← 专区目录
目录 · 跳到任一小节
脑科学 · 王君敏专区 · 论文精读 03/06 · 综述精译(转化分支)

常压高氧:一个便宜到没人愿意做的卒中干预,到底有多少证据

Li C, Jiang M, Chen Z, Hu Q, Liu Z, Wang J, Yin X, Wang J, Wu M(王君敏为第六作者)· CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics 2024;30(7):e14858 | DOI 10.1111/cns.14858
英文原题 The neuroprotective effects of normobaric oxygen therapy after stroke
下划线 = 中文容易“变味”或丢信息的词句:红线带编号 = 14 条注释卡(悬停看、点击跳转)。这篇讲的不是新药,是面罩吸氧:40% 到 100% 的氧、常压下、吸几小时。它便宜、无创、救护车上就能开始,却二十年来一直没定论。读它最该带走的不是“NBO 有效”,而是“一项干预的证据长什么样,才算够”。

摘要(全译)

卒中,包括缺血性卒中和出血性卒中,是一种严重且常见的急性脑血管病。卒中之后出现的缺氧,可以触发一连串病理事件,包括线粒体功能障碍、能量缺乏、氧化应激、神经炎症和兴奋性毒性,而这些通常都与不良预后相关。尽管如此,一种被称为常压高氧(NBO)的无创干预,已知对卒中具有神经保护作用。

NBO 可以通过多种机制发挥神经保护作用:挽救缺氧组织、保护血脑屏障、减轻脑水肿、缓解神经炎症、改善线粒体功能、减轻氧化应激、降低兴奋性毒性,以及抑制凋亡。这些机制可能有助于改善卒中患者的预后。

本综述总结了缺氧造成脑损伤的机制,以及 NBO 如何作为一种神经保护治疗来对付卒中。我们的结论是:NBO 在治疗卒中方面有可观的潜力,可能代表一种新的治疗策略。

关键词:脑缺氧;神经保护;常压高氧;氧疗;卒中

引言(精译)

卒中包括缺血性与出血性两类,是脑供血不足或脑实质内血管破裂引起的常见脑血管病。它是全球仅次于心血管病的第二大死因,每年影响超过 1500 万人。卒中的一个标志性事件是脑血流(CBF)中断,使脑组织失去氧和葡萄糖,导致 ATP 合成中断、离子稳态与酸碱平衡受损。这些功能障碍最终造成脑水肿、神经炎症和神经元死亡,并留下严重的神经功能缺损。

氧是细胞稳态与存活不可缺少的底物:它是线粒体呼吸链的最终电子受体,磷酸化氧化靠它来合成 ATP。脑组织只占体重的 2%,却消耗超过 20% 的总氧,用来产生维持膜电位所需的 ATP。作为最大的耗能器官,脑的毛细血管密度低,是对缺氧最敏感的器官,依赖持续不断的氧供。成人动脉血氧分压(PaO2)的正常范围是11.0–14.4 kPa,动脉血氧饱和度(SaO2)的正常范围是 95%–98%。缺氧指的是机体或某个区域在组织层面得不到足够的氧。缺氧是急性卒中后的常见特征,与神经功能缺损和死亡率升高相关;它直接导致神经元死亡,还可能损害脑功能。此外,越来越多证据表明,缺氧会影响卒中的许多病理侧面——神经炎症、氧化应激、线粒体损伤、突触功能障碍——它们共同构成卒中后的继发性脑损伤(SBI)。

所以氧疗可能延缓或减轻卒中的进展。氧疗指通过提高吸入气中的 PaO2 与血中的 SaO2 来缓解缺氧的医疗手段,广泛用于中枢神经系统疾病的治疗。标准的氧疗包括高压氧(HBO)与常压高氧(NBO)。HBO 在高压下(2.5 atm,相当于 253 kPa)给氧,以提高组织中的 PaO2;NBO 则是在常压下给予 40%–100% 的高流量氧,以补充氧供、提高动脉血氧含量。

关键段一 · 卒中之后到底缺不缺氧:一组互相打架的证据

先看缺血性卒中这边。Read 等人用 18F-FMISO PET 检测缺血性卒中患者的梗死周围组织缺氧:13 例患者里有 9 例在发病 48 小时内检出缺氧。另有研究用近红外光谱(NIRS)监测急性缺血性卒中患者静脉推注吲哚菁绿的动力学:与未受累半球相比,梗死半球推注峰值时间、峰值时间与上升时间都延长,斜率和血流指数下降。Lu 等人用定量磁敏感加权成像,更准确地判断了 AIS 患者的低灌注与半暗带缺氧。血清里 HIF-1α(细胞缺氧应答的主转录调控因子)在卒中患者中显著高于健康人,且与临床结局正相关。在 MCAO 模型大鼠里,MRI 与 pimonidazole 染色都看到了缺氧组织;颈动脉闭塞大鼠则用组织集成氧传感器连续监测到组织氧下降。

出血性卒中这边同样有一堆证据。脑组织氧监测显示,大多数脑出血(ICH)患者的脑组织供氧不足:用神经监测探头测 ICH 患者的脑组织氧分压,出血侧显著低于健康组织。近期研究报道 ICH 患者血清 HIF-1α 明显高于健康对照,且与出血严重程度和 90 天结局密切相关。18F-FMISO PET/MRI 显示,胶原酶 VII 诱导的 ICH 模型大鼠血肿周围区域存在预期的缺氧,且 ICH 后 18–24 小时 18F-FMISO 摄取显著升高。在猪 ICH 模型里,随着血肿形成,颅内压升高与继发性血肿体积增加进一步加重了脑组织缺氧。

但接下来这一句必须单独拿出来:用 18F-FMISO PET 图像,Hirano 等人显示 ICH 患者并未表现出组织缺氧。

怎么读这个矛盾:同一类病人、同一项技术、相反结论。原文没有解释原因,我这里只给两种可能,你自己判断——一是 ICH 的缺氧可能是局部的、时间窗极短的,PET 的空间与时间平均会把它抹平;二是 FMISO 在出血脑组织里的摄取本身可能受血肿干扰。这不是原文的结论,是我的推测。但它提醒你一件事:读“缺氧存在”这类结论时,先问用什么方法测的、测的是哪块组织、什么时候测的。

关键段二 · 缺氧之后坏在哪:四条通路

第一条是能量。卒中后伤处血流显著下降,氧供受限,神经元首当其冲。缺氧时线粒体氧化磷酸化被抑制,活性氧(ROS)堆积、ATP 合成减少。在 MCAO 模型大鼠的半暗带,ATP 浓度与总腺嘌呤核苷酸含量显著下降,糖原几乎耗竭;缺氧组织里 ATP 水解产生的 ADP 进一步代谢为 AMP,再转化为次黄嘌呤与肌苷,腺嘌呤核苷酸整体耗竭。这一条解释了为什么“补氧”在理论上说得通:缺的就是末端电子受体。

第二条是线粒体与氧化应激。ATP 合成受阻后,线粒体的形态与功能都明显改变:钙内流导致线粒体通透性转换孔(MPTP)开放、细胞色素 c 释放;ATP 不足又触发线粒体膜去极化,表现为钠内流、钾外流。ROS 与抗氧化防御的平衡被打乱,而 ROS 与线粒体代谢又深度耦合,于是线粒体损伤与氧化应激互为因果。这里原文还并列提到了铁死亡与铜死亡:铁死亡以细胞内铁蓄积和铁依赖的脂质过氧化为特征;铜死亡则是新近定义的一种死亡方式,以线粒体内游离铜蓄积和蛋白脂酰化为特征,依赖线粒体呼吸与三羧酸循环。

两篇文章对不上的一个细节:这篇说铁死亡时细胞形态的特点是“线粒体体积减小、凝聚的线粒体膜密度降低”;而本站 01 页那篇 2021 年 Cells 综述写的是“线粒体膜密度增高”。两篇出自同一个课题组、同一年前后发表,对同一个形态学特征的描述相反。较通行的说法是膜密度增高——这提醒你:综述里的形态学描述会抄错,遇到关键判据一定要回到原始电镜文献。

第三条是神经炎症。脑缺氧会损伤脑微血管系统与血脑屏障:紧密连接蛋白(TJP)丢失、旁细胞通透性升高、细胞毒性水肿、免疫细胞浸润,从而触发炎症反应。缺氧还激活炎症转录因子,诱导炎症介质、细胞因子与酶的合成释放;活化的小胶质细胞和星形胶质细胞释放 TNF-α、IL-1α、IFN-γ、ROS、一氧化氮(NO)和基质金属蛋白酶 9(MMP-9)等,进一步加重炎症与脑损伤。此外,缺氧可通过调节 HIF-1α 诱导小胶质细胞表达促炎介质(NO 与 TNF-α)。

