处理对 Shank3 缺陷神经元的树突棘密度,产生了与 CLK2 敲低类似的恢复效果。在这个基础上,Indazole 1 与 Indazole 2 在相对低的剂量(300 nM 与 1 µM)下就能提高小鼠脑片中的树突棘密度,而 TG003 需要 10 µM。三百纳摩尔到十微摩尔,差了三十倍——这就是“化合物优化”在文献里的真实样子:不是发明新机制,而是把同一个机制做到更低的浓度。
杜氏肌营养不良:一个点突变把“增强子”变成“沉默子”
杜氏肌营养不良(DMD)是一种致死性的进行性肌肉消耗疾病,由外显子缺失或突变造成的开放阅读框破坏、或 dystrophin mRNA 改变所引起。CLK1 调控的剪接操纵——尤其是外显子跳跃功能——被报道参与 DMD。有一个病例很能说明问题:患者 dystrophin 基因外显子 31 上带 c.4303 G>T 点突变,这个突变把原本 SRp30c/SRSF9 依赖的外显子跳跃增强子(ESE)变成了 hnRNP A1 依赖的外显子跳跃沉默子(ESS),于是外显子 31 被跳跃掉,翻译出一条截短但仍有功能的 dystrophin 蛋白。
在这个背景下,CLK-1、-2、-4 的抑制剂 TG003,在携带 c.4303 G>T 点突变的患者肌肉细胞中促进了 dystrophin 基因外显子 31 的跳跃(对野生型外显子 31 细胞无效),并产生了部分功能的 dystrophin 蛋白。反过来讲,被 CLK 磷酸化的其他 SR 蛋白,在被 TG003 去磷酸化之后,会与 hnRNP A1 协作,在剪接中识别外显子 31。毒性数据也给了:高至 50 µM 的 TG003 在突变 HeLa 细胞中促进外显子 31 跳跃,且对细胞无毒性;小鼠经口给药高至 100 mg/kg/天,未见毒性。此后,TG693 作为能治疗 DMD 的选择性 CLK1 抑制剂被发现,它比 TG003 代谢更稳定;功能上,TG693 通过靶向 CLK1(尤其是 SRSF4 与 SRSF6)介导 SR 蛋白磷酸化,并在携带该点突变的细胞中促进突变外显子 31 的跳跃。
这一段是整篇综述里最“漂亮”的实验逻辑,值得你抄在本子上:一个点突变改变了剪接调控元件的性质(增强子→沉默子),于是抑制上游激酶反而能救回阅读框。注意它的前提——只有在那个突变背景下才有效,野生型细胞里抑制 CLK1 不会让外显子 31 跳掉。这提醒你:任何“剪接矫正”疗法,本质上都是“针对特定突变位点的订正”,不是广谱的抗剪接药。
炎症与骨关节炎:CLK2 是 Wnt 通路的上游音量旋钮
敲低 CLK2 可通过抑制腱细胞分解代谢酶的表达,促进腱细胞分化,提示靶向 CLK2 可能对肌腱病有保护作用。SM04755 被鉴定为 CLK2 与 DYRK1A 的强效抑制剂,两者的 IC50 分别为 5.0 nM 与 3.5 nM;SM04755 通过抑制 CLK2 与 DYRK1A,调节 Wnt 通路基因的内含子保留,进而抑制 Wnt 信号、并抑制炎症信号介质 NF-κB 与 STAT3,从而防止肌腱破坏、促进肌腱再生。
骨关节炎(OA)是一种以骨赘形成、软骨降解和滑膜炎症为特征的疾病。CLK2 与 DYRK1A 通过 Wnt 通路参与 OA,但并不调节 β-catenin 的活性,结果是促炎细胞因子的产生与软骨分解代谢酶的表达。此外,抑制 CLK2 可抑制软骨分解代谢酶的表达,并诱导人间充质干细胞(hMSC)的早期软骨细胞分化。Lorecivivint(SM04690)强效抑制 CLK2(IC50 = 7.8 nM)与 DYRK1A(IC50 = 26.9 nM),从而抑制 CLK2 介导的 SR 蛋白磷酸化,以及 DYRK1A 介导的 SIRT1 与 FOXO1 磷酸化;此外,Lorecivivint 通过显著降低 NF-κB 与 STAT3 活性发挥抗炎作用,凭借对 CLK2 与 DYRK1A 的双重靶向,同时提供症状缓解与炎症修饰。
临床数据在这个靶点上算是“最好看”的:一项 I 期临床试验(NCT02095548)与一项 IIa 期概念验证试验(NCT02536833)在膝 OA 患者中显示,Lorecivivint 看起来安全且耐受良好,强调了它在 OA 中的治疗潜力。一项 IIb 期试验(NCT03122860)的事后分析显示,对膝 OA 受试者关节腔内注射 0.07 mg Lorecivivint,与安慰剂相比,在功能与疼痛上表现出持久的改善。此外,其他临床试验(NCT04385303(III 期)、NCT03928184(III 期)、NCT03727022(II 期))也已开展并完成,用以揭示 Lorecivivint 在膝 OA 中的治疗潜力。
为什么骨关节炎能跑在前面?原文没直说,但数据摆在那里:关节腔注射。局部给药绕过了口服药最难的两关——肠道吸收与系统暴露,用 0.07 mg 这样的剂量就能在关节内达到足够浓度。这不是“CLK 靶点更容易成药”,而是“OA 这个给药途径更容易成药”。你把这句话记住,后面讨论“为什么 CLK 抑制剂在肿瘤里推不动”时,会用到同一把尺子。
病毒复制:把宿主的剪接酶当成抗病毒靶点
HIV-1 的复制是病毒生命周期中的关键过程,而 SR 蛋白被发现参与病毒复制。于是研究者去查位于 SR 蛋白上游的 CLK 在 HIV-1 复制中的作用:CLK1 促进 HIV-1 Gag(一种病毒结构蛋白)的表达,而 CLK2 显著降低 Gag 表达;CLK3 与 CLK4 只表现出温和的促进 Gag 表达的作用。应用氯己定(chlorhexidine,CLK2、-3、-4 的抑制剂,对 CLK2 活性极弱)显著抑制了 HIV-1 Gag 的合成与病毒复制;此外,氯己定处理还抑制了 HIV-1 调节蛋白 Rev 的积累,从而阻断病毒 RNA 的出核。更有意思的是,2001 年就开展过一项 II 期临床试验(NCT00006075),评估葡萄糖酸氯己定在预防 HIV-1 母婴传播(MTCT)中的最佳浓度——在分娩时清洗母亲阴道与新生儿;该试验指出,1% 溶液在降低 HIV-1 母婴传播率方面表现出良好的安全性、耐受性与有效性。这些发现强调了靶向宿主 CLK 来阻断 HIV-1 复制的可能性。
流感 A 的生命周期同样依赖 mRNA 剪接及剪接相关因子,包括 CLK1。敲低 CLK1 通过增加第 7 节段 RNA 的剪接、减少病毒 M1 与 M2 蛋白(对流感病毒复制必需),降低了 A/WSN/33 的复制;进一步地,SRSF3 被鉴定为 CLK1 被抑制后调控病毒 RNA 剪接的关键因子。CLK1 抑制剂 NIH39 与 KH-CB19 显示出抗病毒活性,IC50 分别为 6.6 µM 与 13.6 µM;NIH39 在 12.5 µM 下减少病毒 mRNA 剪接与相关蛋白表达,而 KH-CB19 即使在 50 与 100 µM 的相对高剂量下也没有任何效果——这说明 NIH39 可能是更有前途的抗流感治疗候选。基于 CLK1 在流感复制中的关键作用,一项通过虚拟对接进行的 CLK1 抑制剂筛选,把 J10688(clypearin)、J12098(corilagin)与 J14848(pinosylvin)列为最有潜力的抗流感候选,EC50 分别为 1.2 ± 0.28、2.0 ± 2.22 与 5.28 ± 2.45 µg/mL,细胞毒性浓度(CC50)分别 >200、153.54 与 18.26 µg/mL。从豆科植物 Pithecellobium clypearia 中分离的 J10688,通过破坏病毒蛋白 NP 与 M2 的合成、下调剪接因子 SF2/ASF 与 SC35 的磷酸化,表现出强效抗流感能力。除 HIV-1 与流感 A 之外,CLK1 还在西尼罗病毒与基孔肯雅病毒的复制中起重要作用,使它成为宿主导向抗病毒治疗的有吸引力的细胞靶点。
“靶向宿主蛋白”听起来很聪明——病毒不容易通过突变逃逸,因为靶点不在病毒基因组里。但它有一个天然的代价:宿主蛋白对宿主自己也是必需的。氯己定能抗 HIV,但它同时是消毒剂;这类分子的治疗窗,注定要靠局部给药或极短疗程来撑。
自噬与其他:CLK 的手伸得比想象中长
自噬是细胞通过选择性降解胞内危险物质来保护自身、维持稳态的重要过程,自噬活性的改变与糖尿病、心血管疾病、感染性疾病及药物性器官损伤等广泛的人类疾病相关。CLK1 被报道参与自噬过程的调控:用 10 µM 的 Leucettine L41(同时抑制 DYRK 与 CLK)处理人骨肉瘤 U-2 OS 细胞,可增加 LC3 灶的形成,并以剂量依赖方式诱导自噬;同时,用 RNA 干扰敲低 CLK1 也会导致 U-2 OS 细胞自噬增强。而 Leucettine L33(对 CLK1 与 DYRK 均无活性)与 L38(对 DYRK 更强效)都不能在 U-2 OS 细胞中触发自噬——这组对照很干净,说明触发自噬的主要是 CLK 抑制,而不是 DYRK 抑制。机制上,L41 处理显著提高了含外显子 4 的 CLK1 mRNA 转录本,通过调节 CLK1 自身的剪接,增加了全长激酶异构体。此外,用抑制剂或 siRNA 靶向 CLK1,被推测是通过调节自噬调控因子 pre-mRNA(包括 mTOR 与 X-box 结合蛋白 1,XBP1)的可变剪接来触发自噬。另一个化合物 9e(3,6-二取代咪唑并[1,2-α]吡啶衍生物)强效抑制 CLK1(IC50 = 4 nM),对 CLK2(50 nM)与 CLK4(17 nM)较弱;9e 处理诱导自噬、显著增加自噬流,并影响 SKOV-3 细胞中 CLK1 下游 SR 蛋白的亚细胞重分布与磷酸化水平。
“其他疾病”这一节里有三个短小的机制,值得各记一句。其一,病理性心肌肥厚:CLK4 在维持心脏功能中起关键作用,CLK4 缺失导致病理性心肌肥厚与心力衰竭;CLK4 对 NEXN 的 Ser437 磷酸化可挽救病理性心肌肥厚——这是 CLK 的非剪接依赖功能,也是“CLK4 抑制剂治心脏病”这种想法必须被排除的证据。其二,肝糖异生:CLK2 被鉴定为肝糖异生的抑制因子,其活性受胰岛素/AKT 调控;胰岛素处理导致 H2.35 肝细胞中 CLK2 在 Ser342/Thr343 位点磷酸化,AKT 与 CLK2 的激酶结构域直接结合并在 Thr343 位点磷酸化 CLK2;被激活的 CLK2 磷酸化 PGC-1α 的 SR 域,抑制 PGC-1α 对糖异生基因的转录活性,从而抑制肝糖异生。其三,体温感知:CLK1/4 在 38 °C 完全失活、在 35 °C 重新激活,提示它们可能是响应昼夜体温波动的“分子温度计”;TG003 处理可显著消除温度从 42 °C 降到 35 °C 过程中 SR 蛋白(如 SRSF5 与 SRSF6)的再磷酸化,而温度依赖的剪接事件(包括外显子包含与内含子保留)也在 TG003 处理后发生改变。
CLK 与肿瘤
CLK 表达或活性的改变与肿瘤的发生发展相关;敲低或化学抑制 CLK 会改变可变剪接事件,导致细胞增殖下降。原文依据 TCGA 数据库中的表达状态与临床意义,系统讨论了 CLK 在肿瘤中的作用以及相关抑制剂的治疗效果。下面按成员讲,但请带着一个问题读:同一家族的四个成员,在肿瘤里是同一方向吗?答案是否定的,而这个否定答案比任何一条“高表达=靶点”的结论都更值钱。
CLK1:从胰腺癌的 m6A 到胃癌的十倍差异
CLK1 在胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)组织中 mRNA 与蛋白水平均显著升高,在体外与体内促进细胞生长与转移,CLK1 高表达与 PDAC 预后不良相关。机制上,CLK1 直接磷酸化 SRSF5 的 Ser250;由此抑制 METTL14 外显子 10 的跳跃(生成 METTL14-L 异构体),增强 N6-甲基腺苷(m6A)甲基化与肿瘤转移。此外,Cyclin L2 外显子 6.3 的跳跃(生成 CCNL2-S 异构体)被发现在响应 SRSF5 Ser250 磷酸化时促进 PDAC 细胞增殖。这条链路很长——激酶→SR 蛋白→剪接异构体→RNA 修饰酶→m6A→转移——但它演示了剪接调控如何与表观转录组学接轨:一个剪接事件可以把一个 m6A 写入酶的量改掉,进而改变全基因组的甲基化图谱。
在前列腺癌细胞 PC3 与 DU145 中,抑制 CLK1 降低细胞增殖并诱导凋亡,相关的可变剪接事件经转录组分析得到验证。测序显示以下肿瘤相关基因的可变剪接发生显著改变:着丝粒蛋白 E(CENPE,外显子 38 包含)、姐妹染色单体黏连建立 N-乙酰转移酶 2(ESCO2,外显子 9 跳跃)、细胞骨架相关蛋白 2(CKAP2,外显子 3 跳跃)、母源胚胎亮氨酸拉链激酶(MELK,外显子 13 跳跃)、天冬氨酸 β-羟化酶(ASPH,外显子 6 与 8 跳跃)以及 CD164(外显子 5 跳跃)。在缺氧条件下(1%、0.2% 与 0% 氧),PC3 细胞中 CLK1 与 CLK3 的表达被持续诱导,同时观察到 CASP9 剪接的改变。
在胃癌中,CLK1 在肿瘤样本中的表达比正常胃组织高 10%–30%;一项磷酸化蛋白组学研究显示,CLK1 及其相关剪接机器通路是胃癌中最重要的调控因子;CLK1 在胃癌组织中过表达,抑制 CLK1 可抑制细胞增殖、迁移与侵袭。在卵巢癌中,SPF45 被鉴定为 CLK1 的细胞靶点:LC-电喷雾串联质谱显示 CLK1 能磷酸化 SPF45 的八个丝氨酸残基(Ser48、62、202、204、222、266、288 与 291);CLK1 过表达提高 SPF45 蛋白水平,并在 SKOV-3 细胞中促进 SPF45 诱导的 Fas mRNA 外显子 6 排除;抑制 CLK1 则通过蛋白酶体依赖方式缩短 SPF45 的半衰期。一个有意思的细节:激酶失活的 Ser48/222/266 突变体显著增加外显子 6 排除,而 Ser202/204 突变为丙氨酸则显著减少外显子 6 排除——这说明 CLK1 是按位点差异调节 SPF45 剪接活性的,而不是“磷酸化越多样越好”。
基于 TCGA 数据,CLK1 在多种肿瘤中显著过表达,包括胆管癌(CHOL)、结肠腺癌(COAD)、头颈鳞癌(HNSC)、肾透明细胞癌(KIRC)、肾乳头状细胞癌(KIRP)、肝细胞癌(LIHC)、前列腺腺癌(PRAD)、直肠腺癌(READ)与胃腺癌(STAD)。但原文加了一句很诚实的话:CLK1 可能通过不同机制参与肿瘤的发生、进展与演化,其功能很可能是肿瘤特异性的。这句“cancer specific”是综述里少见的自我限制,读者应当把它当成一个警告,而不是套话。
CLK2:乳腺癌、胶质瘤与一条被 14-3-3τ 稳住的通路
CLK2 表达升高与非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)预后不良相关;在晚期(III–IV 期)与转移患者中 CLK2 表达升高,提示 CLK2 可能是 NSCLC 的潜在生物标志物;miR-573 抑制 CLK2 表达,阻断由 CLK2 过表达引起的肺癌发生发展。在 luminal 乳腺癌中,CLK2 的过表达与扩增促进细胞增殖、迁移、侵袭与移植瘤生长;CLK2 高表达的乳腺癌表现出更强的增殖表型,依据是 cyclin B1、CDK1、磷酸化 Rb 水平升高以及 Hippo 信号通路的激活状态。此外,CLK2 促进间充质型 ENAH 变体(即外显子 11a 跳跃)以促进乳腺肿瘤的侵袭与转移;对 CLK2 的药理抑制在 Myc 驱动的自发乳腺癌同种移植模型中导致显著的生长抑制、凋亡与外显子跳跃。RNA-seq 分析还显示,细胞周期、DNA 修复、RNA 剪接与 RNA 转运通路中的基因在可变剪接层面受到调控。
在胶质母细胞瘤中,CLK2 水平升高的细胞系在 CLK2 缺失后细胞周期阻滞于 G1 与 S 期;机制上,敲低 CLK2 通过下调 AKT/FOXO3a/p27 信号在体外中断细胞周期,从而减少体内胶质母细胞瘤生长并延长生存;此外,胶质母细胞瘤患者标本中的 CLK2 表达与患者生存时间呈负相关。在胶质瘤干样细胞(GSC)中,14-3-3τ 直接与 CLK2 结合,通过调节蛋白酶体降解提高 CLK2 的稳定性;同时,CLK2 在 GSC272 脑肿瘤细胞系中负向调节 PP2A 活性——CLK2 下调导致与 14-3-3τ 的结合亲和力下降、与磷酸化 PP2A 的结合亲和力上升,结果激活 PI3K 信号通路。因此,把 CLK2 敲低与 PI3K/mTOR 抑制剂 GSK2126458 联用,显著减少了 GSC272 移植小鼠的肿瘤生长;在 CLK2 敲低的 GSC 小鼠模型中给予 FGFR 抑制剂 LY2874455,也观察到凋亡诱导。TCGA 数据显示 CLK2 在多种肿瘤中过表达,其高表达与宫颈鳞癌/宫颈内膜腺癌(CESC)、COAD 与 KIRC 的不良临床结局相关。
CLK3:一个功能获得性突变,和一条 c-Myc 正反馈环
CLK3 在胆管癌(CCA)患者中上调,并参与核苷酸代谢。研究在 CLK3 激酶结构域中发现了一个功能获得性体细胞突变 Q607R,它诱导 USP13 的 Y708 磷酸化,促进 USP13 与 c-Myc 结合;该结合阻止 c-Myc 泛素化、增强 c-Myc 活性,从而提高 CCA 中 c-Myc 介导的嘌呤合成。反过来,被激活的 c-Myc 又通过增强 CLK3 启动子活性来提高 CLK3 转录,形成一个 CLK3–USP13–c-Myc 正反馈环;而其他 CLK 家族成员不受 c-Myc 影响。这条环的意义在于:CLK3 在这里不是“剪接激酶”,而是“代谢激酶”,它的底物是 USP13,不是 SR 蛋白。
CLK3 在肝细胞癌(HCC)中也显著上调,与 HCC 的 TNM 分期及患者预后密切相关;功能分析显示 CLK3 促进 Wnt 3a 转录并激活 Wnt/β-catenin 级联,导致 HCC 细胞在体外增殖、迁移与侵袭增强,动物实验也显示 CLK3 增加体内肿瘤发展;此外,miR-144/CLK3 轴被发现削弱 Wnt/β-catenin 信号,从而抑制 HCC 的发展与转移。CLK3 还通过调节 HMGA2 的可变剪接影响造血干细胞(见前文)。TCGA 汇总显示 CLK3 在 CHOL、HNSC、肾嫌色细胞癌(KICH)、KIRC、KIRP、LIHC、PRAD 与 STAD 中表达升高,且在 COAD 中与较差的总生存(OS)相关。
CLK4:一个方向相反的例子,和一次被氧化的甲硫氨酸
CLK4 在间充质样三阴性乳腺癌(MES-TNBC)细胞中过表达,并与患者生存不良相关;在移植瘤小鼠模型中沉默 CLK4 会降低多个上皮-间充质转化(EMT)基因的表达,这些基因参与转移并抑制 TNBC 细胞迁移;值得注意的是,敲低 CLK4 削弱了 SMAD3(TGF-β 信号转导的介质)的表达,提示 CLK4 过表达可促进 MES-TNBC 细胞的转移与侵袭表型;药理抑制 CLK4 也抑制了 MES-TNBC 细胞的生长与侵袭性。
但 CLK4 在食管鳞癌(ESCC)中却是另一副面孔:由于其启动子甲基化,CLK4 在 ESCC 细胞与患者样本中广泛下调。机制上,CLK4 磷酸化小眼畸形相关转录因子(MITF)的 Tyr360,促进 MITF 的自噬降解;作为反馈轴,MITF 结合 CLK4 启动子中的 E-box,在转录水平下调 CLK4 表达。此外,CLK4 被证明是一种氧化还原敏感的激酶:Met307 氧化导致 CLK4 激酶活性受损,反而增强 ESCC 的癌变。这一发现揭示了 CLK4 在调节嘌呤合成与氧化还原状态中的新功能,与其在可变剪接中的作用并存。TCGA 数据里 CLK4 的表达方向也不统一:在 CHOL、胶质母细胞瘤(GBM)、HNSC、KIRC、KIRP、LIHC、PRAD 与 STAD 中升高,而在 BLCA、BRCA、LUSC、嗜铬细胞瘤与副神经节瘤(PCGC)、THCA 与 UCEC 中降低。
把 CLK1–4 放在一起看,会出现一个对“靶点”这个词很不友好的图景:CLK1 在多数实体瘤中促癌,CLK2 在乳腺癌与胶质瘤中促癌,CLK3 在胆管癌与肝癌中促癌,而 CLK4 在 TNBC 中促癌、在 ESCC 中却像抑癌因子。再加上 CLK3 的 Q607R 与 CLK4 的 Met307 氧化,你会发现:“CLK 抑制剂抗癌”这句话,只有在说清楚亚型、肿瘤类型与遗传背景之后才成立。综述在这里没有替读者下结论,它只是把矛盾摆出来——这恰恰是它比很多“某某通路是肿瘤治疗新靶点”的文章更可信的地方。
CLK 抑制剂与临床进展
基于前文的证据,靶向 CLK 作为治疗多种肿瘤的潜在手段,越来越受到临床研究者的关注。目前已有一批化合物得到深入研究,它们通常结合在 CLK 的 ATP 口袋内,绝大多数是 ATP 竞争性抑制剂(ATP-competitive)——也就是说,它们与细胞内毫摩尔级的 ATP 抢同一个位点,这决定了它们的效力必须做到纳摩尔级才有机会在细胞里起作用。判断一个化合物在细胞里是否真的打到了 CLK,常用的表型指标是 SR 蛋白的磷酸化水平,以及 SR 蛋白从核质重新分布到核斑(nuclear speckles)——后者是“激酶被抑制”的经典细胞学证据。