第四条是兴奋性毒性。正常情况下谷氨酸的再摄取是耗能过程;缺氧时离子转运、神经递质再摄取这些 ATP 依赖的生理活动立刻下降,神经元释放谷氨酸、细胞外谷氨酸堆积,过度刺激 NMDAR 与 AMPAR,大量钙内流,神经元去极化;去极化又打开电压门控钙通道与钠通道,钙钠进一步内流。钙超载扰乱离子稳态,使线粒体与胞质同时钙过载;离子失衡还使水内流,造成水肿与细胞组织溶解。这一串事件刺激各类蛋白酶、脂酶、激酶、磷酸酶、核酸内切酶与自由基,最终通过 calpain 激活、氧化应激、线粒体损伤等途径导致神经元死亡。

分子层面还有一条值得记住的链:NMDAR 被钙内流激活后,PTEN 被募集到 GluN2B-NMDAR 上,PTEN 信号可能诱导神经元死亡;而去磷酸化的死亡相关蛋白激酶(DAPK)作为钙/钙调蛋白依赖的丝氨酸/苏氨酸激酶,参与凋亡。卒中后 NMDAR 过度激活促进钙内流与钙调磷酸酶(calcineurin)活化,使 DAPK 去磷酸化并被激活。有趣的是,选择性 NMDAR 拮抗剂 MK-801 与钙调磷酸酶抑制剂 FK506 都能阻止缺血后 DAPK 的去磷酸化,从而发挥神经保护作用——这也是作者提出 DAPK 可作为 AIS 潜在治疗靶点的依据。

关键段三 · NBO 凭什么起效:证据里最硬的那几个数字

最直接的一条是“把氧送进半暗带”。AIS 后组织氧合的变化高度不均:核心区严重低灌注,半暗带血流中度下降。Liu 等人用电子顺磁共振测局部组织间质氧分压:在大鼠脑缺血模型里,核心区间质氧分压迅速降到约 4%,半暗带降到缺血前的 30%。他们进一步证明,给 95% 的 NBO 能让半暗带的间质氧分压维持在接近缺血前水平,再灌注时氧分压翻倍。在远端 MCAO 大鼠模型里,100% 氧使氧合血红蛋白浓度立即并持续升高,1 小时内核心区几乎翻倍,同时保住了核心区与半暗带的脑血流、抑制了梗死周边扩大与去极化。

第二条是代谢。缺氧时脑内葡萄糖代谢转向无氧糖酵解,ATP 产量骤降;NBO 已被证明能降低边缘区组织的 ATP 消耗、减轻局灶性脑缺血的酸中毒。在卒中患者身上,用多体素磁共振波谱成像可以看到:面罩吸入 45 L/min 氧气、持续 8 小时期间,作为有氧代谢标志物的乳酸下降。这意味着 NBO 不只是“送氧”,它还在把代谢往有氧方向推。

第三条是 BBB 与水肿,这一块的证据最杂,也最能看出“剂量”的重要性。Fujiwara 等人在胶原酶 VII 诱导的大鼠 ICH 模型里给 100% NBO 两小时,第 3 天并没有加重出血严重程度、脑水肿或神经功能结局;Gaberel 等人在小鼠 ICH 模型里给 30 分钟 NBO,纵向 T2* 加权图像上血肿的表观体积快速而持续地缩小;另一项研究在大鼠 ICH 模型里给 90% 氧、每天 6 小时、连续 3 天,改善了神经严重程度评分、减轻脑水肿与细胞凋亡、抑制血肿周围的 HIF-1α 与 VEGF。自体血或胶原酶诱导的小鼠 ICH 模型里,30 分钟内启动 1 小时的 NBO 或 3 个大气压的 HBO 都能减轻脑水肿与 BBB 破坏,并减轻出血后 occludin 降解、MMP-9 激活与 HIF-1α 表达。NBO 还能挽救 ICH 后小胶质细胞介导的突触修剪,恢复突触后蛋白(PSD 与 NR2B)表达、改善突触棘丢失。

缺血侧的证据同样指向“越早越好、浓度有讲究”。Liang 等人报告 100% NBO 30 分钟可减缓 BBB 损伤(伊文思蓝漏出、水肿与出血体积在 3、5、7 小时均下降),而且这种保护在给 t-PA 期间仍然存在——作者据此提出,NBO 可能是延长 t-PA 溶栓时间窗的有效辅助手段。机制上,NBO 通过降低 MMP-9 表达、减少 TJP 丢失、抑制 occludin 与 claudin-5 降解来保护 BBB。95% NBO 抑制 NADPH 氧化酶活性与 MMP-9 诱导;60% 与 100% NBO 在再灌注期都能改善神经功能缺损评分、减轻脑水肿、中性粒细胞浸润与梗死体积,而 100% 效果更好。减轻脑水肿的分子机制可能涉及降低 AQP4 与 Na+/H+ 交换体 1、升高 HIF-1α;40% 氧也能在早期改善缺血区血流灌注、减轻 BBB 通透性与脑水肿。

反过来,也有做不出来的。Elmira Pasban 报告:在 MCAO 90 分钟、再灌注 24 小时的大鼠里,早期给 90 分钟 NBO 既没有减轻缺血性脑损伤,也没有改善血管源性脑水肿或 BBB 破坏。作者的措辞很克制——总体而言 NBO 能减轻脑水肿与 BBB 通透性,但并非每个方案都成立。

其余几条机制可以压缩成一句话一个:抗炎(Esposito 等人报告 NBO 的保护作用可持续 2 周,机制是抑制小胶质细胞与星形胶质细胞反应;HBO 预处理还能下调 JNK/STAT 通路、减弱 M1 极化、降低促炎因子与 MMP-9);护线粒体与抗氧化(2 小时 MCAO 加 1 小时再灌注期间给 NBO,通过 HO-1 与蛋白羰基化减轻梗死而不增加氧化应激;维持 GPX4 与 NADPH 氧化酶 4 的稳态、挽回连接蛋白 43 的下调;减少细胞色素 c 释放,而抑制 GPX4 或连接蛋白 43 通路可以取消这一效应;降低锌蓄积、稳定线粒体膜电位);降钙超载(长期或间断 NBO 预处理可诱导脑缺血耐受,上调 EAAT1–3 与 mGluR I/II,增加 NCX1/2/3 的表达;Haelewyn 等人证明 NBO 能减轻 NMDA 诱导的神经元变性、降低培养神经元的 NMDA 诱导钙内流);抗凋亡(NBO 联合米诺环素更有效地抑制 MMP-2/9、occludin 降解、caspase-3/9 活化与 AIF 表达;NBO 联合乙醇减少促凋亡蛋白、增加 Bcl-2 与 Bcl-xL,把凋亡细胞比例降低 49%;缺血后给 NBO 2、4、8 小时,8 小时效果最好)。

但请把 Haelewyn 的另一半结论也记住:同一个人报告,NBO 在大鼠 MCAO 模型与 OGD 神经元模型里加重了缺血性损伤。一篇综述里同时出现“保护”和“加重”,这不是作者不严谨,这就是这个领域的现状。

关键段四 · 临床证据:一张表,九项研究,一半是“非随机”

原文给了一句很形象的话:NBO 可能把半暗带“冻住”、延长再灌注治疗的时间窗,因此是血管内取栓的理想辅助手段。下面是原文 Table 1 的中译。

受试人群例数方案与时长结局
MRI 上灌注-弥散“不匹配”的急性卒中患者16100% 氧,45 L/min,8 小时,简易面罩DWI 病灶体积与 NIHSS 评分下降
首次发作的大面积大脑中动脉梗死患者4640% 氧,2 L/min,平均 132.9 小时(48.0–168.5),Venturi 面罩死亡率与并发症减少
MRI 上灌注-弥散“不匹配”的急性卒中患者6100% 氧,45 L/min,8 小时,简易面罩脑内 N-乙酰天冬氨酸保留,乳酸下降
ICA 和/或近端 MCA 闭塞、就诊时存在弥散/灌注不匹配的患者14100% 氧,45 L/min,8 小时,简易面罩在溶栓治疗时间窗之外,获得了 4 小时以上的稳定不匹配
MRI 上灌注-弥散“不匹配”的急性卒中患者19100% 氧,45 L/min,8 小时,简易面罩缺血病灶的增长被减缓
急性缺血性卒中患者231100% 氧,10 L/min,4 小时,简易面罩,联合血管内治疗梗死体积减小;症状性颅内出血、死亡率与不良事件减少
前循环卒中患者17550% FiO2,15 L/min,6 小时,Venturi 面罩,联合机械取栓梗死体积减小,90 天死亡率下降
后循环卒中患者8750% FiO2,15 L/min,6 小时,Venturi 面罩,联合机械取栓梗死体积减小,90 天死亡率下降
急性缺血性卒中患者40100% 氧,10 L/min,12 小时,简易面罩临床评分(NIHSS、mRS、BI)无差异