先说那个绕不开的工具化合物。TG003 是一种苯并噻唑类化合物,在体外磷酸化实验中显示出对 CLK1 与 CLK4 的强效抑制:对鼠源 CLK 的 IC50 分别为 mCLK1 20 nM、mCLK2 200 nM、mCLK4 15 nM;对 mCLK3、SRPK1、SRPK2 与 PKC 的抑制活性则较弱。此外,TG003 以 ATP 竞争方式作用于 CLK1/Sty 激酶(Km 为 3.35 µM),Ki 值为 10 nM;10 µM TG003 可抑制 HeLa 细胞中的 Clk/Sty 激酶活性与 SR 蛋白磷酸化,并抑制 CLK 依赖的可变剪接。TG003 还通过减少内含子 4 保留与外显子 4 跳跃,调节 CLK1 mRNA 自身的可变剪接,从而改变全长催化活性型(CLK1T1)与截短失活型(CLK1T2)异构体的产生比例——一个抑制剂能改变自己靶点的剪接,这件事本身就是“剪接调控网络是闭环”的证据。
KH-CB19 是另一种强效、高选择性的 CLK 抑制剂,在温度迁移实验中被证明能与 CLK1 和 CLK4 强结合;酶学实验显示其对 CLK1 的 IC50 相对较低,而对 CLK3 为 530 nM、对 DYRK1A 为 55.2 nM;共晶结构显示它结合在 CLK1 与 CLK3 的 ATP 结合位点。10 µM KH-CB19 抑制 SRp75、SRp55 与 SRp20 的磷酸化,而 TG003 只抑制 SRp20 的磷酸化——同一类靶点、不同的底物覆盖,这是选择性的另一个维度。10 µM KH-CB19 还能抑制 HMEC-1 细胞中全长组织因子(flTF)与可变剪接型人组织因子(asHTF)的表达。它的 E 型异构体 KH-CB20 具有相同的结构与相近的激酶结合亲和力(CLK1 16.5 nM、CLK3 488 nM、DYRK1A 57.8 nM)。
真正进过临床的,是下面这三个名字(摘要里点名的那三个)。SM08502(Cirtuvivint)是第一个进入临床试验的 CLK 小分子抑制剂,为强效的泛 CLK 抑制剂,对 CLK1、CLK2、CLK3、CLK4 的 IC50 分别为 8 nM、2 nM、22 nM 与 1 nM。尽管亲和力很高,它同时也抑制了结构相似的其他激酶,说明存在脱靶效应与潜在的细胞毒性。SM08502 显著抑制胃肠道肿瘤中 CLK 的激酶活性、降低 SRSF 磷酸化,并破坏剪接体活性,从而减少 Wnt 信号通路基因剪接变体的产生;口服给药显著抑制胃肠道肿瘤生长,在移植瘤模型中也降低了 SRSF 磷酸化与 Wnt 通路基因表达。一项 I 期临床试验(NCT03355066)正在评估 SM08502 治疗无标准疗法的晚期实体瘤的疗效,评价其口服给药的安全性、耐受性、药代动力学(PK)、药效动力学(PD)与初步抗肿瘤活性;2021 年又登记了针对去势抵抗性前列腺癌、NSCLC 与结直肠癌的试验(NCT05084859)。
Silmitasertib(CX-4945)是 CLK2 与 CK2 的双重抑制剂:它对 CK2α 与 CK2α′ 的 IC50 为 1 nM,对 CLK1 为 82.3 nM、CLK2 为 3.8 nM、CLK3 为 90 nM,对 SRPK1 与 SRPK2 则 >1000 nM。CX-4945 是 CLK2 的 ATP 竞争性抑制剂,能在 3–90 nM 的 IC50 范围内调节 SR 蛋白磷酸化;用 CX-4945 处理 293-T 细胞后,SRSF4、SRSF6、SRSF5 与 SRSF1 的磷酸化状态显著下降。有意思的是,它的效力比 TG003 更强:1 µM CX-4945 与 10 µM TG003 对 SR 蛋白磷酸化的效果相当。CX-4945 在多种人类恶性肿瘤中显示出疗效:在 CCA 细胞中抑制增殖并诱导不依赖 caspase-3 的非自噬性细胞死亡;抑制 TGF-β1 诱导的 A549 细胞迁移与侵袭,并在体外引起细胞周期阻滞;在体内以剂量依赖方式抑制 BT-474 与 BxPC-3 移植瘤生长。此外,CX-4945 与硼替佐米联用治疗急性淋巴细胞白血病、多发性骨髓瘤与套细胞淋巴瘤细胞系时观察到协同效应;与达沙替尼联用在卵巢癌中、与顺铂和吉西他滨联用在胆管癌中、与替莫唑胺联用在 GBM 中,均观察到疗效提高。临床方面:一项 I/II 期试验(NCT03904862)评估 CX-4945 在复发髓母细胞瘤患者中的安全性与耐受性,正在招募;另一项 I 期试验(NCT03897036)评估 CX-4945 在基底细胞癌(BCC)中的治疗持续时间与药效动力学,也在招募;一项 CX-4945 与 ATM 抑制剂(舒尼替尼、帕唑帕尼与替西罗莫司)联用治疗肾癌的研究(NCT03571438)正在进行。最近完成的一项 I/II 期试验(NCT02128282)评估 CX-4945 递增剂量联合吉西他滨+顺铂一线治疗胆管癌的安全性、耐受性,以确定最大耐受剂量(MTD)与 II 期推荐剂量(RP2D):采用 200 mg CX-4945 联合 25 mg/m² 顺铂或 1000 mg/m² 吉西他滨来估算 MTD 与 RP2D。遗憾的是,结果目前尚未公开。
Lorecivivint(SM04690)则是那个“跑得最前面”的分子:强效抑制 CLK2(IC50 = 7.8 nM)与 DYRK1A(26.9 nM),在膝 OA 中已完成 I 期、IIa、IIb 期并开展 III 期(详见上一节)。请注意它和 Cirtuvivint 的差别不在化学,而在给药途径:一个是关节腔注射 0.07 mg,一个是口服全身暴露。用同一把“成药性”尺子去量,两者根本不在一个难度等级上。
表 1 本综述提到的主要 CLK 抑制剂(按靶点与效力择要,数据照录原文)
| 化合物 | 主要靶点与效力 | 研究阶段/用途 | 一句话 |
|---|---|---|---|
| TG003 | mCLK1 20 nM、mCLK2 200 nM、mCLK4 15 nM;ATP 竞争性,Ki 10 nM | 工具化合物 | 2004 年起的“标准尺”,全世界的对照药 |
| KH-CB19 | CLK1/CLK4 强结合;CLK3 530 nM、DYRK1A 55.2 nM | 工具化合物 | 共晶结构揭示了铰链区结合模式 |
| T-025 | Kd:CLK1 4.8、CLK2 0.096、CLK3 6.5、CLK4 0.61 nM | 临床前 | 对 CLK2 做到皮摩尔级,但 DYRK 也一起被抑制 |
| CLK1-IN-1 | CLK1 2 nM、CLK2 31 nM、CLK4 8 nM、DYRK1A 138 nM | 临床前 | 诱导自噬;30 mg/kg 有保肝作用 |
| DB18 | CLK1 11、CLK2 27、CLK3 1280、CLK4 20 nM | 临床前 | CLK1/2/4 选择性好,但对 CLK3 几乎无效 |
| SM08502(Cirtuvivint) | CLK1 8、CLK2 2、CLK3 22、CLK4 1 nM | I 期(NCT03355066 等) | 第一个进临床的 CLK 抑制剂,泛 CLK,脱靶明显 |
| CX-4945(Silmitasertib) | CK2α 1 nM;CLK2 3.8 nM;CLK1 82.3、CLK3 90 nM;SRPK >1000 nM | I/II 期(髓母细胞瘤、BCC、胆管癌等) | 名义上是 CK2 抑制剂,实际是 CLK2/CK2 双靶点 |
| Lorecivivint(SM04690) | CLK2 7.8 nM、DYRK1A 26.9 nM | III 期(膝骨关节炎,关节腔注射) | 唯一走到后期的 CLK 相关药物,靠局部给药绕开全身毒性 |
| Leucettine L41 | DYRK1A 60、DYRK1B 44、DYRK2 73 nM;对 CLK 较弱(CLK3 由 1.8 nM 升至 >10 µM) | 工具化合物 | “双家族”抑制剂,用它做实验必须交代清了谁在起作用 |
这张表你最好自己重画一遍,并且加上第六列:细胞活性。原文给了几个数字,能让你立刻看到“生化效力”与“细胞效力”之间的鸿沟:DB18 对 CLK1 的 IC50 是 11 nM,在 MCF-7 与 PC3 细胞上的细胞毒 IC50 却是 4 µM 与 7 µM;MU1210 对 CLK1/2/4 的 IC50 分别为 8、20、12 nM,在 MCF-7 上的细胞活力 IC50 为 4.6 µM;cpd-2 与 cpd-3 对 CLK1/2 的 IC50 都是 1.1 nM,而在多种癌细胞上的 GI50 落在 0.6–3.4 µM(例如 cpd-2 在 MDA-MB-468 为 3.0 µM、在 COLO320DM 为 0.6 µM)。三百到一千倍的落差,通常来自细胞膜通透性、外排泵、胞内 ATP 竞争(细胞内 ATP 约 1–5 mM)以及靶点占用率。而 IC50、Kd、GI50 这几个数,在中文语境里经常被混着用(见注 12),这会让读者把“结合”误读成“有效”。
除此之外,原文还列了一批“有活性、但机制与体内证据尚不充分”的化合物:化合物 9e(CLK1 4 nM / CLK2 50 nM / CLK4 17 nM)、CC-671(CLK2 与 Mps1/TTK 双靶点,IC50 6 nM 与 5 nM)、Thiophene 48(基于骆驼蓬碱改造的 DYRK/CLK1 双靶点,CLK1 40 nM)、KuWal151(CLK1/2/4 的 IC50 88/510/28 nM,对 CLK3 与 DYRK 无活性)、GPS167(抑制 CLKs 对 SRSF10 的磷酸化,且其抑制细胞生长的作用呈 p53 依赖),以及 3A5、ML315、SRI-29329、ML167、ML106、BM07114 等——这些化合物缺乏支持其抗疾病效力的临床前数据。原文最后一句说得很克制:“不断揭示 CLK 抑制剂预防各种疾病的潜在努力,将为药物开发铺路。”
讨论:为什么 CLK 到现在还没成药
综述的结论与展望部分,把 CLK 描绘成“一类新的疾病标志”,并明确指出仍有局限:CLK 与免疫治疗、肿瘤微环境的关系目前未知;需要包括 CLK 条件性敲除或原位疾病模型在内的动物模型,才能充分理解 CLK 在疾病发生发展中的重要性;鉴于最近发现 CLK4 的 Met307 氧化会破坏其激酶活性,应当开展更多研究来探索能调节 CLK 功能与表达的翻译后修饰;CLK3 激酶结构域内的 Q607R 突变增强 c-Myc 活性、促进 CCA,说明 CLK 体细胞突变在人类疾病中很重要,因此一张详述各 CLK 突变功能后果的突变图谱,将有助于探索 CLK 的分子机制。
而在抑制剂这一侧,原文把挑战归纳为四条“努力方向”,我在下面按自己的理解重排成五关,每一关都配一个原文里的数字,你可以把它当成一套检查清单:
第一关:亚型选择性。原文的第一条目标就是“靶向抑制特定 CLK 以实现精准治疗”——目前大多数小分子 CLK 药物是广谱抑制剂,需要能分别靶向 CLK1、CLK2、CLK3 或 CLK4 的特异性抑制剂。但注意,原文给出的第二条目标恰好相反:“开发泛 CLK 抑制剂以增强抗癌效果”,理由是不同 CLK 成员的功能异常与表达紊乱在多种疾病中同时出现。这两条目标并列写在同一段里,看起来矛盾,其实是同一个事实的两面:当你不确定哪个亚型在驱动疾病时,广谱是保险;当你确定时,广谱就是毒性。而确定本身,需要前面那些“哪个肿瘤、哪个突变、哪个剪接事件”的证据——这正是综述前半部分在铺的路。
第二关:脱靶与家族内串扰。第三条目标是“通过结构优化提高抑制剂相对其他同源 CMGC 家族蛋白的特异性与选择性”,因为许多 CLK 抑制剂对 DYRK 与 SRPK 等同源激酶表现出轻微或强的脱靶效应。数据就在前面:CX-4945 对 CK2α 的 IC50 是 1 nM,对 CLK2 是 3.8 nM,对 SRPK 则 >1000 nM——它到底是 CK2 药还是 CLK 药?T-025 对 CLK2 的 Kd 是 0.096 nM,但原文同时写明“对 DYRK 家族蛋白也观察到低 Kd”;Leucettine L41 对 DYRK1B 的 IC50 是 44 nM,对 CLK3 从 1.8 nM 变成 >10 µM,说明它压根不是 CLK 药。当你读到“某某抑制剂处理细胞后 SR 蛋白磷酸化下降”时,请先问:它抑制的是 CLK,还是 DYRK,还是两者?(见注 14)
第三关:从生化效力到细胞与体内效力。前文那张表里的三百到一千倍落差,是这一关的量化版本。更麻烦的是,很多化合物只有“细胞毒 IC50”,没有靶点占用的直接证据;而 CLK 抑制的药效学标志物(SR 蛋白磷酸化水平)是半定量的免疫印迹,很难标准化。原文对此着墨不多,但它在展望里承认需要更好的模型与更完整的机制——翻译成人话:这个领域还缺一个能进临床的 PD 生物标志物。
第四关:治疗窗。CLK 抑制的是全局剪接调控。SR 蛋白的磷酸化—去磷酸化循环对几乎所有细胞都是必需的(见注 16),这意味着全身、持续地抑制 CLK,本质上接近一种“温和的细胞毒性化疗”:增殖快的组织(骨髓、肠上皮、毛囊)先受影响。Cirtuvivint 的“脱靶与潜在细胞毒性”被原文明确写出;氯己定能抗 HIV,但它是消毒剂;Lorecivivint 能进 III 期,靠的是关节腔局部给药。这三件事指向同一个结论:CLK 的药,成败很大程度上取决于“递送到哪里”,而不只是“抑制得多强”。
第五关:适应症与商业逻辑。原文的第四条目标是联合用药——“CLK 抑制剂与其他化合物联用以取得协同效应”,并举了 CLK-IN-T3 与 Bcl-xL/Bcl-2 抑制剂 ABT-263 联用在 A2780 与 HCT116 细胞中协同诱导 caspase 3/7 依赖的凋亡,以及 SF3b 靶向剪接调节剂 E7107 与 ABT-263 联用在 NSCLC 细胞系中协同增强凋亡的例子。联合用药是理性选择:既然单药治疗窗窄,就压低单药剂量、靠机制互补拿疗效。但它同时也是“单药没做成”的委婉说法。
最后,原文还有一句容易被略过的话,我认为是整篇综述最诚实的地方:CLK 与免疫治疗、肿瘤微环境的关系目前未知。在 2023 年,肿瘤免疫是最大的资金流向,一个靶点如果说不清它与免疫微环境的关系,就很难拿到后续的临床资源。这句话放在展望里,既是学术缺口,也是现实处境。
所以,“为什么 CLK 到现在还没成药”的答案不是“靶点不好”。恰恰相反,CLK 的生物学非常硬:它有明确的底物、明确的表型、明确的疾病关联,甚至有一个已经跑到 III 期的分子。它卡住的地方是药物学的:亚型之间太像(选择性难)、家族之间太像(脱靶难避)、通路太普适(治疗窗窄)、标志物太软(疗效难测)、给药部位太挑(适应症受限)。这和你在页 03 看到的 MshC 故事,其实是同一类困境的两个版本——那边卡在“进不了细菌”,这边卡在“进了人体也分不清好坏”。
这篇在轨迹里的位置
把六篇按时间排开:2021 年 IJMS 的人源 ProRS 抑制剂、2022 年 Commun Biol 的 LeuRS 催化机制、2022 年 IJMS 的 MshC 结构与抑制剂(本专区页 03)、2023 年这篇 STTT 的 CLK 综述、2026 年 JBC 的脓肿分枝杆菌 MshC、2026 年 ACS Omega 的 PZA 衍生物。前两篇是“把一个酶怎么工作看清楚”,第三篇是“把它当靶点设计分子”,这一篇则跳出了“一个酶”的尺度,去看“一个激酶家族在疾病里能扮演多少种角色”。
所以这篇的位置很特别:它不是她实验工作的延伸,而是她第一次以共同第一作者的身份,参与组织一张疾病靶点地图。作者名单里,第一作者是宋梦秋(Mengqiu Song),她排第二并标注同等贡献;资深作者是 Zigang Dong,所在团队在美国北达科他州立大学(NDSU),方向是肿瘤。这个组合解释了综述的落点:疾病部分覆盖神经、肌肉、炎症、病毒,但肿瘤与抑制剂两节写得最厚——这是合作方视角的自然投射,也是她需要补上的一块拼图。
从“酶的结构与机制”跨到“疾病靶点综述”,中间缺的正是这一篇提供的东西:把零散的化合物、模型、临床数据整理成可比较的表格,再从表格的空白处看出问题。你如果只把综述当“背景介绍”来读,就浪费了它最有价值的用法——它是训练“判断成药性”的最好材料,因为它同时给你靶点的强度(机制清楚、遗传学证据硬)和药物的失败(选择性、治疗窗、标志物)。两年后她去研究脓肿分枝杆菌的 MshC、再往后做 PZA 衍生物,某种意义上都是在回答同一类问题:这个靶点值不值得做分子,做出来的分子能不能到该到的地方。
给刚进组的你
第一,综述有三种读法,别只用第一种。当背景读,你会记住“CLK 调控剪接,与肿瘤相关”;当词典读,你会在写引言时回来查某条通路的原始文献;当缺口清单读,你才会看见“CLK 与肿瘤微环境的关系未知”“缺 PD 标志物”“CLK4 在不同肿瘤中方向相反”这些能变成课题的句子。第三种读法最慢,也最值钱。
第二,把表建起来。这篇综述最硬的资产是它那两张表。你自己重画时,列这样设:化合物 / 靶点 / 生化 IC50 / 细胞 IC50 或 GI50 / 动物模型与剂量 / 临床期别 / 给药途径。画完你会自动看到两件事:一是生化与细胞效力普遍差两到三个数量级;二是能进临床的分子,往往有一个“聪明的给药途径”或“一个明确的联合方案”,而不是单纯效力更高。
第三,术语要抠。IC50 是“抑制 50% 活性所需的浓度”,取决于你用的底物浓度与 ATP 浓度;Kd 是“解离常数”,是热力学的量;GI50 是“抑制 50% 细胞生长”的浓度,已经混进了通透性、外排、代谢。三者同名不同义,混用会让你的结论在答辩时被一句话问倒。同理,selective 与 specific、pan 与 broad-spectrum,也不是同义词。
第四,判断一个靶点“热不热”与“成不成”,看三件事:有没有进临床的分子(有,说明化学可行);临床走的是哪条给药途径(局部注射比口服容易一个数量级);有没有能测的药效学标志物(没有,就很难做剂量爬坡)。这三条你在任何一篇“某某是潜在靶点”的文章里都能套用,套完你会对“潜在”两个字有全新的敬意。
第五,如果你现在要进实验室做实验,这一页能直接用的东西是两个。一是“磷酸化—剪接—表型”的三段式验证模板:先证明化合物结合/抑制激酶(生化),再证明细胞内底物磷酸化下降(细胞),再证明某个特定剪接事件改变(RNA),最后才是表型。缺任何一段,审稿人都会问。二是“对照要选对”:L41 vs L33 vs L38 那组对照,用的是“对 CLK 与 DYRK 活性不同”的同系物,而不是简单的“加药 vs 不加药”。这种对照设计,比多做十个样本更能说服人。
▲ 本部分翻译难点(对照学习用)
附录 · 英文原文
Cdc2-like kinases: structure, biological function and therapeutic targets for diseases
Abstract
The CLKs (Cdc2-like kinases) belong to the dual-specificity protein kinase family and play crucial roles in regulating transcript splicing via the phosphorylation of SR proteins (SRSF1–12), catalyzing spliceosome molecular machinery, and modulating the activities or expression of non-splicing proteins. The dysregulation of these processes is linked with various diseases, including neurodegenerative diseases, Duchenne muscular dystrophy, inflammatory diseases, viral replication, and cancer. Thus, CLKs have been considered as potential therapeutic targets, and significant efforts have been exerted to discover potent CLKs inhibitors. In particular, clinical trials aiming to assess the activities of the small molecules Lorecivivint on knee Osteoarthritis patients, and Cirtuvivint and Silmitasertib in different advanced tumors have been investigated for therapeutic usage. In this review, we comprehensively documented the structure and biological functions of CLKs in various human diseases and summarized the significance of related inhibitors in therapeutics. Our discussion highlights the most recent CLKs research, paving the way for the clinical treatment of various human diseases.
Introduction of CLKs
The Cdc2-like kinases (CLKs) belong to the dual-specificity protein kinase (DSK)family, which catalyze the phosphorylation of serine, threonine, and tyrosine of substrates.[1] The CLKs family consists of four homologous proteins (CLK1 - 4) and all family members are evolutionarily conserved in eukaryots.[2],[3] Specifically, CLKs are classified as a CMGC kinase (cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs), mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs), glycogen synthase kinases (GSKs), and CDK-like kinases) group that share the same ATP co-factor and catalyze the phosphorylation of downstream protein substrates.[4]–[6] The CLK kinase domain contains an “EHLAMMERILG” motif and is located at the C-terminus of each family member. Thus, CLK proteins are also known as the “LAMMER” family[7] (Fig.). CLKs are located in the cytoplasm and nucleus, but mainly exert functions in the nuclear compartment by phosphorylating the serine / arginine (Ser-Arg) -rich domain of splicing factors.[8]–[10] Generally, phosphorylation of CLKs downstream substrates is driven by recognition of the universal consensus R-x-x-S/T sequence.[3],[11] On this basis, CLKs control pre-mRNA splicing to generate different protein isoforms, which play crucial roles in cell growth and survival.[11] SR proteins (SRSF1–12) are well-defined substrates of CLKs that bind with pre-mRNA and related spliceosome components to facilitate spliceosome assembly.[12]–[14] Activated SR proteins that have been phosphorylated by CLKs participate in alternative splicing (AS) and catalyze splicing processes.[12] On the contrary, the functional SR proteins are subsequently dephosphorylated by phosphatases. This process is required for the export of spliced mRNA from the nucleus.[12],[15],[16]Fig. 1Structural comparison of human CLKs. a Domain structures of human CLK1, -2, -3, and -4. b Crystal structure of human CLK1 without N-terminus domain (PDB ID: 6I5H). The protein structure backbone is visualized as a cartoon representation, while the ligand and its interacting residues are visualized as sticks. H-bonds are shown as black dashed lines. The coloring of all domains and signature sequence motifs are consistent with panel a. c Structural superposition of CLK1 (PDB ID: 6I5H, green), CLK2 (PDB ID: 6KHE, cyan), CLK3 (PDB ID: 2EU9, magenta) and CLK4 (PDB ID: 6FYV, yellow). The protein structural backbone is represented as a ribbon. d Electrostatic surface representation of CLKs. The blue and red colors represent positive and negative charges, respectively. The different pockets among these kinases were determined by the distances between side chains of conserved Val residue in the N-lobe and DFG-1 residue in the C-lobe
Among the four family members of CLKs, CLK1 has been structurally and functionally well characterized. CLK1, also termed STY, has been identified to be auto-phosphorylated at Ser / Thr / Tyr residues and phosphorylates Ser residues of its substrates.[17],[18] The catalytic domain of CLK1 is located at the C-terminus, whereas the N-terminus contains the Ser-Arg repeats responsible for mediating the interactions with the corresponding substrates.[9] The kinase domain of CLK1 phosphorylates not only Ser-Arg dipeptide, but also Ser-Lys and Ser-Pro sites.[19] Functionally, CLK1 is co-localized with SR proteins in the nucleus and facilitates the conformational change of the SRSF1 protein. This process subsequently disrupts the export of SRSF1 from the nucleus to cytosol and heightens SRSF1 binding to primary transcripts.[20] However, loss of SRSF1 phosphorylation results in decreased alternative splicing of more than 100 genes, leading to irregular gene expression.[20],[21] CLK1 abundance was shown to vary periodically over the cell cycle and reached a peak at the G2/M phase, indicating a close relationship between CLK1 expression and cell cycle progression.[21] Similar to CLK1, CLK2, −3, and −4 were also shown to contribute to cell growth and disease occurrence via the regulation of splicing.[12] In addition, human CLK2 was found to play a role in fatty liver disease through participating in fatty acid oxidation and ketogenesis.[22] CLK3 was suggested to play a pivotal role in the fertilization process due to its overexpression in mature spermatozoa.[23] CLK4 has been implicated to modulate pre-mRNA intron-retaining splicing after stress withdraw.[12],[24] Collectively, CLKs act as critical regulators and exert important functions which are essential in catalyzing splicing and modulating phosphorylation. In this review, we systematically describe the structure of CLK family members, their biological functions, and the potential roles in human diseases progression, such as neurodegenerative diseases, inflammatory diseases, viral replication, and cancer. Finally, we comprehensively summarize the related small molecular inhibitors of CLKs and their therapeutic potential in various human diseases.
Crystal structure of CLKs
Structurally, all four members of the human CLKs share highly conserved topology. Each of the proteins is comprised of a flexible unstructured N-terminal region (around 140–300 residues) and a conserved kinase domain[3],[7] (Fig.). Despite being unstructured, the N-terminal extensions of CLKs were reported to resemble similar RS (arginine / serine) domains present in their target SR protein substrates which then act as a bridge mediating the interactions between their kinase domain and the RS domain of the SR proteins. Removing this N-terminus of CLK1 results in a significant decrease of the phosphorylation level of the RS domain of SRSF1. This observation further reflects that the intrinsic disordered region of CLK1 and its mediated protein-protein contacts not only enhances the binding of the downstream proteins but also facilitates the hyperphosphorylation of the substrates.[25]
In contrast, the catalytic domain of CLKs is well-ordered and displays a typical kinase fold, containing an N-lobe and a C-lobe bridged by a hinge region forming a conserved ATP binding pocket[3],[12] (Fig.). The N-lobe consists of three β-strands, an α-helix, and two additional β-strands. The C-lobe possesses three conserved structural insertions defining the CLK family.[3] These signature motifs are β-hairpin insertion, a LAMMER domain, and a mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK)-like insertion (Fig.). The extended β-hairpin insertion present at the top of the C-lobe (residues 297–319 in CLK1, 299–321 in CLK2, 440–462 in CLK3 and 295–317 in CLK4) is highly conserved in CLK family members. Another predominant sequence motif has invariant “EHLAMMERILG” region (residues 386–396 in CLK1, 388–398 in CLK2, 529–539 in CLK3 and 384–394 in CLK4), from which the family name LAMMER protein kinase is derived, located at the bottom of the C-lobe (Fig.). The last shared MAPK-like insertion is organized as helix-strand-strand-helix while in the same region in MAPK protein family, the two-strand β-sheet is substituted with a loop. These structural features of CLK-specific sequence motifs are likely important for their substrate recognition and binding specificity.
Structural superimposition of all human CLKs protein crystal structures demonstrated that their kinase domains share very similar topological features[3],[26],[27] (Fig.). Thus, CLK inhibitors are typically ATP mimetics that exert their activity through binding within the ATP pocket. As shown in Fig., the inhibitor generally contains aromatic heterocycles which are sandwiched between hydrophobic residues (L167, V175 in CLK1) of the N-lobe and hydrophobic residues (L295, V324 in CLK1) of the C-lobe resemble the binding of the adenine ring system of ATP co-factor.[28] Chemical modifications within the ring of the inhibitors form hydrogen bonds with the main chain atom of the hinge region. The DFG sequence motif in the C-lobe was shown to be essential for inhibitor and substrate binding. It has been reported that the DFG-1 residue (Val in CLK1, 2, 4) is substituted by a shorter side chain Ala in CLK3, which leads to the increased size of the CLK3 binding cavity. This subtle difference has resulted in the development of selective inhibitors on CLK1, −2, and −4 instead of CLK3[27] (Fig.). Further electrostatic surface calculations showed distinct charge distributions in the binding pocket, indicating that this is likely another important element for selectivity which can be considered during drug design. Taken together, the subtle structural differences in the inhibitor binding site should be considered when designing selective CLK inhibitors in the future.