表格之外,正文补了几处细节:早期临床试验显示 NBO 安全、可行,AIS 患者在 4 小时时出现临床缺损与 MRI 病灶体积的一过性改善,NBO 组 4 小时与 24 小时的平均相对脑血容量(CBV)与 CBF 显著升高;用 Venturi 面罩吸 40% 氧治疗重度 AIS,死亡率与合并症低于鼻导管吸氧;用 LCModel 软件分析波谱,NBO 保留了脑内 N-乙酰天冬氨酸、降低了乳酸,提示改善了缺血脑的有氧代谢、保住了神经元完整性;4 小时 NBO 能减缓缺血病灶增长;针对急性 ICH 患者的 NBO 随机对照试验方案正在探索中。

然后是两个必须学会读的句子。Li 等人报告,与单纯血管内治疗(EVT)相比,NBO + EVT 能显著减小梗死体积、改善预后、降低症状性颅内出血、死亡率与不良事件的发生率,但这些效应无统计学意义。Cheng 等人在前循环取栓后加高流量 NBO,梗死体积与 90 天死亡率显著下降;把同样的方案用在后循环患者身上,梗死体积与 90 天死亡率也下降,但差异无统计学意义。而 Padma 等人在印度 AIS 患者中做 NBO,NIHSS、mRS、BI 一系列临床评分都没有改善。

“无统计学意义”不等于“无效”,也不等于“有效”。它只说明这批数据还不足以排除偶然。看到这种句子,你要看的是:效应方向是否一致(这几项都是“下降”“改善”),样本量是否够(十几例到几百例),有没有预设的主要终点。方向一致而样本不足,通常意味着“需要更大的试验”;方向不一致,才是“这个干预可能没用”。

关键段五 · 代价与反证:便宜不等于没代价

NBO 不只保护脑,也可能带来不良反应:氧中毒、脑血管收缩、神经兴奋性毒性,以及肺损伤。Quintard 等人发现,NBO 治疗会升高重型颅脑损伤患者脑内的谷氨酸含量,造成脑兴奋性毒性、加重继发性损伤。高浓度供氧还可能引起脑血管收缩,导致脑低灌注,从而升高颅内压、扩大脑血肿与水肿、恶化神经功能。高浓度氧很容易造成氧中毒:ROS 的形成是氧中毒的生化基础,也是继发性损伤的原因之一;当过高浓度的氧在脑组织中蓄积,神经元内 ROS 水平进一步升高,影响线粒体信号通路、激活细胞色素 c 释放,导致细胞死亡、加速组织损伤。ROS 还会造成脂质过氧化、蛋白氧化与 DNA 损伤。但 ROS 也能提高细胞内抗氧化酶的活性或表达,用来清除过量的 ROS。所以“NBO 是否导致 ROS 升高并损伤神经元”仍有争议;目前治疗 AIS 的主流看法是,NBO 的获益显著大于 ROS 的潜在风险。

此外,氧中毒可能加重肺损伤,引起肺动脉高压与肺纤维化:高浓度氧进入肺后取代肺泡内的氮气、迅速弥散进血浆,导致肺泡塌陷、肺泡通气下降。

为了减少不良反应,作者给出了相当具体的操作建议,这部分其实是全文最“能上手”的内容:控制氧浓度与吸氧时间,做脑组织氧监测或脑微透析;对 AIS 患者,把 NBO(100% 氧,10 L/min)控制在 4–6 小时可能提高疗效。脑微透析可以持续动态监测脑内与氧疗密切相关的物质,如葡萄糖、乳酸、ROS 相关物质、神经递质与脑损伤标志物。吸氧前先把溶液加温湿化,定期雾化吸入以减轻刺激;鼓励患者深呼吸、多咳嗽、勤翻身,防止分泌物堵住呼吸道。

结论部分,作者的态度是清醒的:氧对维持生命不可或缺,卒中造成脑供血供氧不足、触发一系列病理损伤;氧疗能有效延缓病理事件、防止脑的进一步损伤;NBO 简单、无创、优势明显,可用于卒中的早期治疗。但争议与挑战仍然存在:哪些患者适合氧疗?氧疗的最佳时间是什么时候?浓度、时间与方式怎么定?这些问题都还需要进一步探索。

一个关于学术生态的事实(原文利益声明里写的):本刊 CNSNT 的编委之一王建是本文的共同作者,为避嫌,他被排除在本文的编辑决策之外。你以后会在很多期刊的作者贡献与利益声明里看到类似的句子——它不是套话,是同行评议能不能被信任的凭证。

这篇在轨迹里的位置

先摆事实:这篇 2024 年 CNSNT 的 NBO 综述,王君敏排第六(九位作者),前面是李川、姜敏、陈志英、胡琼琼、刘紫英,后面是殷小平、王建、吴模新。作者贡献里写明:综述的初始构想来自吴模新、王建、殷小平与李川,图由陈志英、胡琼琼、刘紫英与王君敏准备,王建与姜敏修改稿件。基金里有国家自然科学基金 82260209、81960221、82371339,江西省自然科学基金、江西省教育厅与江西省卫健委的项目,以及河南省青年基金 242300421515。所以这是一篇跨省合作的综述:郑州的组与江西的组一起写。

把它放进时间线里看就更清楚了。2021 年那篇 Cells 综述(本站 01 页)是“形态学阶段”的收口:伤后细胞长什么样。2024 年 CNSNT 的 S100A9(本站 02 页)是“细胞因子链”的代表作:哪群细胞、哪条通路。同年的 BBB 综述(十七人里第十三)是“结构”的补充。而这一篇 NBO 综述,走的是另一条线:转化。它不谈一个新靶点,它谈一个已经在用、便宜、能立刻上临床的干预,然后把证据摊开给你看——有多少是阳性的、有多少是阴性的、剂量和时窗怎么定。

这两条线在同一个课题组里并存,其实很说明问题。一个组如果只做机制,很容易被问“so what”;如果只做临床观察,又解释不了为什么。NBO 这类题目恰好卡在中间:机制相对清楚(送氧、护 BBB、降水肿),临床证据却是混合的。写这种综述,比写“某某通路在某某疾病中起重要作用”要难,因为你必须诚实地把阴性结果也写进去——本文确实写了 Haelewyn 的加重损伤、Pasban 的无效、Padma 的无差异。

往后看,2025 年 CNSNT 的鼻内 rIL-10(二十人里第二)和 Clin Transl Med 的单核转录组(通讯作者,本站 04 页)接着走;2026 年 J Neuroinflammation 的 BTLA 与 J Extracell Vesicles 的 C1qc 已经是通讯作者。路线从“读别人的证据”到“自己的证据”,再到“设计证据”,这篇 NBO 正好站在中间那一格:它教你一个干预的完整证据链应该长什么样,以后你自己设计课题时,会不自觉地按这个格式去凑。

给刚进组的你

把上面那张表抄一遍。别复制粘贴,手抄:受试人群、例数、方案、结局,四列。抄完你会发现两件事:阳性结果的样本量大多很小(6 例、14 例、16 例、19 例),而样本量大的那几项(231 例、175 例、87 例)是联合取栓的研究,NBO 只是配角。这就是证据强度的真实分布。

第二件事,学会看剂量。同样是“NBO”,这篇里出现了 40%、50%、60%、90%、95%、100% 氧,2、4、6、8、12 小时,2、10、15、45 L/min,以及简易面罩和 Venturi 面罩两种给氧方式。你以后写方法,这五个参数(浓度、流量、时长、装置、启动时间)缺一个,别人就没法复现;你以后读别人的“NBO 有效”,先找这五个。

第三件事,如果你要做细胞实验,注意“复氧”这个变量。细胞孵箱里用的是空气,而脑组织在体内的实际氧分压远低于空气;所谓 OGD/R 里的“R”,到底复到多少氧,会直接改变你观察到的 ROS 和凋亡。下次做 OGD 前问一句师姐:我们的复氧是常规孵箱,还是低氧工作站?这一句能帮你避开一个很常见的坑。

最后一个动作,读完这篇之后,去把它的结论句抄在笔记本上:“NBO 简单、无创、优势明显……但争议与挑战仍然存在:哪些患者适合?最佳时间是什么时候?浓度、时间与方式怎么定?” 这三个问号,就是这一整片领域还没做完的作业。你哪天想找一个“投入小、问题清楚、能马上做”的课题,这类问号比“某通路在卒中中的作用”更值得看一眼。


▲ 本部分翻译难点(对照学习用)