Biological function of CLKs
CLKs in regulation of the splicing process
Alternative splicing is a biological phenomenon that enables the generation of multiple mRNA and protein products from a single gene.[25] Five main types of AS are currently known: ES (exon skipping), IR (intron retention), MXE (mutually exclusive exon), A5SS (alternative 5′ splice site), and A3SS (alternative 3′ splice site).[29],[30] The spliceosome is an enzymatic machine that is required to splice pre-mRNA.[31] Spliceosome formation is the result of complex interactions between small nuclear ribonucleoproteins (snRNPs, including U1, U2, U4/U6, and U5) and more than 150 additional proteins.[32] In addition, different RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) take part in alternative splicing, including SR proteins and heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein (hnRNP) family proteins.[31]–[35] CLKs and SR-specific protein kinases (SRPKs) are largely responsible for phosphorylating the RS dipeptide repeat domains of the SR protein families (SRSF1–12).[36] Once phosphorylated, SR proteins regulate RNA splicing and participate in multiple physiological functions.[37],[38] Besides, other splicing-related factors, such as RBM (RNA binding motif) proteins, are also involved in generating mature mRNA through the process of alternative splicing.[35] Additionally, ~95% of human genes transcribe multiple mRNA isoforms by differential inclusion of exons.[39] Here, we discuss the involvement of CLKs in regulating the splicing process through phosphorylating splicing-related proteins.
Human CLK1 was shown to regulate the cellular distribution of the SR family proteins via the phosphorylation of their respective C-terminus (Figs. and). Among these factors, SRSF1 is a well-characterized downstream substrate of CLKs.[25] The N-terminus of CLK1 was shown to interact with SRSF1 through its RS domain which was necessary for the hyperphosphorylation of SRSF1. This process further facilitates the binding of SRSF1 to its RNA target Ron ESE (AGGCGGAGGAAGC), an RNA oligomer designed by the SRSF1 exonic enhancer sequence.[25] A phosphoproteomic analysis of gastric tumor and patient-derived xenograft (PDX) samples identified that SRSF2 was hyperphosphorylated in tumor samples. Inhibition of CLK1 by inhibitors or siRNA downregulated CLK1-dependent SRSF2 splicing activity, resulting in a reduced cell proliferation, invasion, and migration of gastric cancer.[40] The results indicate the involvement of SRSF2 in CLK1 modulating splicing signals.[40] SRSF1 was also shown to be a substrate of CLK2, and its phosphorylation status was observed to be closely related to the expression of CLK2, which is essential for its nuclear localization and splicing functions.[41],[42] A CLK3-HMGA2 alternative splicing axis was discovered to promote the stemness potential of human hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) in vitro and in vivo.[43] The finding illustrated that CLK3 promoted the skipping of HMGA2-L exon in a SRSF1-dependent manner to reinforce an HSC-specific program. Mutated SRSF1 binding motif within HMGA2-L exon 4 disrupted CLK3 regulated skipping of HMGA2-L through SRSF1, providing a direct molecular link between CLK3 and SRSF1.[43] CLK1 phosphorylated SRSF4 and SRSF6 during insulin stimulation resulting in protein kinase C βII (PKCβII) pre-mRNA alternative splicing which subsequently participated in insulin-stimulated actin rearrangements. In addition, CLK1 overexpression promoted exon 17 inclusion splicing and increased the expression of PKCβII through phosphorylation of SR proteins in response to insulin stumilization.[5] It was reported that CLK1 phosphorylated SRSF5 on Ser 250, thereby, affecting alternative splicing of METTL14 and Cyclin L2 to promote cell metastasis and viability in pancreatic cancer.[44] Inhibition of the CLKs enzymatic activities preferentially inhibited the phosphorylation of SRSF10 at Ser 129, 131, and 133 eliciting p53-dependent apoptosis in human colorectal cancer cells. Moreover, the interaction between CLK1 and SRSF10 was confirmed by a GST-pull-down assay.[45]Fig. 2Biology function of CLKs. CLKs participate in biological processes by modulating splicing and non-splicing functions. CLKs are activated, phosphorylated or regulated by c-Myc, AKT or 14–3–3τ, or negatively regulated by miRNAs. CLKs affect their downstream effectors by phosphorylating serine, threonine, or tyrosine residues to activate cellular splicing and non-splicing processes. Alternative splicing of certain genes is increased in response to protein phosphorylation by CLKs. Targets of CLKs include SR proteins, SPF45, and/or U1–70K or modulated RBFOX2. Consequently, different protein isoforms that function in multiple cellular processes are generated. CLKs promote cytokinesis, increase c-myc activity, and suppress fatty acid metabolism by phosphorylating downstream Aurora B, USP13, and PGC-1α. The activation of Wnt/β-catenin and Hippo signaling by increased expression of Wnt 3a or YAP further highlights the importance of CLKs in non-splicing processes. The figure was generated using Figdraw (www.figdraw.com)Fig. 3The direct upstream and downstream regulators of CLKs. The expression or activities of CLKs are directly regulated by the upstream proteins such as AKT, c-Myc, or miRNAs. CLKs phosphorylate or modulate their downstream targets, which have been demonstrated in publications, to participate in pivotal processes. The upstream and downstream regulators of CLK1 (a), CLK2 (b), CLK3 (c), and CLK4 (d) have been shown in the figure seperately. The figure was generated by Figdraw (www.figdraw.com)
In addition, CLK kinases were shown to phosphorylate the spliceosome-associated splicing factor 45 (SPF45).[46],[47] CLK1 phosphorylated SPF45 at eight different Ser residues, facilitating cell migration and invasion in a phosphorylation-dependent manner on SKOV-3 cells. Furthermore, CLK1 enhanced SPF45-induced Fas mRNA exon 6 exclusion to facilitate serum-stimulated cell migration, whereas inhibition of CLK1 promoted SPF45 degradation and inhibited malignant phenotype in a proteasome-dependent manner.[46] CLK1 was reported to phosphorylate U1–70K at the C-terminal Ser226 residue, facilitating U1–70K release from subnuclear granules and its subsequent interaction with U1 snRNP and SRSF1 for early spliceosomal protein assembly.[48] Furthermore, SR protein kinase 1 (SRPK1) dissociated CLK1 from U1–70K to recycle kinase catalysis.[48] Elevated CLK2 mRNA levels were observed in luminal and HER2 + breast cancer cell lines as well as the EGFR-amplified MDA-MB-468 and EGF-dependent MCF10DCIS triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) cell lines. CLK2 promoted the inclusion skipping at exon 11a of mesenchymal-type ENAH in luminal breast cancer cells through the modulation of RBFOX2 as opposed to SRSF1.[42] The usage of ENAH exon 11a affected by CLK2 subsequently implied cell growth, migration, and invasion in breast cancer.[42]
CLKs in regulation of the nonsplicing process
Besides splicing, the CLKs are involved in other biological functions via phosphorylation of their substrates (Figs. and). CLK1, −2, and −4 are required for Aurora B activation via its phosphorylation at the Ser331 residue during late cytokinesis in normally segregating cells.[2] Phosphorylation of protein-tyrosine phosphatase (PTP-1B) at Ser50 by CLK1 and CLK2 promoted its enzymatic activity in 32P-labeled in vitro kinase assay, phosphatase assays, and co-transfection experiment in HEK293 cells.[49] CLK2 phosphorylated PGC-1α at 11 Ser residues along its SR domain, resulting in the repression of PGC-1α transcriptional activity on gluconeogenic genes and the disruption of the physical interaction of PGC-1α with MED1. This biological process was found to attenuate PPARα transcription, decrease fatty acid oxidation, promote fatty liver disease, and suppress hepatic gluconeogenesis.[22],[50]
AKT kinase exhibits a complex regulatory relationship with CLK1 and CLK2.[5],[50]–[53] CLK1 is a preferred substrate of AKT; the AKT phosphorylation site on CLK1 is located in its N-terminal unstructured SR domain but not the kinase domain.[5],[53] Mutation of the predicted AKT phosphorylation sites of CLK1 to alanine residues (Ser36, Thr122, and Ser139 mutated to Ala) increased PCKβII level throughout the preadipocyte differentiation to mature adipocytes process in 3T3-L1 cells. Furthermore, the S36A mutation of CLK1 resulted in the reduction of SRSF1 and SRSF2 phosphorylation, the T122A mutation led to decrease of SRSF5 phosphorylation, and the S139A mutation contributed to the diminished phosphorylation of SRSF4, SRSF6, SRSF5 as well as SRSF1 and SRSF2 in 3T3-L1 preadipocytes.[53] Consequently, the adipogenesis program was blocked prior to differentiation in cells transfected with both CLK1 single mutants and CLK1-AAA mutations.[53] AKT was also found to stabilize CLK2 through phosphorylation of CLK2 at Ser34 and Thr127 residues to enhance cell proliferation and block cell apoptosis in response to ionizing radiation.[52] In turn, CLK2 was found to phosphorylate the regulatory subunit B56β of phosphatase 2 A (PP2A), which was required to drive AKT-PP2A complex formation that results in AKT dephosphorylation at the Ser473 and Thr308 residues.[50],[51] Moreover, CLK2 kinase activity was induced by AKT phosphorylation at Thr343 residue of the CLK2 activation loop in response to insulin and feeding in hepatic gluconeogenesis. Once CLK2 was activated, it underwent auto-phosphorylation to stabilize itself.[50] Altogether, these results suggested that CLK2 functions as both an up-stream regulator and down-stream substrate of AKT, which operates as a self-regulatory loop. However, this function was probably cell type-specific because no experimental evidence confirming the interaction between CLK2 and AKT was identified in human breast cancer cells.[42] In addition, murine CLK2 is auto-phosphorylated at a highly conserved auto-phosphorylation Ser141 site that influences its subnuclear localization; the subcellular localization is suspected to impact substrate interaction properties of CLK2.[54] Besides, proteasomal degradation of CLK2 was decreased in glioma stem cells (GSCs) through binding with 14–3–3τ protein.[55] Moreover, AKT/ Forkhead box O3a (FOXO3a) /p27 pathway was identified to participate in GSCs growth inhibition which caused by CLK2 knocking down.[55] Apart from this, CLK4 bound with nexilin (NEXN) and phosphorylated it at Ser437 to regulate cardiac function, subsequently reversing pathological cardiomyocyte hypertrophy.[56]
In summary, the role of CLKs in splicing or non-splicing processes is complex and diverse. The general function of CLKs requires the interaction with or phosphorylation of their downstream or upstream proteins. In this review, we summarize the crucial related proteins and potential functions of CLKs in the regulation of cell growth, metastasis, fatty acid oxidation or cardiac function maintain by affecting the activities of downstream proteins (Table, Figs., and). However, further investigation of CLKs in modulating different proteins or signaling pathways is needed to comprehensively understand the roles that CLKs play in physiological and pathological processes.Table 1Regulators of CLK proteinsNameInteractionSubtypesBiological functionRef.Downstream regulatorsSRSF1Downstream of CLK1HyperphosphorylationHyperphosphorylation of SRSF1 by CLK1 furtherly facilitated the binding of SRSF1 to Ron ESE[25]Downstream of CLK2PhosphorylationDownregulated CLK2 expression decreased the phosphorylation status of SRSF1to inhibit its splicing function[41],[42]Downstream of CLK3Splicing modulationCLK3 strongly affected HMGA2 isoforms switching in an SRSF1-dependent manner[43]SRSF2Downstream of CLK1Splicing modulationCLK1 inhibition decreased SRSF2 expression and downregulated CLK1-dependent SRSF2 splicing activity in gastric cancer cells[40]SRSF4 and SRSF6Downstream of CLK1PhosphorylationCLK1(Clk/Sty) phosphorylated SRSF4 and SRSF6 during insulin stimulation resulting in exon 17 inclusion and elevated expression of PKCβII[5]SRSF5Downstream of CLK1Phosphorylation at Ser250CLK1 promoted alternative splicing of METTL14 and Cyclin L2 in pancreatic cancer[44]SRSF10Downstream of CLK1Phosphorylation at Ser129, 131 and 133CLKs modulated the tumorigenic activity of SRSF10 in human colorectal cancer cells[45]SPF45Downstream of CLK1Phosphorylation at eight serine residuesCLK1 enhanced SPF45-induced Fas mRNA exon 6 exclusionInhibition of CLK1 promoted SPF45 degradation via proteasome-dependent proteolysis[46],[47]U1–70KDownstream of CLK1Phosphorylation at Ser226Facilitated U1–70K released from subnuclear granules and subsequent interaction with U1 snRNP and SRSF1[48]RBFOX2Downstream of CLK2Splicing modulationMediated mesenchymal-type ENAH splicing at exon 11a[42]PTP-1BDownstream of CLK1/2Phosphorylation at Ser50Activated PTP-1B and modulated the enzymatic activity[49]B56βDownstream of CLK2PhosphorylationPhosphorylation of B56β by CLK2 leads to AKT dephosphorylation at Ser473 and Thr308 sites[50],[51]PGC-1αDownstream of CLK2Phosphorylation at 11 serine residues on SR domainDisrupted the PGC-1α–MED1 interaction and reduced MED1 recruitment to PPARα/PGC-1α promoter resulting in decreased fatty acid oxidationCLK2 phosphorylated the SR domain of PGC-1α to repress PGC-1α transcriptional activity on gluconeogenic genes in hepatic gluconeogenesis[49],[50][22],[50]USP13Downstream of CLK3Phosphorylation at Y708Promoted USP13 binding with c-Myc, resulting in the activation of purine metabolic gene transcription in CCA[124]NEXNDownstream of CLK4Phosphorylation at Ser437CLK4 phosphorylated NEXN at Ser437 to participate in cardiac function regulation[56]MITFDownstream of CLK4Phosphorylation at Tyr360CLK4 phosphorylated MITF at Tyr360 to promote the degradation of MITF[126]Aurora BDownstream of CLKsPhosphorylation at Ser331Activated Aurora B during late cytokinesis in normally segregating cells[2]Upstream regulatorsAKTUpstream of CLK1Phosphorylation CLK1 at SR domain (Ser36, Thr122 and Ser139)AKT phosphorylated the SR domain of CLK1[53]Upstream of CLK2Phosphorylation CLK2 at Ser34, Thr127 and Thr343AKT bond and phosphorylated CLK2 at Ser 34 and Thr 127 in response to ionizing radiationAKT phosphorylated CLK2 at Thr343 in response to insulin stimulation in hepatic gluconeogenesis[50]–[52]Insulin stimuliUpstream of CLK2Phosphorylation CLK2 at Ser342 and Thr343CLK2 kinase activity was induced by insulin at Ser342/Thr343 in hepatic gluconeogenesis[50]miR-573Upstream of CLK2RegulatormiR-573 bond directly with CLK2 and significantly inhibited the expression of CLK2[121]14–3–3τUpstream of CLK2Regulator14–3–3τ bond with CLK2 to prevent the proteasomal degradation of CLK2 and increase protein stabilization in glioma stem cells[55]c-MycUpstream of CLK3Transcriptional activatorc-Myc overexpression enhanced CLK3 expression[124]miR-144Upstream of CLK3RegulatormiR-144 post-transcriptionally regulated CLK3 to suppress Wnt/β-catenin signaling in hepatocellular carcinoma[125]MITFUpstream of CLK4Regulator (Feedback loop)MITF bond to the E-boxes in the CLK4 promoter to reduce CLK4 transcript expression in ESCC[126]
CLKs and human diseases
The CLKs exert important functions and participate in various human noncancer diseases and cancer development through splicing or non-splicing processes.[57],[58] Here, we documented the functions of CLKs and addressed the therapeutic potential of targeting CLKs in various human diseases (Tables – and Figs. –).Table 2Summary of CLKs and associated therapeutic strategies in human non-cancer diseasesHuman diseasesCompoundsTargetsPhenotypeMechanismCellular modelAnimal modelRef.Neurodegenerative diseasesAlzheimer’s disease (AD)\Human and murine CLK2The expression and activity of CLK2 led to the misregulation of tau exon 10 splicing which contributed to ADCLK2 related alternative splicing of tau exon 10 was regulated by phosphorylating SR proteinsTransfection of CLK2 plasmids at 2 μg significantly increased the skipping of exon 10 of tau in HEK293 cells\[59]–[62]Phelan-McDermid syndrome (PMDS)TG003CLK2CLK2 targeting improved autism and neuronal functions in PMDSTG003 recovered spine density in Shank3-deficient neurons by targeting CLK210 μM TG003 rescued spine density in Shank3 deficient neurons\[64]Indazole 1 and Indazole 2CLK2Indazole 1 and -2 elevated spine density in Shank3-deficient neurons by targeting CLK2Indazole 1 and -2 significantly improved spine density at 300 nM and 1 µM.