〔注1〕
原文
normobaric hyperoxia (NBO)
直译
常压高氧
失味点
中文“常压高氧”容易被读成“氧气压力很高”。它其实是两个词的组合:normobaric 指“一个大气压的常压环境”(区别于高压舱),hyperoxia 指“吸入氧浓度高于空气的 21%”。所以它不是把氧压进身体,而是在正常气压下把吸入气的氧比例调高。译成“常压氧疗”会让你以为重点在“疗”,其实重点是“常压”这个前提。
学习提示
三个词分清楚:normobaric(常压)、hyperbaric(高压)、hyperoxia(高氧浓度)。前两个说的是压力环境,第三个说的是氧分压/浓度。中文常把 hyperoxia 也译成“高压氧”,这就是混淆的源头。
〔注2〕
原文
hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) therapy(2.5 atm,相当于 253 kPa)
直译
高压氧治疗
失味点
中文“高压氧”听上去像“氧气的压力很大”,而 HBO 的关键不是氧压,是环境压力:人被放进 2.5 个大气压的舱里吸纯氧,靠的是环境压力把更多氧溶进血浆。译名里丢掉“舱”和“环境压力”,你就理解不了它为什么需要专门的设备和监护。
学习提示
记住换算:1 atm ≈ 101.3 kPa,2.5 atm ≈ 253 kPa。看到 atm 先换算成 kPa,再看这是“舱压”还是“氧分压”,两者不是一回事。
〔注3〕
原文
penumbra
直译
半暗带
失味点
“半暗带”是拉丁语 penumbra(半影,日食时那圈半明半暗的区域)的直译,中文读者第一次见会以为是“一半亮一半暗的带子”。它在卒中里的准确含义是:血流下降但还没死的脑组织,是“能救回来的那部分”。译成“边缘区”或“缺血周边区”会丢掉“可挽救”这层意思,而这层意思恰恰是整个 NBO 逻辑的支点。
学习提示
和 penumbra 一起记的两个词:core(核心区,已梗死、救不回来)、mismatch(灌注-弥散不匹配,影像上识别半暗带的方法)。本文的好几项临床试验入组标准就是 mismatch。
〔注4〕
原文
NBO may freeze the penumbra and extend the time window for reperfusion
直译
NBO 可能把半暗带“冻住”,并延长再灌注的时间窗
失味点
freeze 是修辞,不是真的降温。直译“冻住”,中文读者会想到低温治疗(本文另一处确实提到 hypothermia,两者容易混)。作者的意思是“让半暗带停止恶化、把时间买下来”——就像把画面定格,等取栓的医生来。
学习提示
医学英文里的动词常常是比喻:freeze、rescue、bridge、buy time。读的时候把它还原成“实际发生了什么”,写中文时再用解释代替直译。这一句可以译成“为半暗带争取时间”。
〔注5〕
原文
PaO2 11.0–14.4 kPa;SaO2 95%–98%
直译
动脉血氧分压 11.0–14.4 千帕;动脉血氧饱和度 95%–98%
失味点
中文临床习惯用 mmHg(正常约 80–100 mmHg),而这篇用 kPa。1 kPa ≈ 7.5 mmHg,所以 11.0–14.4 kPa 大约相当于 82–108 mmHg。不换算的话,你会觉得这个数值很陌生,也判断不出“缺氧”到什么程度才算低。另外 PaO2 与 SaO2 一个是分压、一个是饱和度,中文都带“氧”,极易混。
学习提示
记两个锚点:PaO2 正常下限约 60 mmHg(≈8 kPa)时,氧解离曲线开始陡降;SaO2 低于 90% 就是低氧血症的常用界值。以后看到 kPa 的数据,先在脑子里乘 7.5。
〔注6〕
原文
oxygen toxicity
直译
氧中毒
失味点
“氧中毒”四个字容易被理解成“氧气本身有毒”。氧气当然不是毒物,问题是浓度和时长:过高的氧分压会让线粒体电子传递链“漏电子”增多、ROS 生成加快,超过抗氧化系统的清除能力。所以这是一个剂量问题,不是一个毒性问题。
学习提示
和它配套的三个词:ROS、脂质过氧化、抗氧化酶。看任何“高氧有害”的实验,先查浓度(FiO2)、时长、以及有没有测 ROS 或抗氧化酶活性——只说“高氧有害”而不给这三个参数的,基本没法判断。
〔注7〕
原文
cerebral vasoconstriction
直译
脑血管收缩
失味点
直译没错,但中文读者很难立刻看出它为什么是“坏消息”。逻辑是这样的:高氧 → 脑血管收缩 → 局部血流下降 → 本来缺血的地方更缺血;同时收缩让静脉回流减少、颅内压可能升高。也就是说,同一个干预在不同血管上可能方向相反——这就是“高氧的矛盾”。
学习提示
这类“同一个干预既保护又伤害”的机制,是写讨论时最值钱的材料。以后再遇到高氧、低温、缺血预处理,都问一句:有没有可能把获益抵消掉的那条通路?
〔注8〕
原文
time window(本文里指两个不同的窗)
直译
时间窗
失味点
中文一律译“时间窗”,于是文章里两个完全不同的窗被读成一个:一个是溶栓/取栓的治疗窗(病人能在发病后几小时内到达并接受再通),一个是NBO 自身的治疗窗(吸氧从什么时候开始、吸多久)。本文的核心主张之一,恰恰是“NBO 可以延长前一个窗”。两个窗混在一起,这句话就读反了。
学习提示
看到 time window,往前找一句:这个窗是关于“开始治疗”的,还是关于“治疗持续”的?在卒中领域,前者通常以小时计(4.5 小时、6 小时、24 小时),后者以天计。
〔注9〕
原文
adjuvant(an ideal adjunct for endovascular thrombectomy)
直译
佐剂/辅助手段
失味点
adjuvant 在中文里最常见的译法是“佐剂”,那是疫苗语境;用在治疗上应该译“辅助治疗”。“佐剂”这个词会让读者以为 NBO 是可有可无的添加物,而作者的立场正好相反:它是取栓之外、能独立起作用的第二种手段,取栓做不了的地方它就顶上去。
学习提示
一个词在不同领域有不同默认译法,翻译时要看语境而不是查词典第一条。adjuvant 在肿瘤里是“辅助化疗”,在疫苗里是“佐剂”,在卒中里是“辅助治疗”。
〔注10〕
原文
18F-fluoromisonidazole (18F-FMISO) PET
直译
18F-氟米索硝唑正电子发射断层扫描
失味点
直译完是一串字母,读者不知道它为什么能“看见缺氧”。它的原理是:FMISO 属于硝基咪唑类,在氧充足的细胞里会被“还原回去”然后离开,只有在低氧细胞里才被还原并滞留——所以图像上的浓聚就代表“这里缺氧”。译名里丢掉这个原理,这个证据的分量就读不出来。
学习提示
看到示踪剂先问“它滞留在什么细胞里”。FMISO=低氧细胞;FDG=高代谢细胞;PiB=淀粉样斑块。这一类“图像即机制”的工具,是临床研究里最直观的证据。
〔注11〕
原文
hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (HIF-1α),a master transcriptional regulator of the cellular response to hypoxia
直译
缺氧诱导因子 1α,细胞缺氧应答的主转录调控因子
失味点
“缺氧诱导因子”这个名字容易被理解成“被缺氧诱导出来的因子”——方向对了一半,但关键在另一半:常氧下它被持续降解,只有缺氧时才稳定下来。所以它的蛋白水平本身就是“缺氧程度的读数”。还有一点容易漏:本文写它“与临床结局正相关”,正相关意味着越高结局越好(与卒中严重程度的关系要看具体变量),而不是越高越差——方向一定要回原文确认。
学习提示
HIF-1α 是“氧感受器”的范式:氧依赖的脯氨酰羟化酶在常氧下羟基化它,VHL 泛素连接酶随后把它降解。这条通路(2019 年诺贝尔生理学或医学奖)值得单独花半小时看一遍。
〔注12〕
原文
We conclude that NBO has significant potential for treating stroke and may represent a novel therapeutic strategy.
直译
我们的结论是:NBO 在治疗卒中方面有可观的潜力,可能代表一种新的治疗策略。
失味点
may represent 比 is 弱了整整一档。而“总结性结论”在中文里一旦写成“我们的结论是”,读者会自动理解成“已经证明”。本文的证据其实是混合的:动物证据多、临床证据少,阳性结果样本量小,还有 Haelewyn 的反证与 Padma 的阴性试验。所以这句结论应该读成“方向有希望、证据还不够”,而不是“NBO 有效”。
学习提示
看综述结论先数情态动词:may/might/could/suggests/has the potential to。作者用弱语气,通常意味着他自己知道证据不够;翻译时把这些词抹平,等于替作者加码。
〔注13〕
原文
cuproptosis
直译
铜死亡
失味点
中文“铜死亡”很容易被当成“铁死亡”的同类项记下来,但它俩的机制完全不同:铁死亡靠脂质过氧化,铜死亡靠铜直接结合三羧酸循环的脂酰化蛋白、造成蛋白毒性应激,且依赖线粒体呼吸。本文把它和铁死亡并列写在同一段,读者容易以为它们是一回事。
学习提示
这一类“金属死亡”近几年命名很密集(ferroptosis 2012、cuproptosis 2022),读新综述时先建一张表:金属、关键蛋白、形态特征、抑制剂。否则很容易被名词带着走。
〔注14〕
原文
…but these effects are not statistically significant./this difference was not statistically significant.
直译
……但这些效应无统计学意义/这一差异无统计学意义
失味点
中文常直接写成“无统计学意义”,读者要么跳过,要么读成“没差别”。它真正说的是:观察到的差异还不足以排除偶然,既不能宣布有效,也不能宣布无效。而且原文这两处的效应方向都是“下降/改善”,只是没达到显著——这和“没有任何变化”是两件不同的事。
学习提示
看到“无统计学意义”,追问三件事:效应量有多大、样本量多少、这篇是先验的还是事后分析。P 值大于 0.05 从来不是“无效”的证据,只是“证据不足”。

附录 · 英文原文

以下为未经改动的英文原文(来源:Europe PMC 开放获取全文 / 出版方摘要)。

The neuroprotective effects of normobaric oxygen therapy after stroke

Journal: 2024;30(7):e14858  |  DOI: 10.1111/cns.14858  |  PMID: 39009510  |  PMCID:

Authors: Chuan Li; Min Jiang; Zhiying Chen; Qiongqiong Hu; Ziying Liu; Junmin Wang; Xiaoping Yin; Jian Wang; Moxin Wu

Abstract

Stroke, including ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke, is a severe and prevalent acute cerebrovascular disease. The development of hypoxia following stroke can trigger a cascade of pathological events, including mitochondrial dysfunction, energy deficiency, oxidative stress, neuroinflammation, and excitotoxicity, all of which are often associated with unfavorable prognosis. Nonetheless, a noninvasive intervention, referred to as normobaric hyperoxia (NBO), is known to have neuroprotective effects against stroke.

NBO can exert neuroprotective effects through various mechanisms, such as the rescue of hypoxic tissues, preservation of the blood–brain barrier, reduction of brain edema, alleviation of neuroinflammation, improvement of mitochondrial function, mitigation of oxidative stress, reduction of excitotoxicity, and inhibition of apoptosis. These mechanisms may help improve the prognosis of stroke patients.

This review summarizes the mechanism by which hypoxia causes brain injury and how NBO can act as a neuroprotective therapy to treat stroke. We conclude that NBO has significant potential for treating stroke and may represent a novel therapeutic strategy.

Keywords: cerebral hypoxia, neuroprotection, normobaric hyperoxia, oxygen therapy, stroke

INTRODUCTION

Stroke, including ischemic stroke and hemorrhagic stroke, is a common cerebrovascular disease caused by insufficient blood supply to the brain or blood vessel rupture within the brain parenchyma., Stroke, the second leading cause of death worldwide after cardiovascular disease, affects more than 15 million people each year. One of the hallmarks of stroke is the interruption of cerebral blood flow (CBF), which depletes the brain of oxygen and glucose. This leads to the disruption of adenosine 5′‐triphosphate (ATP) synthesis, impaired ion homeostasis, and acid–base balance. All these dysfunctions result in cerebral neuropathological changes, such as brain edema, neuroinflammation, and neuronal cell death, eventually leading to severe neurological deficits.

Molecular oxygen is an indispensable component for cellular homeostasis and survival in aerobic organisms, as it is the final receiver of electrons in the mitochondrial respiratory chain and ATP synthesis through phosphate oxidation. Brain tissue accounts for only 2% of the human body weight. It consumes more than 20% of total oxygen to generate ATP to increase the membrane potential required for energy utilization and supply. As the main energy consumer, the brain has low capillary density, is the most vulnerable organ to hypoxia, and relies on a constant oxygen supply. The normal range of partial pressure of arterial oxygen (PaO2) is 11.0–14.4 kPa, and the normal range of arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2) is 95%–98% in adults. Hypoxia is a condition in which the body or a region lacks adequate oxygen at the tissue level. Hypoxia is a common feature after acute stroke and is associated with neurological deficits and increased mortality., Hypoxia immediately causes neuronal cell death and possibly impairs brain function. In addition, mounting evidence suggests that hypoxia affects many pathological aspects of stroke, including neuroinflammation, oxidative stress, mitochondrial impairment, and synaptic dysfunction, which collectively contribute to secondary brain injury (SBI) after stroke.

Therefore, oxygen therapy may delay or mitigate the progression of stroke. Oxygen therapy refers to a medical procedure that relieves hypoxia by increasing the PaO2 in the inhaled gas and SaO2 in the blood. It is widely used for central nervous system (CNS) disease therapy. Standard oxygen therapy includes hyperbaric oxygen (HBO) and normobaric oxygen (NBO) therapy. HBO therapy delivers oxygen at hyperbaric pressure (2.5 atm, equivalent to 253 kPa) to increase PaO2 in tissues. NBO therapy involves the administration of 40%–100% high‐flow oxygen under normal pressure to supplement the oxygen supply and increase the arterial oxygen content. To better understand the neuroprotective effects of NBO treatment after stroke, we briefly summarize the effects of hypoxia and NBO treatment on stroke and discuss the underlying mechanisms involved.

EVIDENCE OF HYPOXIA AFTER STROKE

Previously, Read et al. detected peri‐infarct tissue hypoxia via positron emission tomography (PET) with 18F‐fluoromisonidazole (18F‐FMISO) in ischemic stroke patients. Hypoxia was detected in the peri‐infarct tissue of 9 of the 13 patients within 48 h of stroke onset. The kinetics of intravenous bolus injection of indocyanine green (ICG) in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) were monitored by near‐infrared spectroscopy (NIRS). Compared with those in the unaffected hemisphere, the bolus peak time, peak time, and rise time were increased, and the slope and blood flow index of the infarct site were reduced in the infarcted hemisphere. Lu et al. used quantitative susceptibility‐weighted imaging to more accurately determine hypoperfusion and penumbral hypoxia in patients with AIS. The serum levels of hypoxia‐inducible factor 1α (HIF‐1α), a master transcriptional regulator of the cellular response to hypoxia, were significantly elevated in stroke patients compared with healthy individuals and were positively correlated with clinical outcomes. Hypoxic tissue was observed in middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) model rats by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and pimonidazole staining, and hypoxic areas were observed in both groups. Furthermore, tissue‐integrating oxygen sensors continuously monitor tissue oxygen reduction in rats with carotid artery occlusion.

Similarly, brain tissue oxygen monitoring shows insufficient oxygen supply to brain tissue in most intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) patients. The partial pressure of oxygen in the brain tissue of ICH patients was monitored by neuromonitoring probes and found to be significantly lower in the hemorrhagic brain tissue than in healthy tissue. Recent studies have reported that serum HIF‐1α levels are markedly higher in ICH patients than in healthy controls and are closely related to hemorrhagic severity and 90‐day outcomes. In addition, 18F‐FMISO PET/MRI imaging revealed that hypoxia is expected in the perihematomal area in collagenase VII‐induced ICH model rats and the uptake of 18F‐FMISO significantly increased 18–24 h after ICH. With hematoma formation, the increase in intracranial pressure and secondary hematoma volume further exacerbated brain tissue hypoxia in a porcine ICH model. In contrast, using 18F‐FMISO PET images, Hirano et al. showed that patients with ICH did not exhibit tissue hypoxia.

PATHOPHYSIOLOGY AND SIGNALING PATHWAYS AFFECTED BY HYPOXIA AFTER STROKE

Energy deficiency due to hypoxia

After stroke, CBF is significantly reduced at the injury site, which limits the oxygen supply, especially to neurons. Mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation is inhibited during hypoxia, resulting in reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulation and ATP synthesis reduction (Figure). The ATP concentration and total adenine nucleotide content are significantly reduced, and glycogen is closely exhausted in the penumbra area in MCAO model rats. In hypoxic tissues, ADP generated from ATP hydrolysis is further metabolized to AMP and then converted to hypoxanthine and inosine, resulting in the overall depletion of adenine nucleotides.

[FIGURE 1] Pathophysiology due to hypoxia after stroke. Mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation is inhibited, accumulating ROS and decreasing ATP synthesis. An insufficient supply of ATP leads to ion imbalance, depolarization of neurons and mitochondria, and Ca2+ influx. Neurons release glutamate and accumulate extracellularly, resulting in excessive activation of NMDARs and AMPARs, and PSD95 and nNOS bind to NMDARs, further promoting Ca2+ influx. Ca2+ influx leads to the opening of the mitochondrial MPTP and the release of Cytc, and Ca2+ activates calmodulin, stimulating calcineurin, which subsequently dephosphorylates and activates DAPK to induce apoptosis. Phosphatase and PTEN are recruited to NMDARs and induce neuronal death. The BBB is destroyed, and activated microglia and astrocytes produce and release many inflammatory mediators, which induce neuroinflammation.

Hypoxia leads to mitochondrial dysfunction and oxidative stress‐induced injury. At the same time, energy deficiency also contributes to ion imbalances that change Na+, K+, and Ca2+ concentrations, leading to neuronal depolarization, glutamate release, and glutamate accumulation in the extracellular space. Excessive glutamate activates N‐methyl‐D‐aspartate receptors (NMDARs), inducing neurotoxicity, neuronal cell death, and ultimately CNS damage.