\[63]Duchenne muscular dystrophyDuchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD)TG003CLKs and SRp30c/SRSF9TG003 promoted exon skipping only in the c.4303 G > T mutant cells to generate partially functional dystrophin proteinDephosphorylation of SR protein(s) cooperated with hnRNP A1 to act as a co-inhibitor during the recognition of exon 31, resulting in functional dystrophin proteinUp to 50 μM of TG003 promoted exon 31 skipping in mutated Hela cells and showed no cytotoxicity to cellsUp to 100 mg/kg per day per os showed no toxicity to mice[68]TG693CLK1TG693 promoted the skipping of exon 31 and restored dystrophin expression in patient cells harboring the c.4303 G > T mutationTG693 targeted CLK1 to reduce downstream SR proteins phosphorylation, resulting in exon-skipping therapy in DMDTG693 inhibited the phosphorylation of SRSF4 at 5 μM and SRSF6 at 20 μM by targeting CLK1.Up to 20 μM of TG693 promoted the skipping of exon 31 and upregulated dystrophin expression in patient cells harboring c.4303 G > T mutationOral administration of 30 mg/kg TG693 reduced SRs phosphorylation, particularly SRSF4 in miceNo apparent acute toxicity in rats at up to 100 mg/kg per os[67]Inflammatory diseasesTendinopathySM04755CLK2 and DYRK1ASM04755 treatment or knock-down of CLK2 prevented tendon destruction and promoted tendon regeneration in tendinopathySM04755 led to intron retention in the mRNA of Wnt pathway genes; decreased tenocyte catabolic enzyme expression; inhibited inflammatory signaling mediators NF-κB and STAT3 by targeting CLK2 and DYRK1A0.3 μM of SM04755 inhibited inflammatory cytokine production and protected tenocytes from the catabolic breakdown0.3 mg/cm2 of SM04755 inhibited inflammation and promoted tendon healing in a collagenase-induced acute tendinopathy model in rats[69]Knee osteoarthritis (OA)LorecivivintCLK2 and DYRK1AInhibition or knock-down of CLK2 induced chondrocyte differentiation and suppressed cartilage catabolic enzyme expressionLorecivivint inhibited CLK2-mediated phosphorylation of SR splicing factors and DYRK1A-mediated phosphorylation of SIRT1 and FOXO1Lorecivivint inhibited IL-6 and TNF-α production in IL-1β and LPS-stimulated synovial fibroblasts, and LPS-stimulated THP-1 cells in a dose-dependent mannerIntra-articular injection of lorecivivint (0.1 mg, 0.3 mg, 1 mg) decreased phospho-SRSF, phospho-SIRT1, phospho-FOXO1, and phospho-STAT3 in the ACLT + pMMx model and the MIA model of rat knee OA[71],[72]Viral replicationHIV-1 virusChlorhexidineCLK3 and CLK4, slightly activity against CLK2CLK3 and CLK4 promoted the expression of HIV-1 Gag and viral RNA abundanceChlorhexidine significantly inhibited HIV-1 Gag synthesis and suppressed HIV-1 regulatory protein Rev accumulation to prevent virus replication2.5 μM of chlorhexidine significant repressed HIV-1 replication did not significantly impact cell viability in PBMCsChlorhexidine was suggested to applicate on mucosal surfaces to establish well toleration to block HIV-1 in human[81]Influenza A virus (IAV)NIH39CLK1Inhibition or knock-down of CLK1 reduced the replication of influenza A/WSN/33NIH39 reduced viral NS mRNA splicing ratio and inhibited viral M1, M2, and NS1 protein levels to suppress viral replicationNIH39 showed antiviral activity with an IC50 of 6.6 μM and reduced viral mRNA splicing and related protein expression at 12.5 μM in A549 cellsCLK1−/− mice showed a reduction of viral replication compared to wild-type C57BL/6 mice[83]J12098 (Corilagin)CLK1J12098 exhibited anti-influenza ability by targeting CLK1J12098 showed better docking to CLK1 and closely interacted with CLK1J12098 exerted anti-influenza virus effect with EC50 values of 2.0 ± 2.22 μg/mL a CC50 value of 153.54 μg/mL in vitro\[86]J14848 (Pinosylvin)CLK1J1484 exhibited anti-influenza ability in vitro by targeting CLK1J14848 showed better docking to CLK1 and closely interacted with CLK1J14848 exerted an anti-influenza virus effect with EC50 values of 5.28 ± 2.45 μg/mL and a CC50 value of 18.26 μg/mL in vitro\[86]J10688 (Clypearin)CLK1J10688 exerted anti-influenza virus activity in vivo and in vitro by potently targeting CLK1J10688 impaired the synthesis of viral proteins NP and M2 and downregulated the phosphorylation of splicing factors SF2/ASF and SC35J10688 exerted an anti-influenza virus effect with EC50 values of 1.2 ± 0.28 μg/mL and a CC50 value of >200 μg/mL3, 10, and 30 μM of J10688 remarkably decreased the NP and M2 expression and reduced the copy number of viral RNA synthesis in a dose-dependent mannerMice intravenous treated with 30, 10, and 3 mg/kg/day J10688 showed 91.67% survival rates, whereas all mice died in the normal saline group within 9 daysJ10688 administration reduced lung virus titer, enhanced immunological function, and alleviated influenza-induced acute lung injury[86],[87]Autophagy-associated diseasesAutophagy-associated diseasesLeucettine L41CLK1Leucettine L41 triggered the accumulation of LC3 foci and autophagy by targeting CLK1Leucettine L41 treatment induced a 150-fold increase of the exon 4-containing CLK1 mRNA to inhibit the activity of CLK1 and induce autophagyLeucettine L41 induced LC3 foci formation and triggered autophagy in U-2 OS cells without modifying the autophagic flux\[100]Compound 9eCLK1Compound 9e was an efficient inducer of autophagyCompound 9e redistributed the location of SR proteins and induced the formation of autophagosome in SKOV-3 cells by targeting CLK1Compound 9e treatment converted LC3I to LC3II and formed autophagosomes in vitro\[91]CLK1-IN-1CLK1CLK1-IN-1 treatment increased autophagic flux and induced autophagyCLK1-IN-1 treatment reduced the phosphorylation and affected the subcellular redistribution of the downstream SR proteinsCLK1-IN-1 elevated the expression level of LC3II protein as well as the ratio of LC3II to LC3I in a dose- and time- dependent mannerCLK1-IN-1 showed hepatoprotective effects on the APAP-induced acute liver injury mouse model.[104]Other diseasesPathological cardiac hypertrophy\CLK4CLK4 deletion led to pathological cardiac hypertrophyCLK4 regulated cardiac function through phosphorylation of NEXN at Ser437 to restore heart failureCLK4 formed a complex with downstream NEXN and phosphorylated it at Ser437Exogenous overexpression of the NEXN (S437E) phosphorylation-mimic mutant in Clk4-cKO mice via AAV9 injection reversed the pathological phenotype induced by CLK4 knockout[56]Hyperglycemia\CLK2CLK2 was induced by insulin/AKT and acted as a suppressor of hepatic gluconeogenesisThe activated CLK2 phosphorylated PGC-1α at SR domain to repress PGC-1α transcriptional activity on gluconeogenic genesInsulin/AKT phosphorylated CLK2 at Ser342/Thr343 to stabilize CLK2.CLK2 was downregulated in the diabetic and obese db/db mice (Leprdb/Leprdb). Re-introduction of CLK2 in the livers of db/db mice dramatically restored the glucose phenotype[50]Circadian body-temperature oscillationsTG003CLK1/4CLK1/4 acted as molecular thermometers in response to circadian body-temperature oscillationsTG003 administration abolished the re-phosphorylation of SRSF5 and SRSF6 as well as exon inclusion and intron retention events during the shift of temperature from 42 °C to 35 °C by targeting CLKsHEK293 cells with 35 °C TG003 treatment showed a similar temperature dependent AS as 39 °C DMSO samplesAlligator CLK4 activity decreased with the temperature increasing from 27 °C to 35 °C.Turtle CLK1 showed full activity below 26 °C but lost 90% activity above 31 °CTG003 prevented the increased intron retention at a colder temperature[109],[110]os oral solutionTable 3Summary of expression status, function, and mechanism of CLKs in different cancer typesKinaseCancer typeExpression statusIdentified gene functionPhenotypeMechanismRef.CLK1Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC)UpregulatedOncogenePromoted PC cell growth and metastasis in vitro and in vivoAssociated with poor prognosis in PDACCLK1 enhanced phosphorylation on SRSF5Ser250, which inhibited METTL14exon10 skipping while promoting Cyclin L2exon6.3 skipping to promote cancer cell metastasis and proliferation[40],[44]Prostate cancer (PC)UpregulatedOncogeneInhibition of CLK1 decreased cell proliferation and apoptosis in PC3 and DU145 cell linesCLK1 and CLK3 expression was consistently induced in hypoxic conditions in PC3 cellsAlternative splicing in cancer related genes: C ENPE, ESCO2, CKAP2, MELK, ASPH and CD164, which contributed to TG003-inhibited cell growth inhibition by targeting CLK1CLK1 promoted cancer cell adaption to hypoxia by regulating CASP9 alternative splicing[119],[120]Gastric cancerUpregulatedOncogeneCLK1 overexpressed and promoted cell proliferation, migration, and invasion in gastric cancerCLK1 promoted gastric cancer by modulating its related splicing machinery pathways[40]Ovarian cancer/OncogeneCLK1 phosphorylated SPF45 to elevate SPF45 expression and promote ovarian cancer migration and invasionCLK1 phosphorylated SPF45 to increase SPF45 expression and promote SPF45-induced exon 6 exclusion of Fas mRNA in SKOV3 breast cancer cells[46]CLK2Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)UpregulatedOncogenePromoted NSCLC occurrence and developmentCLK2 overexpression promoted NSCLC growth and acted as a biomarker; miR-573 negatively regulated CLK2 expression in NSCLC[121]Breast cancer (BC)UpregulatedOncogenePromoted BC growth and EMT phenotype in luminal breast cancerPharmacological inhibition of CLK2 decreased cell growth and promoted apoptosis in an allograft model of Myc-driven spontaneous breast cancerCLK2 overexpression generated high levels of cyclin B1, CDK1, phospho-Rb, and activated hippo signaling pathwayCLK2 promoted the EMT variant of ENAH to facilitate breast tumor invasion and metastasisCLK2 inhibition changed the AS of genes involved in cell cycle, DNA repair, RNA splicing, and RNA transport pathways[42],[122]Glioblastoma and glioma stem-like cell (GSC)UpregulatedOncogeneDepletion of CLK2 expression arrested cell cycle at G1 and S phaseKnockdown of CLK2 downregulated AKT/FOXO3a/p27 signaling to interrupt cell cycle and reduce tumor growthDownregulation of CLK2 decreased the binding affinity of CLK2 with 14–3–3τ, but increased its affinity to phospho-PP2A[55],[123]CLK3Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA)UpregulatedOncogenePromoted c-Myc-mediated purine synthesis in CCAQ607R mutation of CLK3 induced USP13 Y708 phosphorylation, promoted USP13 binding to c-Myc and enhanced c-Myc activity[124]Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)UpregulatedOncogeneIncreased cell proliferation, migration, and invasion in vitro and tumor development in vivoCLK3 promoted Wnt 3a expression and activated Wnt/β-catenin cascades in HCC[125]Hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs)/OncogeneReinforced an HSC-specific programCLK3 effected HMGA2 isoform switching; knock-down of CLK3 decreased HMGA2-S but increased HMGA2-L through SRSF1[43]CLK4MES-TNBCUpregulatedOncogenePromoted MES-TNBC cell invasion, tumor metastasis, and CSC propertiesCLK4 promoted MES-TNBC by overexpression or modulation of TGF-β signaling via SMAD3[114]ESCCDownregulatedSuppressorCLK4 was downregulated in ESCC cells and patient samples. The function of CLK4 in suppressing ESCC development associated with the methylation status of its promoterCLK4 phosphorylated MITF at Y360 and blocked MITF-enhanced de novo purine synthesis and redox balance[126]Table 4Structure and molecular function of CLKs inhibitorsCompound nameChemical formulaStructureTargets (IC50 or Kd values)Administration efficiencyClinical trial status and efficacyRef.In vitroIn vivoSM08502C24H25N7O8 nM on CLK12 nM on CLK222 nM on CLK31 nM on CLK42–13 nM on DYRKs1.1 μM on CDK1SM08502 inhibited CLKs activity, decreased SRSF phosphorylation, and reduced the generation of splicing variants of Wnt signal pathway genes in gastrointestinal cancerOral administration of 6.25 ~ 25 mg/kg SM08502 by QD or QOD inhibited gastrointestinal tumor growth and decreased SRSF phosphorylation in xenograft mouse modelsPhase I (NCT03355066)OngoingPhase I (NCT05084859)Ongoing[12],[127]TG003C13H15NO2S20 nM on mCLK1200 nM on mCLK215 nM on mCLK4No activity on mCLK3No activity on SRPK1, SRPK2 and PKCTG003 reduced cell proliferation, invasion, and migration in gastric and prostate cancer cellsTG003 inhibited CLK/STY kinases activities and suppressed phosphorylation of SR proteins in Hela cell lineIntraperitoneal administration of TG003 twice per week decreased prostate cancer CDX growthNO[40],[47],[119],[128]T-025C21H18N80.096 nM on CLK24.8 nM on CLK16.5 nM on CLK30.61 nM on CLK40.074 nM on DYRK1 1.5 nM on DYRK1BT-025 was more effective on cells with high CLK2 expression and Myc-amplification in a dose-dependent manner; facilitating activation of downstream SE events50 mg/kg T-025 strongly suppressed the growth of breast tumor allograft modelNO[122]DB18C24H18ClN7O311 nM on CLK127 nM on CLK21280 nM on CLK320 nM on CLK4120 nM on DYRK1ADB18 showed high inhibitory effects on MCF-7 and PC3 cell lines; weaker inhibitory effects were observed on fibroblast, HuH7, CaCo-2, MDA-MB-231, HCT116 and NCI-H727 cell linesNONO[129],[130]CLK1-IN-1C24H16FN5O2 nM on CLK131 nM on CLK28 nM on CLK4138 nM on DYRK1ACLK1-IN-1 inhibited CLK1 activation, resulting in the distribution of SR proteins and increasing autophagy and autophagic flux30 mg/kg CLK1-IN-1 had a hepatoprotective effect by decreasing ALT and AST enzyme levels in an APAP-induced hepatotoxicity mouse modelNO[104]CLK-IN-T3C28H30N6O20.67 nM on CLK115 nM on CLK2110 nM on CLK3260 nM on DYRK1A230 nM on DYRK1BT3 induced apoptosis and G2/M cell cycle arrest in A2780 and HCT116 cells; synergistically induced apoptosis with Bcl-xL/Bcl-2 inhibitorNONO[131],[132]KH-CB19C15H13Cl2N3O219.7 nM on CLK1530 nM on CLK355.2 nM on DYRK1AKH-CB19 suppressed the phosphorylation of SRp75, SRp55 and SRp20; reduced flTF and asHTF expression; attenuated TNF-α-induced TF mRNA splice variants in HMEC-1 cellsNONO[117]Cpd-1C21H20F3N7O16 nM on CLK145 nM on CLK261 nM on SRPK175 nM on SRPK210000 nM on SRPK3Cpd-1, cpd-2, and cpd-3 compounds decreased endogenous phosphorylation of SR proteins and enlarged the nuclear speckles in MDA-MB-468 cells; resulting in splicing alterations of S6K and subsequent S6K protein depletionNONO[133]Cpd-2C20H20N6O1.1 nM on CLK12.4 nM on CLK2>100 nM on SRPK1/2/3[133]Cpd-3C21H21N5O21.1 nM on CLK12.1 nM on CLK2>100 nM on SRPK1/2/3[133]MU1210C22H16N4O8 nM on CLK120 nM on CLK212 nM on CLK4>3000 nM on CLK329 nM on HIPK2159 nM on HIPK3187 nM on HIPK1213 nM on DYRK1A956 nM on DYRK1B1309 nM on DYRK2MU1210 attenuated MCF-7 cell proliferation and exhibited an IC50 of 4.6 μM in cell viabilityNONO[134]Indazole1C19H24N4O12 nM on CLK110 nM on CLK22250 nM on CLK312 nM on CLK473 nM on DYRK1AIndazole1 increased the frequency of MNBN in a dose-dependent manner through CLKs inhibition in primary human lymphocytesNONO[63]KuWal151C16H11ClN2O88 nM on CLK1,510 nM on CLK228 nM on CLK4Inactive on CLK3, DYRK1A/B and DYRK2 (> 10 μM)KuWal151 exhibited less than 0.5 μM potency in more than 50 cancer cell lines, specifically in MDA-MB-435 cell line (GI50 = 72.4 nM)NONO[135]GPS167C17H13N5OSNOGPS167 impaired cell proliferation and organoids growth of human CRC cells by interrupting the phosphorylation of SRSF10NONO[45]Silmitasertib (CX-4945)C19H12ClN3O23.8 nM on CLK21 nM on CK2α and CK2α‘82.3 nM on CLK190 nM on CLK31.229 μM on SRPK1 1.111 μM on SRPK2CX-4945 inhibited CLK2 kinase activity and modulated SR protein phosphorylation with an IC50 dose between 3 to 90 nMCX-4945 treatment decreased SRSF1, SRSF4, SRSF5, and SRSF6 phosphorylation in 293 T cellsCX-4945 inhibited neoplastic animal models singly or synergistically combined with other inhibitorsPhase I/II (NCT03904862) RecruitingPhase I (NCT03897036) RecruitingNot application (NCT03571438) RecruitingPhase I/II (NCT02128282) Complete[136]CC-671C28H28N6O46 nM on CLK25 nM on TTK300 nM on CLK199 nM on DYRK3107 nM on DYRK1A157 nM on DYRK1B136 nM on PHKGLuminal breast cancer cells were more sensitive to CC-671 than TNBC cellsNONO[146]Thiophene 48C12H8N2S2110 nM on CLK1100 nM on DYRK1A70 nM on DYRK1B40 nM on DYRK2Thiophene 48 induced cell apoptosis in U2OS osteosarcoma cells at 1 μM by increasing the ratio of caspase 3/7Thiophene 48 exhibited low toxicity on V79 hamster lung fibroblasts at 5 μMNONO[147]Leucettine L41C17H13N3O371 nM on CLK164 nM on CLK460 nM on DYRK1A44 nM on DYRK1B73 nM on DYRK2720 nM on CLK2>10 μM on CLK3L41 displayed a neuroprotective role in glutamate induced HT22 cell deathL41 treatment significantly elevated the percentage of exon inclusion of the CLK1 minigene by modulating pre-mRNA splicing in Hela cellsNONO[148]–[150]QD Quaque in Die (every day, once daily), QOD Quaque omni die (every other day)Fig. 4Function of CLKs and related inhibitors in human non-cancer diseases. CLKs participate in various human non-cancer diseases including neurodegenerative diseases, inflammatory diseases, Duchenne muscular dystrophy, viral replication, autophagy-associated diseases, and other diseases. CLKs mediate the pathological processes through modulating alternative splicing or changing transcriptional activities. The figure was generated by Figdraw (www.figdraw.com)Fig. 5Expression status and clinical outcomes associated with CLKs transcript levels in different tumor types. a RNA-seq data of CLKs expression in tumor and normal tissues were obtained from the TCGA database (https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/). The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to assess statistical significance. b Raw counts of clinical survival information of CLKs were obtained from The TCGA dataset (https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/). The KM survival analysis with log-rank test was also used to compare the survival differences between the above two groups. For Kaplan–Meier curves, p values, and hazard ratio (HR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were generated by log-rank tests and univariate Cox proportional hazards regression. *, ** and *** represented p < 0.05, p < 0.01 and p < 0.001, separately. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significantFig. 6The oncogenic function of CLKs and utilization of CLKs inhibitors in cancer. a–d CLKs participate in cancer development, invasion, and metastasis by altering mRNA splicing, wnt/β-catenin signaling, TGF-β signaling, or mediating cell cycle transition. CLKs regulate cancer growth or metastasis by phosphorylating or modulating their downstream regulators, for instance, SRSF5, SPF45, USP13 SMAD3, PP2A, and other proteins. CLKs inhibitors decreased cancer growth, metastasis, metabolism, and promoted apoptosis by modulating genes participating in cell cycle, EMT, metabolic pathway, and apoptosis, respectively. e Preclinical cancer research conducted to assess the therapeutic potential of CLKs-targeting compounds showed significant tumor growth inhibitory effects. The figure was generated by Figdraw(www.figdraw.com)
CLKs in noncancer diseases and therapeutic tactics
CLKs in neurodegenerative diseases
Hyperphosphorylation and deposition of tau protein is a hallmark of sporadic Alzheimer’s disease (AD), and the dysregulation of tau exon 10 alternative splicing contributes to neurofibrillary degeneration.[59] It was also reported that irregular splicing events modulated by CLK1 or CLK2 affected the human adult nervous system contributing to sporadic AD.[4],[60],[61] CLK1-mediated phosphorylation of SR proteins at serine residues is a key mechanism that has been implicated in the development of Alzheimer’s disease.[4] In addition, the processes of tau exon 10 alternative splicing induced by phosphorylating SR proteins, and the pre-mRNA splicing changes caused by mCLK2 tended to be therapeutic concepts of tauopathies, including sporadic AD.[60],[62] Unfortunately, the author of the study did not indicate the exact SRs modulated by mCLK2 in AD. Furthermore, irregular CLK2 expression and activity were observed in AD, which resulting in misregulation alternative splicing of tau exon 10[60].