Mitochondrial dysfunction, oxidative stress, and related signaling pathways

Mitochondria are essential for maintaining energy homeostasis. When ATP synthesis is blocked by hypoxia, the morphology and function of mitochondria are substantially altered. Ca2+ influx leads to mitochondrial permeability transition pore (MPTP) opening and cytochrome C (CytC) release (Figure). Moreover, an insufficient ATP supply triggers mitochondrial membrane depolarization, which is characterized by Na+ influx and K+ efflux.,

Ferroptosis is a form of programmed cell death characterized by high intracellular iron accumulation and oxidative damage caused by iron‐dependent lipid peroxidation.,, Cell morphology is mainly characterized by a decrease in mitochondrial volume with a reduction of the condensed mitochondrial membrane density, the rupture of the mitochondrial outer membrane and the decline or disappearance of mitochondrial cristae, but the nucleus remains intact in structure without chromatin condensation., The iron content in brain tissue increased, mediated ferroptosis, and exacerbated SBI in cerebral ischemia–reperfusion in a mouse model of MCAO., Second, the iron released from the hematoma after ICH may lead to SBI., Hemoglobin released from lysed red blood cells can be engulfed by macrophages and microglia around the hematoma and metabolized into Fe2+, which in turn mediates the production of ROS and lipid peroxidation., Excess Fe2+ is transported from microglia and accumulates in neurons, forming hydroxyl radicals through the Fenton reaction. These radicals attack lipid membranes, proteins, and DNA, thereby destroying cellular function and promoting neuronal cell death.,,

Cuproptosis is a recently defined form of cell death characterized by free copper accumulation and protein lipidation in mitochondria, leading to cytotoxic stress and, ultimately, cell death. This process depends on mitochondrial respiration and the tricarboxylic acid cycle. Copper directly binds to the lipid components of the tricarboxylic acid cycle, resulting in the aggregation of acylated proteins and the loss of iron–sulfur cluster proteins. The expression of proteins in the mitochondrial oxidative respiratory chain is reduced, and the activity of mitochondrial complexes I and III and ATP content are decreased, resulting in proteotoxic stress and cell death. Therefore, cuproptosis is speculated to be a key mechanism for the death of hypoxic–ischemic nerve cells.

Hypoxia can exacerbate oxidative stress. In addition to mitochondrial dysfunction, hypoxia leads to oxidative stress, which causes cellular and brain tissue injury after stroke. Oxidative stress disturbs the balance between ROS production and antioxidant defense. It plays a significant role in SBI after stroke. Considering the intimate connection between ROS and mitochondrial metabolism, mitochondrial dysfunction is often related to oxidative stress pathologies. During stroke hypoxia, oxidative damage and excessive Ca2+ contribute to MPTP induction, further promoting mitochondrial damage‐associated molecular patterns to activate downstream inflammatory responses.

Neuroinflammation

In the CNS, neurons are sensitive to energy and oxygen. Once neurons lack sufficient energy and oxygen, many pathological events will occur, including neuroinflammation. Cerebral hypoxia can cause damage to the brain microvascular system and blood–brain barrier (BBB), loss of tight junction proteins (TJPs), increased paracellular permeability, cytotoxic edema, and immune cell infiltration, thereby triggering an inflammatory response (Figure). Second, brain hypoxia activates inflammatory transcription factors and induces the synthesis and release of inflammatory mediators, cytokines, and enzymes., Activated microglia and astrocytes produce and release many inflammatory mediators, such as TNF‐α, IL‐1α, IFN‐γ, ROS, nitric oxide (NO), and matrix metalloproteinase‐9 (MMP‐9), which further exacerbate the inflammatory response and brain injury.,,, In addition, hypoxia induces the expression of proinflammatory mediators (NO and TNF‐α) in microglia by regulating HIF‐1α.,

Excitotoxicity and related signaling pathways

Typically, glutamate reuptake is an energy‐driven process. Under hypoxic conditions, ATP‐dependent neuronal physiological activities, such as ion transport and neurotransmitter reuptake, immediately decline. Hypoxia induces neuronal cell glutamate release after stroke. Glutamate then accumulates extracellularly, triggering excessive excitotoxicity events in neurons. The accumulated excitatory neurotransmitter glutamate overstimulates NMDARs and α‐amino‐3‐hydroxy‐5‐methyl‐4‐isoxazolepropionic acid receptors (AMPARs) and promotes a large influx of Ca2+ ions into the cell, promoting neuronal depolarization., When neurons are depolarized, voltage‐gated Ca2+ channels and sodium channels are opened, allowing Ca2+ and Na+ to flow inward, where they are coupled with NMDARs and APMARs. Excessive Ca2+ influx perturbs ionic homeostasis, resulting in Ca2+ overload both in the mitochondria and cytosol., This ion imbalance triggers the influx of water into neurons, causing edema and the dissolution of neuronal cells and tissue. Moreover, these changes stimulate a variety of proteases, lipases, kinases, phosphatases, endonucleases, and free radicals, as well as biological processes that cause neuronal cell death, such as calpain activation, oxidative stress, and mitochondrial impairment., Overall, these cellular dysfunctions are termed excitotoxicity and involve NMDARs and AMPARs. The activation of NMDARs triggers neuronal excitotoxicity and subsequent apoptosis during ischemic stroke.

This series of biological events caused by cerebral hypoxia leads to brain metabolic imbalance and constitutes the core pathological event of brain injury after stroke. The direct consequences are neuronal cell death and irreversible neurological injury. This stimulation also triggers multiple cascades and activates mitochondria‐dependent apoptosis after stroke. After NMDARs are activated by Ca2+ influx, phosphatase and tensin homolog (PTEN) is recruited to GluN2B‐NMDARs. PTEN signaling may induce neuronal cell death. As a Ca2+/calmodulin‐dependent serine/threonine‐protein kinase, dephosphorylated death‐associated protein kinase (DAPK) contributes to apoptotic cell death. After stroke, NMDAR overactivation promotes Ca2+ influx and calcineurin, dephosphorylating and activating DAPK (Figure). Both a selective NMDAR antagonist (MK‐801) and a calcineurin inhibitor (FK506) prevent the dephosphorylation of DAPK after ischemia, thereby exerting neuroprotective effects. These findings indicate that DAPK may be a potential therapeutic target for AIS. In addition, NMDAR‐mediated Ca2+ influx activates Ca2+‐dependent phosphatased calcineurin, rapidly increasing nuclear C/EBPβ and induces neuroexcitotoxicity. Neuronal NMDARs contribute to NO production, which is associated with Ca2+/calmodulin and regulated by NO synthase (nNOS). The binding of postsynaptic density protein 95 (PSD95) to NMDARs and nNOS enhances Ca2+ influx, a hallmark of excitotoxicity., PSD95/nNOS signaling plays a pivotal role in ischemic stroke. Inhibiting nNOS activity ameliorates neurological deficits through pharmacological or genetic means in a cerebral ischemic model. Cerebral ischemia enhances NMDAR/PSD95/nNOS interactions in neurons, thus further aggravating brain injury in experimental ischemic stroke.

UNDERLYING MECHANISMS OF NBO THERAPY AFTER STROKE

Rescue of tissue hypoxia and metabolism

AIS results in marked heterogeneous changes in tissue oxygenation, with severe hypoperfusion in the core and a moderate reduction in blood flow in the penumbra. Using electron paramagnetic resonance oximetry to measure localized interstitial partial oxygen (pO2), Liu et al. reported that interstitial pO2 rapidly decreased to approximately 4% in the core and 30% of preischemic values in the penumbra in a rat cerebral ischemia model. They further demonstrated that 95% of NBO administration maintained penumbral interstitial pO2 levels close to preischemic levels during ischemia and twofold increased pO2 levels during reperfusion (Figure). Oxygen is a vital substrate that supports virtually all metabolic processes. In a rat model of distal MCAO, NBO (100% O2) administration caused an immediate and progressive increase in oxyhemoglobin concentration, nearly doubling in the ischemic core within 1 h, preserved CBF in the core and penumbra, suppressed peri‐infarct size and depolarization and diminished the deleterious effects on CBF and metabolic load.

[FIGURE 2] Molecular mechanisms of NBO treatment. Various critical molecules and mechanisms are involved in the neuroprotective effects of NBO treatment. AIF, apoptosis‐inducing factor; AMPK, AMP‐activated protein kinase; ATP, adenosine 5′‐triphosphate; BAX, Bcl2‐associated X; Bcl‐2, B‐cell lymphoma‐2; Bcl‐Xl, B‐cell lymphoma‐extra‐large; CBF, cerebral blood flow; Cytc, cytochrome C; EAAT, glutamate transporters; GPX4, glutathione peroxidase 4; GSH, glutathione; HbO2, oxyhemoglobin; HO‐1, heme oxygenase‐1; mGluR, glutamate receptors; MMP‐2/9, matrix metalloproteinase‐2/9; NADPH, triphosphopyridine nucleotide; NCX, Na+/Ca2+ exchanger; pO2, partial oxygen; ROS, reactive oxygen species; VEGE, vascular endothelial growth factor; Zn, zinc.