Besides, inhibition of CLK2 was proposed to be a potential therapeutic strategy in Phelan-McDermid syndrome (PMDS) by improving autism and neuronal functions.[63] The loss of ubiquitination modulation of CLK2 expression in Shank3-deficient neurons is a genetic hallmark of PMDS. Moreover, TG003 treatment exhibited a similar restorative effect on spine density with CLK2 reduction in Shank3- deficient neurons.[64] On the basis that CLK2 is a therapeutic target of PMDS, Indazole 1 and Indazole 2 were shown to increase spine density in mouse brain slices at a relatively low dose (300 nM and 1 µM) compared to TG003 (10 µM).[63]
CLKs in Duchenne muscular dystrophy
Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is a fatal progressive muscle-wasting disease. Based on current research, DMD develops due to open-reading frame disruption or dystrophin mRNA alteration caused by exon deletion or mutations.[65],[66] CLK1-regulated splicing manipulation, especially the exon-skipping function, was reported to contribute to DMD.[67] A patient harbored c.4303 G > T point mutation in dystrophin gene exon 31 changed SRp30c/SRSF9-dependent exon skipping enhancer (ESE) to hnRNP A1-dependent exon skipping silencer (ESS), thus, leading to exon 31 skipping to generate truncated, but functional dystrophin protein. Moreover, TG003, an inhibitor of CLK-1, −2, and −4, promoted dystrophin gene exon 31 skipping in patient muscle cells that harbored the c.4303 G > T point mutation (ineffective in exon 31-WT cells) and enabled the generation of partially functional dystrophin protein.[68] On the other hand, additional SR(s) which could be phosphorylated by CLKs cooperated with hnRNP A1 to recognize exon 31 during splicing after de-phosphorylation by TG003.[68] TG693, a selective CLK1 inhibitor capable of treating DMD, was discovered to be a more metabolically stable compound relative to TG0003.[67] Functionally, TG693 mediated SR protein phosphorylation and promoted mutant exon 31 skipping reading on the cells harboring the c.4303 G > T point mutation by targeting CLK1, particularly SRSF4 and SRSF6.[67] These efforts highlight the potential benefits of using CLKs-targeting compounds for the therapeutic management of genetic diseases characterized by irregular splicing, including DMD.
CLKs in inflammatory diseases
Knockdown of CLK2 promoted tenocyte differentiation by inhibiting the expression of tenocyte catabolic enzymes, indicating that targeting CLK2 may play a protective role against tendinopathy.[69] SM04755 was identified as a potent inhibitor of CLK2 and DYRK1A with an IC50 of 5.0 nM and 3.5 nM, respectively. SM04755 potently inhibited CLK2 and DYRK1A to modulate intron retention of Wnt pathway genes, subsequently suppressing Wnt signaling pathway and inhibiting the inflammatory signaling mediators NF-κB and STAT3. This process prevented tendon destruction and promoted tendon regeneration.[69]
Osteoarthritis (OA) is a disease characterized by the formation of osteophytes, cartilage degradation, and synovial inflammation.[70] CLK2 and DYRK1A participate in OA through the Wnt pathway without modulating β-catenin activity, resulting in inflammatory cytokine production and cartilage catabolic enzyme expression.[71],[72] In addition, CLK2 inhibition suppressed cartilage catabolic enzyme expression and induced early chondrocyte differentiation in human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs).[71] This finding reveals a novel role of CLK2 in promoting OA. Lorecivivint (SM04690) potently inhibited CLK2 (IC50 = 7.8 nM) and DYRK1A (IC50 = 26.9 nM) to suppress CLK2-mediated phosphorylation of SR proteins and DYRK1A-mediated phosphorylation of SIRT1 and FOXO1. Moreover, Lorecivivint exerted anti-inflammatory effect by significantly decreasing NF-κB and STAT3 activity. Lorecivivint provided both symptom relief and inflammatory modification through dual targeting of CLK2 and DYRK1A.[62]
A Phase I clinical trial (NCT02095548) and phase IIa proof‐of‐concept clinical trial (NCT02536833) among knee OA patients indicated that Lorecivivint appeared to be safe and well-tolerated, emphasizing the therapeutic potential of Lorecivivint in OA.[73],[74] A post hoc analysis from a phase IIb clinical trial (NCT03122860) showed that intra-articular (IA) therapy of 0.07 mg Lorecivivint in participants with knee OA showed long-lasting improvements in function and pain compared to those given placebo.[75],[76] Furthermore, other clinical trials (NCT04385303 (Phase III), NCT03928184 (Phase III), NCT03727022 (Phase II) and) have been carried out and accomplished to reveal the therapeutic potential of Lorecivivint in keen OA.
CLKs in viral replication
The HIV-1 virus significantly contributes to the global health burden and the replication of HIV-1 is the key process in the virus life cycle.[77],[78] Substantial efforts have been made to alter RNA splicing of HIV-1, and SR proteins were found to participate in viral replication.[79],[80] Therefore, studies were carried out to investigate the role that CLKs, which are located upstream of SRs, play in HIV-1 replication. CLK1 promoted the expression of HIV-1 Gag, a viral structural protein, while CLK2 significantly decreased Gag expression. However, CLK3 and CLK4 were found to only have modest effects in promoting Gag expression.[81] Application of chlorhexidine, an inhibitor of CLK2, −3, and −4 (chlorhexidine exhibits minimal activity against CLK2), significantly inhibited HIV-1 Gag synthesis and viral replication. Moreover, chlorhexidine treatment suppressed HIV-1 regulatory protein Rev accumulation to prevent the export of viral RNAs. Moreover, a phase II clinical trial (NCT00006075) was carried out at the year of 2001 to evaluate the best strength of chlorhexidine gluconate in the prevention of mother-to-child transmission (MTCT) of HIV-1 by washing the mother’s vagina and the newborn baby during birth. The trial pointed out that a 1% solution of chlorhexidine exhibited well safety, tolerance, and effectiveness in decreasing the rate of MTCT of HIV-1.[82] These findings highlight the possibility of targeting host CLKs to block HIV-1 replication.[81]
The life cycle of influenza A also relies on mRNA splicing and splicing-related factors, including CLK1.[83]–[85] Knock-down of CLK1 reduced the replication of influenza A/WSN/33 by increasing segment 7 RNA splicing and decreasing viral M1 and M2 proteins, which are essential for influenza virus replication. Furthermore, SRSF3 was identified as a key factor responsible for regulating viral RNA splicing upon CLK1 inhibition. NIH39 and KH-CB19, inhibitors of CLK1, showed antiviral activity with an IC50 of 6.6 μM and 13.6 μM, respectively. NIH39 reduced viral mRNA splicing and related protein expression at 12.5 μM. However, KH-CB19 did not show any effect even at relatively high doses of 50 and 100 μM, indicating that NIH39 may be a promising anti-viral therapeutic to combat influenza A.[83] As CLK1 was found to play a crucial role in influenza replication, screening of CLK1 inhibitors was carried out by a virtual docking program. The virtual docking program indicated that J10688 (clypearin), J12098 (corilagin), and J14848 (pinosylvin) were identified to be the most potential anti-influenza virus candidates as CLK1 inhibitors with EC50 values of 1.2 ± 0.28, 2.0 ± 2.22 and 5.28 ± 2.45 μg/mL, respectively; cytotoxic concentrations (CC50) were >200, 153.54 and 18.26 μg/mL, respectively.[86] J10688, isolated from Pithecellobium clypearia Benth, showed potent anti-influenza ability through impairing viral proteins NP and M2 synthesis and downregulating the phosphorylation of the splicing factors SF2/ASF and SC35.[87] These conclusions indicated a novel therapeutic approach that targets host CLKs to suppress viral replication.
Besides HIV-1 and influenza A, CLK1 also plays important roles in the replication of West Nile virus and chikungunya virus, making it an attractive cellular candidate for host-directed antiviral therapy.[88]–[90]
CLKs in autophagy-associated diseases
Autophagy is an important cellular process that protect cells from death and maintain homeostasis through the selective degradation of intracellular hazard.[91] Alterations in autophagic activity are associated with a wide range of human diseases, including diabetes,[92],[93] cardiovascular diseases,[94],[95] infectious[96],[97] and drug-induced organ injury.[98],[99] CLK1 has been reported to participate in the regulation of the autophagy process. CLK1 inhibition by 10 μM concentration of Leucettine L41 (inhibit both DYRKs and CLKs) treatment was shown to increase LC3 foci formation and induce autophagy in a dose-dependent manner in human osteosarcoma cells U-2 OS.[100] Meanwhile, CLK1 RNA interference in U-2 OS cells resulted in elevated cell autophagy. However, Leucettine L33 (inactive on both CLK1 and DYRKs) and L38 (more potent to DYRKs) were unable to trigger autophagy in U-2 OS cells.[100] The findings highlight that CLKs inhibition contribute more to autophagy than DYRKs. Mechanistically, L41 treatment significantly elevated exon 4-containing CLK1 mRNA transcripts resulting in an increase of the full-length kinase isoform by modulating its own splicing.[100],[101] Additionally, the targeting of CLK1 by inhibitors or siRNA reagents was speculated to trigger autophagy through modulating the alternative splicing of autophagy regulator pre-mRNAs, including mTOR and X-box–binding protein 1 (XBP1).[100],[102],[103] These findings further confirm that CLK1 inhibitors are potent inducers of autophagy. Moreover, compound 9e, a drug derived from 3,6-disubstutited-imidazo [1,2-α] pyridine, potently inhibited CLK1 with an IC50 value of 4 nM compared with CLK2 (IC50 of 50 nM) and CLK4 (IC50 of 17 nM). Treatment with compound 9e induced autophagy, significantly increased autophagic flux, and affected the subcellular redistribution and phosphorylation levels of the downstream SR proteins of CLK1 in SKOV-3 cells.[91] In addition, CLK1-IN-1 was shown to induce autophagy by targeting CLK1 in the treatment of autophagy-associated diseases. The downstream SR proteins of CLK1 were redistributed from the nucleoplasm to nuclear speckles after CLK1-IN-1 treatment. Furthermore, CLK1-IN-1 induced autophagy in BNLCL.2 and SKOV-3 cells by elevating LC3II protein expression and increasing the ratio of LC3II to LC3I in a dose- and time-dependent manner by targeting CLK1.[104] Collectively, inhibition of CLK1 increased cellular autophagy, indicating its potential as a treatment strategy for autophagy-associated diseases.
CLKs in other diseases
Pathological cardiac hypertrophy is characterized by hypertrophic growth and cardiomyocyte size increase in response to pathological stimuli.[105],[106] CLK4 was found to play a pivotal role in maintaining cardiac function; the deletion of CLK4 contributed to pathological myocardial hypertrophy and heart failure.[56] Phosphorylation of NEXN at Ser437 by CLK4 was found to rescue pathological myocardial hypertrophy, which highlights the splicing-independent involvement of CLK4 in heart disease. Moreover, the finding indicated that restoration of CLK4 may act as a novel therapeutic target for treating pathological cardiac hypertrophy.[56]
Hepatic gluconeogenesis is critical for hyperglycemia in diabetes.[107],[108] CLK2 was identified as a suppressor of hepatic gluconeogenesis, and its activity was regulated by insulin/AKT.[50] Insulin/AKT stabilized CLK2 and increased its expression and activity during the feeding/fasting nutrient cycle. Mechanistically, Insulin treatment led to CLK2 phosphorylation at Ser342/Thr343 in H2.35 hepatocytes. Moreover, AKT specifically interacted with CLK2 at its kinase domain and phosphorylated CLK2 at Thr343 in response to insulin. Activated CLK2 phosphorylated PGC-1α at its SR domain to repress PGC-1α transcriptional activity on gluconeogenic genes, resulting in hepatic gluconeogenesis suppression.[50]
Furthermore, CLKs contributed to the sensing of temperature differentials through the phosphorylation of SR proteins.[109] CLK1/4 became completely inactivated at 38 °C and was re-activated at 35 °C, indicating the potential role of CLK1/4 as molecular thermometers in response to circadian body-temperature oscillations.[109],[110] TG003 application dramatically abolished the re-phosphorylation of SR proteins, such as SRSF5 and SRSF6, during the temperature shift from 42 °C to 35 °C.[109] Meanwhile, temperature-dependent AS events, including exon inclusion and intron retention, were modulated after TG003 treatment, illustrating the pivotal role of CLK1/4 in connecting body temperature with AS.[109]
To summarize, irregular splicing or expression of CLKs involved in various human diseases, for instance, Alzheimer’s disease, osteoarthritis, Duchenne muscular dystrophy, pathological cardiac hypertrophy, and gluconeogenesis. Moreover, inhibitors have been reported to have anti-inflammatory, anti-viral, and anti-neurodegenerative functions as well as other functions. Nevertheless, the clinical application of these inhibitors is in great demand which may provide direct evidence for the therapy of different human diseases.
CLKs in cancer and treatment strategies
Expression or activities change of CLKs are associated with cancer development and progression.[111]–[115] Depletion or chemical inhibition of CLKs changed alternative splicing events leading to decreased cell proliferation.[67],[116]–[118] Given the expression status and clinical significance of CLKs in The Cancer Genome Atlas Program (TCGA) database (https://portal.gdc.cancer.gov/), we systematically discuss the roles of CLKs in cancer and therapeutic effects of their related inhibitors (Table and Figs.,).
CLK1 in cancer
The expression of CLK1 was dramatically increased in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) tissues at both the mRNA and protein levels, promoting cell growth and metastasis in vitro and in vivo.[44] High expression of CLK1 was associated with poor prognosis in PDAC. Mechanistically, CLK1 was found to directly phosphorylate SRSF5 at Ser250. Consequently, this inhibited METTL14exon10 skipping (generated METTL14-L isoform) to enhance N6-methyladenosine (m6A) methylation and cancer metastasis. Additionally, Cyclin L2exon6.3 skipping (generated CCNL2-S isoform) was found to promote PDAC cells proliferation in response to SRSF5 phosphorylation at Ser250.[44] These results revealed a therapeutic option and potential prognostic value of CLK1/SRSF5 pathway in PDAC patients.
Inhibition of CLK1 decreased cell proliferation and induced apoptosis in PC3 and DU145 prostate cancer cells; the responsive AS events were validated by transcriptomic analysis.[119] The sequencing revealed the dramatic change of alternative splicing events in the following cancer related genes: centromere protein E (CENPE, inclusion at exon 38), establishment of sister chromatid cohesion N-acetyltransferase 2 (ESCO2, skipping at exon 9), cytoskeleton associated protein 2 (CKAP2, skipping at exon 3), maternal embryonic leucine zipper kinase (MELK, skipping at exon 13), aspartate β-hydroxylase (ASPH, skipping at exon 6 and 8) and CD164 (skipping at exon 5).[119] In hypoxic conditions, CLK1 and CLK3 expression were consistently induced in PC3 cells exposed to 1%, 0.2%, and 0% hypoxic environments; changes in CASP9 splicing were also observed.[120]
CLK1 was expressed at levels 10 to 30% higher in gastric tumor samples compared to normal gastric tissues.[40] In a phosphor-proteomic analysis study, CLK1 and its related splicing machinery pathway were shown to be the most important regulators in gastric cancer.[40] CLK1 was overexpressed in gastric cancer tissues and the inhibition of CLK1 resulted in the suppression of cell proliferation, migration, and invasion.[40] These findings indicate that CLK1 plays an important role in gastric cancer progression.
SPF45 was identified to be a cellular target of CLK1 in ovarian cancer.[46],[115] (LC)-electrospray ionization-tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) experiments showed that CLK1 is able to phosphorylate SPF45 at eight serine residues (Ser 48, 62, 202, 204, 222, 266, 288, and 291).[46] Furthermore, CLK1 overexpression increased SPF45 protein levels and promoted SPF45-induced exon 6 exclusion of Fas mRNA in SKOV3 breast cancer cells. Additionally, inhibition of CLK1 decreased the half-life of SPF45 via a proteasome-dependent manner in both SKOV-3 and HeLa cells. Interestingly, kinase dead Ser 48/222/266 mutants significantly increased exon 6 exclusion while Ser 202/204 A significantly decreased exon 6 exclusion compared with wild-type Myc-SPF45 in COS-1 cells. The finding further illustrates that CLK1 differentially regulates SPF45 splicing activity depending upon phosphorylation at different serine sites. Moreover, SPF45 enhanced fibronectin expression to promote ovarian cancer migration and invasion in a CLK1 phosphorylation-dependent way.[46] This finding highlights the potential use of CLK1 inhibitors to dephosphorylate SPF45 in ovarian cancer treatment.
Based upon data provided by TCGA, CLK1 is significantly overexpressed in many cancer types, including cholangiocarcinoma (CHOL), colon adenocarcinoma (COAD), head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSC), kidney renal clear cell carcinoma (KIRC), kidney renal papillary cell carcinoma (KIRP), liver hepatocellular carcinoma (LIHC), prostate adenocarcinoma (PRAD), rectum adenocarcinoma (READ) and stomach adenocarcinoma (STAD) (Fig.). In addition, CLK1 was considered to participate in the onset, progression, and evolution of cancers through different mechanisms, however, the function probably was cancer specific.
CLK2 in cancer
Increased expression of CLK2 was demonstrated to be correlated with poor prognosis in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).[121] In addition, CLK2 expression was elevated in patients with late-stage (III–IV) cancer and metastasis, indicating that CLK2 could be a potential biomarker in NSCLC. Moreover, miR-573 suppressed CLK2 expression and interrupted the occurrence and development of lung cancer caused by CLK2 overexpression.[121]
In luminal breast cancer, overexpression and amplification of CLK2 were demonstrated to promote cell proliferation, migration, invasion, and xenograft growth.[42] Breast cancers which harbored high CLK2 expression levels showed a more proliferative phenotype based on increased levels of cyclin B1, CDK1, phospho-Rb, and the activation status of hippo signaling pathway.[42] Moreover, CLK2 was found to promote the EMT variant of ENAH to facilitate breast tumor invasion and metastasis.[42] Pharmacological inhibition of CLK2 resulted in significant growth inhibition, apoptosis, and exon skip in the allograft model of Myc-driven spontaneous breast cancer.[122] RNA-seq analysis also revealed that genes involved in cell cycle, DNA repair, RNA splicing, and RNA transport pathways were modulated in alternative splicing, further indicating the potential role of AS by CLK2 in breast cancer.[122]
The cell cycle of glioblastoma cell lines with elevated CLK2 levels was arrested at G1 and S phases as a consequence of CLK2 depletion.[123] Mechanistically, knockdown of CLK2 was shown to interrupt the cell cycle in vitro through the downregulation of AKT/FOXO3a/p27 signaling, resulting in reduced glioblastoma tumor growth and prolonged survival in vivo.[123] Moreover, CLK2 expression in glioblastoma patient specimens was inversely correlated with patient survival time.[123] In addition, 14–3–3τ directly bond with CLK2 to increase CLK2 stability through modulating proteasomal degradation in glioma stem-like cells (GSCs).[55] Meanwhile, CLK2 negatively regulated PP2A activity in the GSC272 brain tumor cancer cell line. Downregulation of CLK2 led to decreased binding affinity with 14–3–3τ and increased binding affinity with phosphor-PP2A, resulting in the activation of PI3K signaling pathway. Thus, the combination of CLK2 depletion with the PI3K/mTOR inhibitor GSK2126458 significantly reduced tumor growth in GSC272-implanted mice. Furthermore, the induction of apoptosis was also observed when FGFR inhibitor (LY2874455) was administered to a CLK2 knockdown GSC mouse model.[55]
RNA-Seq data provided by the TCGA has shown that CLK2 is overexpressed in many cancer types (Fig.). Increased expression of CLK2 was correlated with poor clinical outcomes in cervical squamous cell carcinoma and endocervical adenocarcinoma (CESC), COAD and KIRC (Fig.). In conclusion, CLK2 might be an ideal therapeutic target and prognostic marker for cancer treatment.
CLK3 in cancer
CLK3 was found to be upregulated in cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) patients and plays a role in nucleotide metabolism.[124] Meanwhile, a gain of function somatic mutation Q607R was identified in CLK3 kinase domain, which induced USP13 Y708 phosphorylation and promoted USP13 binding to c-Myc. The binding was found to prevent c-Myc ubiquitination and enhance c-Myc activity, thereby, increasing c-Myc-mediated purine synthesis in CCA.[124] In turn, a CLK3-USP13-c-Myc feedback loop was identified whereby activated c-Myc increased CLK3 transcription by enhancing CLK3 promoter activity. However, the other CLKs family members were not affected by c-Myc.[124]
CLK3 was also markedly upregulated and closely associated with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) TNM stages and patient prognosis.[125] Functional analysis revealed that CLK3 promoted Wnt 3a transcription and activated Wnt/β-catenin cascades, resulting in increased HCC cell proliferation, migration, and invasion in vitro; additionally, animal experiments showed that CLK3 also increased tumor development in vivo. Moreover, the miR-144/CLK3 axis was found to further attenuate Wnt/β-catenin signaling, resulting in suppression of HCC development and metastasis.[125]
CLK3 also affected HSCs by modulating HMGA2 alternative splicing.[43] Mechanistically, CLK3 strongly affected HMGA2 isoform switching; knock-down of CLK3 decreased HMGA2-S transcription but increased HMGA2-L transcription through SRSF1. The results indicated that CLK3 was involved in regulating an SRSF1-dependent splicing pattern that enhanced the development of human HSC.[43]
Summarization from the TCGA database demonstrated that elevated expression of CLK3 was observed in CHOL, HNSC, Kidney chromophobe (KICH), KIRC, KIRP, LIHC, PRAD, and STAD. Furthermore, increased expression of CLK3 was correlated with poor overall survival (OS) outcome in COAD, indicating the clinical significance of CLK3 (Fig.). Thus, targeting CLK3 by siRNA or antagonists could be taken into consideration for further investigation.
CLK4 in cancer
CLK4 was overexpressed in mesenchymal-like TNBC (MES-TNBC) cells and correlated with poor patient survival.[114] Silencing of CLK4 in a xenograft mouse model was shown to decrease the expression of multiple epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) genes which participate in metastasis and repress tumor cell migration in TNBC cells.[114] Notably, depletion of CLK4 impaired the expression of SMAD3, a mediator of TGF-β signal transduction, suggesting that overexpression of CLK4 can promote metastatic and aggressive phenotypes in MES-TNBC cells. Furthermore, the pharmacological inhibition of CLK4 suppressed the growth and invasiveness of MES-TNBC cells, highlighting the potential utilities of CLK4 in the clinic.[114]
CLK4 was also found to be extensively downregulated in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) cells and patient samples due to the methylation of its promoter.[126] Mechanistically, CLK4 phosphorylated microphthalmia-associated transcription factor (MITF) at Tyr360 to promote the autophagy degradation of MITF. As a feedback axis, MITF bond to the E-boxes in CLK4 promoter transcriptionally downregulating the expression of CLK4 in ESCC. Moreover, CLK4 was proved to be a redox-sensitive kinase. Interestingly, impairment of CLK4 kinase activity upon oxidation of Met307 was found to enhance ESCC carcinogenesis.[126] This finding revealed a novel function of CLK4 in modulating purine synthesis and redox status in conjunction with its role in alternative splicing.
CLK4 expression varied in different cancer datasets, among which the expression was significantly elevated in CHOL, glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), HNSC, KIRC, KIRP, LIHC, PRAD, and STAD; Conversely, CLK4 transcription was reduced in BLCA, breast invasive carcinoma (BRCA), lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC), pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma (PCGC), thyroid carcinoma (THCA) and uterine corpus endometrial carcinoma (UCEC) (Fig.).
The frequency of elevated CLKs expression in gastric, prostate, lung, and cholangiocarcinoma patient tumor tissues[40],[42],[119]–[121],[124] suggests that CLKs may directly or indirectly contribute to tumor development, progression, or metastasis. Besides, mutation (CLK3)[124] or post-translational modification (CLK4) of CLK,[126] alteration of CLKs expression or function influenced tumor phenotypes. Therefore, high throughput sequencing and chemical development based on mutation sites might be an effective method to highlight clinically relevant molecular features of CLKs.
Targeting CLKs for cancer therapeutic strategies
The large body of evidence provided in this review has illustrated the major oncogenic function of CLKs in cancer. Thus, targeting CLKs has garnered increased attention from clinical researchers as a potential method of treating several cancer types. A number of inhibitors that generally bind in the CLKs ATP pocket have been extensively studied and reported (Table, Figs. and).
SM08502 (Cirtuvivint) is the first small molecular inhibitor of CLKs which underwent clinical trials. SM08502 is a potent pan-CLKs inhibitor and showed strong affinity for CLKs with IC50 values of 8 nM to CLK1, 2 nM to CLK2, 22 nM to CLK3, and 1 nM to CLK4.[127] Although SM08502 showed high affinity to CLKs, it inhibited the activity of other structurally similar kinases as well, indicating off-target effects and the potential for cytotoxicity.[12],[127] SM08502 was shown to significantly inhibit the kinase activity of CLKs and decrease SRSF phosphorylation in gastrointestinal cancers. Furthermore, SM08502 disrupted spliceosome activity, thus, reducing the generation of splicing variants of Wnt signal pathway genes.[127] Oral administration of SM08502 significantly inhibited the growth of gastrointestinal tumors. SM08502 also decreased SRSF phosphorylation and Wnt pathway gene expression in xenograft mouse models, suggesting that SM08502 is a potent therapeutic drug in cancer treatment.[127] A Phase I clinical trial of SM08502 (NCT03355066) assessing its efficacy in treating advanced solid tumors for whom no standard therapy is currently underway. This trial aimed to evaluate the safety, tolerability, PK, PD, and preliminary anti-tumor efficacy of SM08502 by oral administration. Additional clinical trials (NCT05084859) for castration-resistant prostate cancer, non-small cell lung cancer, and colorectal cancer were posted in 2021 to evaluate the safety, tolerability, PK, and preliminary anti-tumor efficacy of SM08502.
TG003, a benzothiazole compound, was found to have a potent inhibitory effect on CLK1 and CLK4 via in vitro phosphorylation assay.[128] The activities of TG003 on different CLKs and other kinases, including SRPKs and PKC, were evaluated. Results showed strong inhibitory activity of TG003 on murine CLKs (mCLKs) with IC50 values of 20 nM on mCLK1, 200 nM on mCLK2, and 15 nM on mCLK4; however, TG003 showed less inhibitory activity against mCLK3, SRPK1, SRPK2, and PKC kinases.[128] Moreover, TG003 acted on CLK1/Sty kinase competitively with ATP (Km 3.35 μM) with a Ki value of 10 nM.[128] In addition, 10 μM TG003 inhibited Clk/Sty kinase activity and SR protein phosphorylation in Hela cell.[128] TG003 was also found to inhibit CLK-dependent alternative splicing and serine/arginine-rich protein phosphorylation.[128] The application of TG003 significantly decreased gastric cancer cell viability, invasion, and migration. Similar inhibition effects were found in gastric cancer after depletion of CLK1 by small interfering RNA (siRNA).[40] Mechanistically, TG003 treatment led to the decrease of splicing protein pSRPK2, SRSF2, CLK1, and p-AKT.[40] In prostate cancer (PC), TG003 reduced cell proliferation, induced apoptosis, and reversed EMT markers in vitro; in vivo CDX tumor growth was also decreased upon treatment with TG003.[119] In addition, TG003 was found to regulate the alternative splicing of CLK1 mRNA by reducing intron 4 retention and exon 4 skipping, resulting in altered production of full-length catalytically active (CLK1T1) and truncated catalytically inactive (CLK1T2) isoforms.[47]
T‐025, a chemical modified from the 7H‐pyrrolo [2,3‐d] pyrimidine structure, was developed as a potent inhibitor of CLK2 able to bind within the ATP-binding pocket and interact with the Glu244 and Leu246 amino acid residuess.[122] The Kd values of T-025 to CLK1, -2, -3, -4 were 4.8, 0.096, 6.5, and 0.61 nM, respectively; low Kd values to DYRKS family proteins were also observed.[122] As a highly potent inhibitor to CLK/DYRK1, T-025 exhibited more than 300-fold enhanced selectivity compared with other kinases during a KINOMEScan-based kinase profiler assay.[122] T-025 was more sensitive to the cells with elevated CLK2 expression and Myc-amplification in a dose-dependent manner.[122] Additionally, 50 mg/kg T-025 strongly suppressed the growth of a breast tumor allograft model suggesting that T-025 exerts anticancer effects against Myc-driven breast cancers.[122]
DB18 is a potent inhibitor of CLK1, -2, and -4 kinases belonging to the nilino-2-quinazoline derivatives.[129] DB18 attenuated CLKs kinase activities with IC50 values of 11 nM on CLK1, 27 nM on CLK2, 1280 nM on CLK3, and 20 nM on CLK4 based on radiometric γ33P-ATP assay.[129] When screening at 10 μM concentration with 10 μM ATP, the compound also showed slight affinity to DYRK1A at 120 nM.[129],[130] Surprisingly, high DB18 concentrations (100 μM) showed no toxicity on the activity of both human and rat DYRK1A, human DYRK1B, and DYRK2. Therefore, DB18 may be considered a novel and promising CLKs selective inhibitor.[129] A cytotoxicity screening assay of DB18 was carried out in different cancer cell lines and normal human fibroblast.[129] The data demonstrated that DB18 exhibited potent cytotoxicity on MCF-7 and PC3 cell lines with IC50 values of 4 and 7 μM. Moreover, DB18 showed moderate cytotoxicity on fibroblast and HuH7 at 21 and 25 μM, and weak activity on CaCo-2, MDA-MB-231, HCT116, and NCI-H727 with IC50 higher than 25 μM.[129] The variability of DB18 efficacy across cell lines is likely dependent on the CLKs expression levels and kinase activities.
CLK1-IN-1 was designed as a potent and selective inhibitor of CLK1 with an IC50 of 2 nM. The activity of CLK1-IN-1 against its targets is highly dependent on the residues comprising the kinase domains.[104] CLK1-IN-1 strongly suppressed CLK1 kinase activity with 69-fold higher in activity compared to the inhibitory effect of CLK1-IN-1 against DYRK1A (IC50 = 138 nM).[104] CLK1-IN-1 was also shown to inhibit other CLKs activities with IC50 values of 31 nM to CLK2 and 8 nM to CLK4.[104] Treatment of BNL CL.2 (mouse embryonic liver cell) with 10 μM CLK1-IN-1 significantly inhibited CLK1 activation, resulting in the redistribution of SR proteins from the nucleoplasm to nuclear speckles, and an increase of autophagy and autophagic flux in vitro in a dose-dependent manner.[104] Meanwhile, CLK1-IN-1 elevated LC3II expression and induced autophagy and autophagic flux in a dose- and time-dependent manner in the SKOV-3 human ovarian cancer cell line, indicating its therapeutic potential for treating certain cancers.[104] Furthermore, CLK1-IN-1 (30 mg/kg) was reported to have a hepatoprotective effect by decreasing alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) expression levels in an Acetaminophen (APAP)-induced hepatotoxicity mouse model.[104]
CLK-IN-T3 exhibited dramatic inhibitory activity against CLKs with IC50 values of 0.67 nM for CLK1, 15 nM for CLK2, and 110 nM for CLK3, respectively. However, the change in CLK4 activity post-T3 treatment was not directly measured in that work.[131] DYRK1A and DYRK1B, dual specificity kinases of the CMGC sub-family, were inhibited 200–300 times less efficiently than CLKs based on kinase enzymatic assays.[131] The results of RNA-Seq analysis indicated that distinct RNA-binding motifs in skipped exons were associated with T3 treatment.[131] Meanwhile, T3 application decreased the phosphorylation of the SR proteins, which are located downstream of CLKs. T3 induced apoptosis and G2/M cell cycle arrest in human A2780 and HCT116 cells by targeting CLK.[131] Mechanically, T3 application modified AS events in cancer by decreasing the expression of the anti-apoptotic forms of cIAP1, cIAP2, XIAP, cFLIP, and Mcl-1.[132] Meanwhile, T3 synergistically induced apoptosis together with Bcl-xL/Bcl-2 inhibitor in human HCT116 and A2780 cancer cells.[132]
KH-CB19 is a potent and highly selective CLKs inhibitor that was demonstrated to strongly bind with CLK1 and CLK4 in temperature shift assays.[117] Further enzymatic assay revealed a relatively lower IC50 on CLK1 compared with IC50 values of 530 nM on CLK3 and 55.2 nM on DYRK1A.[117] KH-CB19 was revealed to bind with the ATP-binding sites of CLK1 and CLK3 based on co-crystal structures. Further experiments demonstrated that 10 μM KH-CB19 suppressed the phosphorylation of SRp75, SRp55, and SRp20 compared to TG003, which only inhibited SRp20 phosphorylation. Additionally, 10 μM KH-CB19 was able to inhibit full-length tissue factor (flTF) and alternatively spliced human tissue factor (asHTF) expression in HMEC-1 cells.[117] KH-CB20, an E/Z-mixture compound, shared the same structure and similar kinase binding affinity with E-isomer KH-CB19 with IC50 values of 16.5 nM on CLK1, 488 nM on CLK3 and 57.8 nM on DYRK1A.[117] These results illustrated the potential of KH-CB19 and KH-CB20 as lead compounds for further drug development.