Under hypoxic conditions, glucose metabolism in the brain switches to anaerobic glycolysis, drastically reducing ATP production. Metabolic abnormalities are another major contributor to brain injury after stroke. NBO has been shown to reduce ATP consumption in the marginal zone tissue and acidosis in focal cerebral ischemia. Using multivoxel magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging, lactate, a marker of aerobic metabolism, decreased during NBO administration via inhalation of oxygen at a flow rate of 45 L/min through a face mask for 8 h in stroke patients. The penumbra can be rescued if blood flow is restored in time., NBO can be used as an early intervention to preserve the penumbra and expand the window of reperfusion therapy. In a Sprague–Dawley rat model of transient MCAO and permanent ischemia, Ding et al. demonstrated that ethanol combined with NBO administration (95% O2) significantly attenuated the expression of monocarboxylate transporters and lactate levels. In a rat model of permanent MCAO, NBO therapy significantly increased ATP production, which was associated with reduced transcriptional and translational levels of the hyperglycolysis enzymes glucose transporter 1 and 3, phosphofructokinase 1, and lactate dehydrogenase. In addition, NBO significantly decreased AMPK mRNA and protein expression levels. The occurrence of stroke first leads to ischemia and hypoxia in tissues, which in turn affects the metabolism of tissues and the occurrence of a series of pathological events. NBO therapy effectively provides tissue support and rescues tissue hypoxia and metabolism after stroke, thereby reducing the occurrence of subsequent pathological events.

Protecting against BBB impairment and ameliorating brain edema

Fujiwara et al. reported that applying 100% NBO for 2 h did not worsen hemorrhage severity, brain edema, or neurological outcomes on Day 3 in a collagenase type VII‐induced ICH model in Sprague–Dawley rats. Gaberel et al. demonstrated that NBO treatment for 30 min induced rapid and progressive reduction of the apparent hematoma on longitudinal T2*‐weighted images in a collagenase‐induced and direct intrastriatal injection blood ICH model in Swiss mice. NBO therapy (90% O2) for 6 h daily for three consecutive days improved the neurological severity score (NSS), attenuated brain edema and cellular apoptosis, and suppressed HIF‐1α and VEGF in the perihematomal region in a collagenase‐induced ICH model in Sprague–Dawley rats. NBO or HBO at three atmospheres initiated within 30 min for 1 h attenuated brain edema and BBB disruption in a mouse model of autologous blood‐ or collagenase‐induced ICH. Early oxygen therapy attenuated posthemorrhagic occludin degradation, MMP‐9 activation, and HIF‐1α expression (Figure). In addition, NBO treatment rescued microglia‐mediated synaptic pruning in collagenase‐induced ICH in mice. NBO therapy effectively restored postsynaptic protein (PSD and NR2B) expression levels and improved the loss of synaptic spines, which play a neuroprotective role after ICH.

Liang et al. revealed that NBO treatment (100% O2) for 30 min slowed BBB damage, as evidenced by reduced Evan blue leakage, edema, and hemorrhagic volume at 3, 5, and 7 h in a rat model of MCAO and reperfusion (MCAO/R). NBO‐mediated protection of the BBB was sustained during tissue‐type plasminogen activator (t‐PA) administration, which revealed that NBO may be an effective adjuvant for extending the time window for t‐PA thrombolysis. NBO (100% O2) treatment significantly reduced BBB damage by reducing the expression of MMP‐9, the loss of TJPs, and the degradation of occludin and claudin‐5 in ischemic cerebral microvessels, thereby improving the neurological function of rats with MCAO/R and stroke patients., NBO (95% O2) treatment inhibited NADPH oxidase activity and MMP‐9 induction, which has been demonstrated to protect against BBB and brain edema in a rat model of MCAO., Yang et al. revealed that exposure to 60% and 100% NBO during reperfusion following MCAO improved neurological impairment scores and alleviated brain edema, neutrophil infiltration and infarct volume after 24 and 48 h. Moreover, 100% NBO further improved the parameters. In addition, the molecular mechanisms by which NBO reduces brain edema may involve a reduction in aquaporin 4 and Na+/H+ exchanger 1 and an increase in HIF‐1α expression. NBO (40% O2) administration significantly improved blood perfusion in the ischemic area early and effectively alleviated BBB permeability, cerebral edema, and neurological dysfunction in MCAO model mice.

In contrast, Elmira Pasban reported that early NBO administration for 90 min did not reduce ischemic brain injury and exerted protective effects against vasogenic brain edema formation or BBB disruption in adult male Sprague–Dawley rats subjected to MCAO for 90 min followed by 24 h of reperfusion. However, in general, NBO treatment after stroke can reduce brain edema and BBB permeability and play a protective role in the BBB.

Ameliorating the neuroinflammatory response

Esposito et al. revealed that the protective effect of NBO persists for up to 2 weeks by suppressing microglia and astrocyte reactions and reducing infarct volume in a rat model of transient MCAO (Figure). NBO administration alleviated brain damage and sensorimotor impairment by preventing neuronal cell death and microglial inflammation in a rat model that mimics a true transient ischemic attack. In addition, HBO pretreatment downregulated the JNK/STAT pathway, attenuated M1 microglial polarization, and reduced the expression of proinflammatory factors and MMP‐9, thereby alleviating neuroinflammation and reducing ICH‐induced neurological damage and brain edema in an autologous blood‐induced model of ICH in rats.

Improving mitochondrial function and antioxidant stress

NBO administration during 2 h of MCAO and 1 h of reperfusion reduced the infarct volume without increasing oxidative stress through the expression of heme oxygenase‐1 (HO‐1) and protein carbonyl formation (Figure). NBO treatment maintained the homeostasis of glutathione peroxidase 4 (GPX4) and NADPH oxidase 4 oxidoreductases and rescued MCAO/R‐induced downregulation of connexin 43 protein in astrocytes. In addition, NBO treatment attenuated ischemia‐induced mitochondrial CytC release, which could be blocked by inhibiting the GPX4 or connexin 43 pathway. Dong et al. reported that NBO therapy significantly reduced zinc accumulation and mitochondrial CytC release and stabilized the mitochondrial membrane potential in penumbra tissue. Still, the zinc content in the ischemic core area did not decrease in a rat model of MCAO. These findings indicated that NBO administration prevented ischemia‐induced mitochondrial zinc accumulation, thereby improving mitochondrial function. Compared with control treatment, NBO treatment significantly decreased ROS levels at 3 and 24 h after reperfusion. NBO treatment inhibited NADPH oxidase activity and reduced ROS production, thereby alleviating oxidative stress caused by ischemia and protecting the brain in a rat model of MCAO., Compared with any treatment alone, 95% NBO and ethanol (EtOH) combination therapy effectively suppressed the ADP/ATP ratio, ROS generation, and nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate oxidase (NOX) activity and maximized pyruvate dehydrogenase (PDH) activation and protein expression, which exerted a synergistic neuroprotective effect after reperfusion. Cai et al. revealed that following t‐PA in a rat model of focal middle cerebral artery (MCA) stroke, NBO (60% O2) combined with hypothermia (Hypo) or EtOH effectively decreased neurological deficit and infarct volume, as well as ROS production, compared with monotherapies, this finding suggested that the PKC‐Akt‐NOX pathway is involved in the mechanism of antioxidative injury.

The survival of neurons largely depends on the energy provided by mitochondria. Mitochondrial dysfunction after stroke not only reduces ATP production but also produces a large amount of ROS and increases oxidative stress. After stroke, NBO treatment can effectively ameliorate mitochondrial dysfunction and reduce oxidative stress, thus playing a neuroprotective role.

Reducing calcium overload and neuroexcitotoxicity

After prolonged or intermittent NBO preconditioning in a rat model of MCAO, the neurologic deficit score significantly decreased, and the serum TNF‐α level and glutamate transporter (EAAT1, EAAT2, and EAAT3) expression levels in brain tissue significantly increased, which induced cerebral ischemic tolerance in rats (Figure). Nasrniya et al. also showed that NBO induced cerebral ischemic tolerance in rats. Intermittent NBO pretreatment reduced the infarct volume and neurologic deficit score, increased the glutathione level in the subcortex region, and significantly upregulated the expression of metabotropic glutamate receptors (mGluRs I and II) in the MCAO model rats. The expression of the Na+/Ca2+ exchanger (NCX) was increased after NBO pretreatment in MCAO model rats. The expression of NCX2 and NCX3 in the core, NCX1, NCX2, and NCX3 in the penumbra, and NCX1 and NCX3 in the subcortex are increased. In addition, Haelewyn et al. demonstrated that NBO attenuated NMDA‐induced neuronal degeneration in rats and reduced NMDA‐induced Ca2+ influx in cultured neuronal cells. However, NBO increased ischemia‐induced injury in a rat MCAO model and an oxygen–glucose deprivation (OGD) neuronal model.