Cpd-2 and cpd-3 possessed high affinity to CLK1/2 compared to SRPK1/2/3 with IC50 values of 1.1 nM (both cpd-2 and cpd-3), 2.4 nM (cpd-2) or 2.1 nM (cpd-3) on CLK1/2, while showed more than 100 nM activity dose (both cpd-2 and cpd-3) on SRPK1/2/3, separately.[133] In comparison, the IC50 values of cpd-1 are 16 and 45 nM on CLK1 and CLK2; the IC50 values of SRPK1, -2, and -3 were calculated as 61, 75, and 10000 nM. Cpd-1, cpd-2, and cpd-3 significantly decreased endogenous phosphorylation of SR proteins and enlarged the nuclear speckles in MDA-MB-468 cells. Meanwhile, the inhibitors resulted in splicing alterations of RPS6KB1(S6K) and subsequently caused S6K protein depletion.[133] Moreover, cpd-2 and cpd-3 showed considerable growth inhibition (GI50) values in different cancer cell lines: for GI50 of cpd-2, 3.0 μM on breast cancer (MDA-MB-468), 1.9 and 1.4 μM on NSCLC (A549 and NCI-H23) and 1.7, 2.2, 2.0 and 0.6 μM on colorectal cancer (COLO205, HCT116, SW620, and COLO320DM); for GI50 of cpd-3, 3.4 μM on breast cancer (MDA-MB-468), 2.6 and 2.2 μM on NSCLC (A549 and NCI-H23) and 2.1, 2.5, 2.9 and 1.5 μM on colorectal cancer (COLO205, HCT116, SW620, and COLO320DM). The data suggested that cpd compounds functioned as CLK inhibitors that exerted tumor growth inhibitory effects through splicing alterations.[133]
MU1210 is a potent inhibitor of CLKs with IC50 values of 8 nM for CLK1, 20 nM for CLK2, 12 nM for CLK4, and more than 3000 nM for CLK3; notably, off target against HIPKs and DYRKs were observed at relatively high IC50 concentration.[134] MU1210 attenuated MCF-7 cell proliferation and showed IC50 of 4.6 μM in cell viability.[134] However, the detailed biological functions and potential of MU1210 in cancer treatment are largely uncharacterized.
Indazole1 is a novel potent in-house inhibitor of CLK2 with an IC50 of 10 nM that was identified by in silico screening.[63] Indazole1 also potently inhibited CLK1, CLK3, CLK4, and DYRK1A in vitro with the IC50 values of 12 nM, 2250 nM, 12 nM, and 73 nM, respectively. Of note, the data demonstrated that Indazole1 tended to be a more potent CLKs inhibitor than TG003 by increasing the frequencies of micro-nucleated binucleates (MNBN) in a dose-dependent manner in primary human lymphocytes.[63]
KuWal151, a member of 3-Aryl-substituted 6,7-dihydropyrrolo[3,4-g]indol-8(1H)-ones class, was identified as an inhibitor of CLK1, -2 and -4 with the IC50 values for CLK1/2/4 of 88 nM, 510 nM and 28 nM, respectively.[135] Interestingly, this compound is inactive against CLK3, DYRK1A/B, and DYRK2.[135] KuWal151 showed less than 500 nM potency in more than 50 cancer cell lines, especially in the MDA-MB-435 cell line (GI50 = 72.4 nM) which exhibited heightened expression of CLK1.[135] UACC-257 cells showed the lowest CLK1 expression levels and were least sensitive to KuWal151 application with a GI value over 50 μM.[135] The sensitivities of different cancer cell lines with distinct expression levels of SPF45, an essential substrate of CLK1, to KuWal151 were determined. The results indicated that cells (HCT-116, HCT-15, HT-29, KM12, MCF-7) with increased SPF45 levels were dramatically suppressed by KuWal151. In contrast, OVCAR-8, HOP-92, and MDA-MB-431 were less sensitive to the compound under similar conditions, further proving the correlation between KuWal151 and CLK1.[135] Thus, KuWal151 might be a potential compound or suitable lead compound for the synthesis of anti-cancer agents targeting CLKs.
GPS167 is a novel CLKs inhibitor that originated from a class of compounds to interrupt HIV replication. GPS167 was subsequently identified to exhibit approximately 50% inhibition on splicing response at 2 μM.[45] A 32P-kinase assay revealed that GPS167 decreased the CLKs-mediated phosphorylation of SRSF10, but not by DRPK1 and SRPK, in a dose-dependent manner. The Colo205, SW620, and HCT116 cancer cell lines were most sensitive to GPS167 as evidenced by the results of CellTox-Green assays. However, the compound showed less cytotoxicity on CRL-1831, CRL-1790, and Caco-2 normal colonocyte cell lines.[45] Intriguingly, the inhibition of GPS167 on cell growth and viability was discovered to be p53-dependent.[45] Collectively, GPS167 is a novel inhibitor of CLKs which impairs cell proliferation and organoids growth of human CRC cells via interrupting SRSF10 phosphorylation.[45]
Silmitasertib (CX-4945) is a dual inhibitor of CLK2 and CK2. CX-4945 strongly inhibited CK2 with an IC50 value of 1 nM against CK2α and CK2α‘; however, it also had a high affinity for CLKs and DYRK1A.[136] The reported IC50 value of CX-4945 on CLK1 is 82.3 nM, on CLK2 is 3.8 nM, on CLK3 is 90 nM, and more than 1000 nM on SRPK1 and SRPK2.[136] CX-4945 was shown to be a CLK2 ATP-competitive inhibitor capable of modulating SR protein phosphorylation with an IC50 concentration ranging between 3 to 90 nM.[136] The phosphorylation status of SRSF4, SRSF6, SRSF5, and SRSF1 were profoundly decreased in 293-T cells following CX-4945 treatment, indicating that CLKs are targets of the inhibitor.[136] Surprisingly, CX-4945 showed a greater inhibitory effect than TG003, with a comparable effect on SR protein phosphorylation observed at 1 µM CX-4945 and 10 µM TG-003, suggesting the potential for treating diseases characterized by splicing dysregulation.[136] The efficacy of CX-4945 has been demonstrated in a broad range of human malignancies. CX-4945 inhibited cell proliferation and induced caspase-3 independent non-autophagic cell death in CCA Cells[137]; CX-4945 suppressed TGF-β1-induced migration and invasion in human A549 cancer cells,[138] and arrested cell cycle in vitro Moreover, CX-4945 inhibited BT-474 and BxPC-3 xenograft tumor growth in vivo in a dose-dependent way.[139] Moreover, a synergistic effect was observed when CX-4945 was combined with bortezomib to treat acute lymphoblastic leukemia[140] and multiple myeloma and mantle cell lymphoma cell lines.[141] Increased therapeutic effects were observed when CX-4945 cooperated with dasatinib in ovarian cancer;[142] cooperated with cisplatin and gemcitabine in holangiocarcinoma[143],[144] and with temozolomide in GBM.[144],[145]
A phase I/II clinical trial (NCT03904862) of CX-4945 that aims to test the safety and tolerability in individuals with recurrent medulloblastoma is currently recruiting patients. Another phase I clinical trial (NCT03897036) to evaluate the treatment duration and pharmacodynamics of CX-4945 in basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is also currently recruiting volunteers. Additionally, a combination study of CX-4945 with ATM inhibitors (Sunitinib, Pazopanib, and Temsirolimus) in kidney cancer (NCT03571438) which aims to evaluate the therapeutic potential of the compounds in clinical treatment is currently ongoing. A recently completed phase I/II clinical trial (NCT02128282) estimated the safety and tolerability of increasing doses of CX-4945 in combination with gemcitabine plus cisplatin to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the recommended Phase II dose (RP2D) in the frontline treatment of patients with cholangiocarcinoma. 200 mg CX-4945 combined with 25 mg/m.sq. cisplatin or 1,000 mg/m.sq. gemcitabine was adopted in MTD and RP2D estimation. Unfortunately, the results are presently unavailable to the public. Additional experiments and clinical trials are currently scheduled to assess the therapeutic potential of CX-4945 in cancer treatment.
CC-671 is a dual inhibitor of CLK2 and Monopolar spindle 1 (Mps1, also named TTK).[146] Seven kinases showed over 80% inhibition by CC-671 across a 255 kinases panel. TTK and CLK2 activities were potently suppressed of the seven identified kinases with IC50 values of 5 nM and 6 nM, respectively.[146] Other kinases, such as CLK1 or DYRKs, were also inhibited by CC-671 with different IC50 values.[146] Interestingly, results from a series of ActivX KiNative™ profiling assays indicated that CLK2 was inhibited in vitro by CC-671 with an IC50 of 15 nM; however, TTK was not inhibited.[146] Furthermore, treatment of different breast cancer cell lines with CC-671 showed that luminal BC cells were more sensitive to CC-671 treatment versus TNBC cells.[146]
Thiophene 48 is a dual DYRK/CLK1 inhibitor that was synthesized based on the natural molecule harmine.[147] Thiophene 48 showed potent activity with IC50 values of 110 nM, 100 nM, 70 nM, and 40 nM on CLK1, DYRK1A, DYRK1B, and DYRK2, respectively. Moreover, the compound was found to have a 75-fold, 3-fold, and 2-fold better inhibitory activity against DYRK2, DYRK1B, and CLK1 compared to the reference compound harmine.[147] 1 μM Thiophene 48 significantly induced cell apoptosis in U2OS osteosarcoma cells by increasing the ratio of caspase 3/7. However, Thiophene 48 showed no cytotoxicity at 5 μM on V79 hamster lung fibroblasts while the same concentration of Harmine significantly inhibited cell growth.[147]
Leucettine L41 is a dual inhibitor of CLK1/4 and DYRKs. Leucettine L41 was modified by using Leucettamine B as an inhibitory scaffold, and was shown to co-crystallized with DYRK1A, DYRK2, CLK3, PIM1, and GSK-3β.[148],[149] Leucettine L41 exhibited potent inhibition on DYRK1A, DYRK1B, and DYRK2 with IC50 values of 60, 44, and 73 nM, respectively. However, the IC50 values with respect to CLKs are much higher.[148] Compared to the effect of leucettamine B, the inhibitory activities of L41 were significantly increased against DYRKs, CLK1, and CLK4; however, the IC50 with respect to CLK3 was obvious increased from 1.8 nM to more than 10 μM, suggesting that CLK1/4 may also be ideal targets of L41.[148] The study further indicated that L41 displayed a neuroprotective role in glutamate-induced HT22 cell death.[148] Moreover, Leucettine L41 decreased the phosphorylation of SRp75 in HMEC-1 cells. In addition, a CLK1 minigene transgenic model in Hela cells indicated that L41 treatment significantly elevated the percentage of exon inclusion of CLK1 itself.[150]
More compounds have been shown to inhibit CLKs activities and/or other CMGC kinases; however, detailed molecular mechanisms and in vivo experimental evidence are currently sparce. For example: Compound 3A5,[151] ML315,[152] SRI-29329,[153] ML167,[154] ML106,[155] and BM07114[156] still lack the pre-clinical data to support their anti-diseases efficiency. The constant efforts that uncover the underlying potential of CLKs inhibitors to prevent various diseases will pave the path to drug development and facilitate the progress of diseases treatment.
Conclusions and future perspectives
Protein kinases, which phosphorylate specific substrate moieties, play critical roles in cell growth and differentiation. Substrate phosphorylation by kinases controls diverse cellular processes.[157] Abnormal expression or dysfunction of protein kinases lead to many human diseases, including cancer. Many protein kinases are closely related to human diseases, for example, AURKA,[158] AKT,[159] CDK12,[160] CDK15,[161] LIMK,[162] CLKs,[163] AMPK,[164] and p38 MAPK.[165]
CLKs participate in the phosphorylation of key proteins that regulate cellular metabolism and various signaling pathways.[133],[166] Irregular expression of CLKs and the dysregulation of alternative splicing have been identified in several human diseases; therefore, CLKs have emerged as a new class of disease hallmarks.[167]–[169] Accumulating evidence has revealed the importance of CLKs in various physiological processes such as Duchenne muscular dystrophy, Alzheimer’s disease, and cancer. However, there are still limitations in the current understanding of CLKs. Firstly, the relationship between CLKs, immunotherapy, and the tumor microenvironment is currently unknown. Next, animal disease models, including CLKs conditional knockout or in situ disease models, are needed to fully understand the importance of CLKs in disease occurrence and development. Given the recent discovery showing that oxidation of the Met307 residue of CLK4 disrupted its kinase activity,[126] more studies should be carried out to explore posttranslational modifications able to regulate CLKs function and expression. Moreover, the Q607R mutation within the CLK3 kinase domain enhanced c-Myc activity in promoting CCA,[124] indicating the importance of CLKs somatic mutations in human diseases. Therefore, a mutation map of different CLKs detailing the functional consequences of specific mutations will contribute to explore the underlying molecular mechanism of CLKs. Therefore, continued investigation of CLKs functionality using high throughput sequencing and animal models are required to foster a more complete understanding of CLKs in human diseases occurrence and progression.
Due to the essential role of CLKs in human diseases, significant efforts have been made to study CLKs inhibitors using kinase screening technologies and pharmacological approaches. Most inhibitors have been well studied and have shown satisfactory anti-neurodegeneration, anti-inflammation, anti-viral, and anti-cancer effects by inhibiting the expression and activities of CLKs. However, there are still challenges associated with current CLKs inhibitors, and efforts can be made to achieve the following goals for disease therapeutics: 1) Targeted inhibition of specific CLKs for precision therapy. Most small molecular CLKs targeting drugs are broad-spectrum inhibitors, thus, specific inhibitors able to target CLK1, -2, -3, or -4 are needed to achieve greater therapeutic effect to reach a more precision therapy. 2) Development of pan-CLKs inhibitors to achieve heightened anti-cancer effects. The dysfunction and irregular expression of different CLKs members are concomitant in various human diseases, thus, the improvement of pan-CLKs inhibitors can help to maximize the treatment efficacy and benefit more patients in the clinic. 3) Enhance the specificity and selectivity of inhibitors to CLKs compared with other homologous CMGC family proteins through structural optimization. Many CLKs inhibitors show slight or strong off-target effects on other homologous kinases, such as, DYRKs and SRPKs. 4) Combination therapies of CLKs inhibitors with other compounds to achieve synergistic effects in the treatment of various diseases. Aiko et al. noted that treatment with CLK-IN-T3 in combination with the Bcl-xL/Bcl-2 inhibitor ABT-263 synergistically induced caspase 3/7-dependent apoptosis in A2780 and HCT116 cells compared to CLK-IN-T3 treatment alone.[132] Meanwhile, E7107, an SF3b-targeting splicing modulator, synergistically enhanced apoptosis in NSCLC cell lines when combined with ABT-263.[170] These findings indicate that the combination strategy of targeting CLKs with other inhibitors is an appropriate splicing molecular-based approach for future clinical development. It is noteworthy that certain CLKs inhibitors were recognized as ideal lead compounds for structural optimization to obtain more specific CLKs inhibitors. Moreover, a genetic function algorithm support vector regression (GFA-SVR)[171] and ligand- or structure-based drug optimization[172],[173] provided predictive models and effective methods for screening and optimizing of the potential of CLKs inhibitors. Nonetheless, research on CLKs-based therapy is still in the initial stage; the cognition and development of CLKs inhibitors will undoubtedly progress upon more in-depth investigation.
In conclusion, CLKs facilitate biological processes through the phosphorylation or modulation of their downstream targets in a splicing or non-splicing-dependent manner. Changes in CLKs activity or expression level are closely related to pathological processes. CLKs inhibitors have shown significant therapeutic effects in various human diseases including neurodegenerative diseases, inflammatory diseases, viral replication, and cancer. To our knowledge, most of the compounds discussed in this review satisfy the criteria for chemical biology probes and have excellent prospects for the development of novel medicines. Given the essential role of CLKs in various human diseases, it can be expected that targeting CLK kinases may prove clinically beneficial in the future.
Acknowledgements
AcknowledgementsThis work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 82002620, No. 81972839, NO. 8207112153) and the Science and Technology Project of Henan Province (No. 212102310698, NO. 222102310102).