Hypoxia after stroke induces glutamate release from neurons and extracellular accumulation, which in turn triggers excitotoxic events. Moreover, the opening of Ca2+ channels lead to the influx of Ca2+, which overloads Ca2+ in the cytoplasm and mitochondria and further exacerbates excitotoxicity. NBO treatment after stroke regulates the expression of glutamate transporters, metabotropic glutamate receptors and NCX, reduces the influx of Ca2+ and neuroexcitotoxicity, and plays a neuroprotective role.

Inhibiting neuronal cell death

Apoptosis plays an important role in neuronal cell death after stroke. NBO combined with minocycline effectively reduced transient focal cerebral ischemia‐induced brain injury in a rat model of MCAO. Compared with monotherapy, combination therapy more effectively inhibited the expression of MMP‐2/9, the degradation of occludin, the activation of caspase‐3/9 and the expression of apoptotic‐inducing factor (AIF) in ischemic brain tissue (Figure). Geng et al. suggested that in a rat model of MCAO, NBO combined with ethanol significantly reduced the expression of proapoptotic proteins (BAX, caspase‐3, and AIF) and increased the expression of antiapoptotic factors (Bcl‐2 and Bcl‐xL). This intervention reduced the percentage of apoptotic cells by 49%, thereby protecting neurological function. NBO administration started after 30 min of ischemia in rats and lasted for 2, 4, or 8 h. NBO treatment for 8 h more effectively reduced infarct volume and oxidative stress than other treatment durations. Moreover, DNA fragment generation and caspase‐3 activity in the cortical penumbra were reduced, effectively reducing apoptosis. By combining EtOH or Hypo with t‐PA, 60% NBO enhanced neuronal antiapoptotic effects by reducing the expression of the proapoptotic protein AIF, activated caspase‐3, and Bax and increasing the expression of the antiapoptotic protein Bcl‐2. In addition, prolonged NBO treatment during ischemia and the early phase of reperfusion alleviated neuronal apoptosis by inhibiting the MMP‐2/PARP‐1 pathway in MCAO model rats.

Moreover, Wang et al. reported that NBO administration not only reduced neuronal apoptosis but also alleviated autophagy in the early stages of reperfusion after ischemia/reperfusion. LC3 and Beclin1 were significantly decreased, and p63 was significantly increased at 2 h and 6 h of reperfusion. In conclusion, NBO treatment effectively reduces stroke‐induced apoptosis and protects neurological function after stroke. Notably, NBO treatment can effectively reduce the generation of ROS, inhibit oxidative stress, reduce the release of Cytc from mitochondria, and ameliorate mitochondrial dysfunction after stroke., Thus, NBO treatment may reduce the production of ROS and hydroxyl radicals by inhibiting oxidative stress, reducing the oxidative damage caused by lipid peroxidation, and increasing the expression of related proteins or enzymes in mitochondria. These changes affect ferroptosis and cuproptosis and thereby improve mitochondrial dysfunction and patient prognosis. However, definite evidence for this mechanism is lacking, and this mechanism warrants further study.

CLINICAL EVIDENCE

NBO may freeze the penumbra and extend the time window for reperfusion, making it an ideal adjunct for endovascular thrombectomy., The role of NBO in clinical trials is summarized in Table.

[TABLE 1] The effect of NBO in clinical trials.

SubjectsSample sizeTreatment and durationOutcomeReferences
Patients with acute stroke and perfusion‐diffusion “mismatch” on MRI16100% O2, 45 L/min, 8 h, by simple facemaskDWI lesion volume and NIHSS score decreased[[112]]
Patients experiencing a first‐ever massive middle cerebral artery infarction4640% O2, 2 L/min, 132.9 (range, 48.0–168.5) h, by venturi maskMortality and complications decreased[[113]]
Patients with acute stroke and perfusion‐diffusion “mismatch” on MRI6100% O2, 45 L/min, 8 h, by simple facemaskN‐acetylaspartate retained and lactate reduced in the brain[[73]]
Patients with ICA and/or proximal MCA occlusion and a diffusion/perfusion mismatch at presentation14100% O2, 45 L/min, 8 h, by simple facemaskA stable mismatch of 4 h or longer occurred outside the time window of thrombolytic therapy[[114]]
Patients with acute stroke and perfusion‐diffusion “mismatch” on MRI19100% O2, 45 L/min, 8 h, by simple facemaskIschemic lesions growth was attenuated[[115]]
Patients with AIS231100% O2, 10 L/min, 4 h, by simple facemask, endovascular treatmentThe infarct volume was reduced, and the incidence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhagic, mortality, and adverse events were decreased[[117]]
Patients with anterior circulation stroke17550% FiO2, 15 L/min, 6 h, by venturi mask, mechanical thrombectomyThe infarct volume was reduced, and the 90‐day mortality was reduced[[118]]
Patients with posterior circulation stroke8750% FiO2, 15 L/min, 6 h, by venturi mask, mechanical thrombectomyThe infarct volume was reduced, and the 90‐day mortality was reduced[[119]]
Patients with AIS40100% O2, 10 L/min, 12 h, by simple facemaskClinical score (NIHSS, mRS, and BI) no difference[[120]]

NBO therapy was safe and feasible in an initial clinical trial and was associated with transient improvements in clinical deficits and MRI lesion volumes at 4 h in AIS patients. The mean relative cerebral blood volume (CBV) and CBF increased significantly at 4 h and 24 h in the NBO group. Chiu et al. used 40% oxygen inhalation via a venturi mask to treat patients with severe AIS. Compared with nasal cannula oxygen therapy, venturi masks are associated with lower mortality and fewer comorbidities in patients with severe AIS. Singhal et al. monitored the signal levels of lactic acid and N‐acetylaspartate using the software package LCModel and found that NBO treatment retained N‐acetylaspartate and reduced lactate levels in the brains of AIS patients. This finding suggested that NBO can improve aerobic metabolism in the ischemic brain and preserve neuronal integrity. Subsequent trials by Singhal's group further demonstrated the safety and efficacy of NBO. Compared with controls, patients outside the thrombolytic treatment time window experienced greater diffusion/perfusion mismatch on MRI 4 h or more after NBO treatment. Wu et al. also showed that 4 h of NBO therapy can reduce the growth of ischemic lesions. In addition, randomized controlled trial protocols are being explored for the efficacy and safety of NBO in patients with acute ICH.

According to several recent clinical reports, NBO combined with endovascular thrombectomy seems to be a safe and feasible treatment for AIS. Li et al. reported that compared with EVT, NBO + EVT can significantly reduce the infarct volume, improve the prognosis, and decrease the incidence of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, mortality, and adverse events, but these effects are not statistically significant. In addition, Cheng et al. reported that adjuvant high‐flow NBO treatment after mechanical thrombectomy for anterior circulation stroke can significantly reduce the infarct volume and 90‐day mortality rate and effectively improve the clinical outcome of patients with anterior circulation stroke within 6 h of onset. Similarly, they performed the same experiment in posterior circulation stroke patients. Infarct volume and 90‐day mortality were reduced, but this difference was not statistically significant. Conversely, a clinical trial has also shown that NBO has no effect. Padma et al. conducted NBO treatment on Indian AIS patients and analyzed a series of clinical scores (NIHSS, mRS, and BI), which showed that NBO did not improve the clinical outcomes of stroke patients.

POTENTIAL ADVERSE EFFECTS OF NBO ON STROKE OUTCOMES

NBO therapy not only exerts protective effects on the brain but also may produce adverse effects, such as oxygen toxicity, cerebral vasoconstriction, neuroexcitotoxicity, and lung injury. Quintard et al. showed that NBO treatment increased the glutamate content in the brains of patients with severe traumatic brain injury, causing brain excitotoxicity and exacerbating SBI. A high oxygen supply to the brain is well known to potentially cause cerebral vasoconstriction, which results in insufficient cerebral hypoperfusion. This change can increase intracranial pressure, enlarge brain hematomas and edema, deteriorate neurological function and have other negative effects., High concentrations of oxygen can easily cause oxygen toxicity. Alva et al. summarized the mechanism of NBO‐induced oxygen toxicity and discussed strategies to improve the damage caused by hyperoxia. The formation of ROS is the biochemical basis of oxygen toxicity and one of the causes of SBI. When excessively high concentrations of oxygen accumulate in brain tissue, ROS levels in neuronal cells further increase, thus affecting the signaling pathway in mitochondria and activating the release of CytC, which leads to cell death and accelerates the progression of tissue damage. In addition, ROS can cause lipid peroxidation, protein oxidation, and DNA damage.,, However, ROS can also increase the activity or expression of antioxidant enzymes in cells to remove excessive ROS., Whether NBO treatment leads to an increase in ROS, which can cause damage to neurons, remains debated. At present, the generally accepted view for treating AIS is that the benefits of NBO treatment significantly outweigh the potential risk of ROS., Second, oxygen toxicity may exacerbate lung injury and cause pulmonary hypertension and pulmonary fibrosis. High concentrations of oxygen enter the lungs, replacing the nitrogen present in the alveoli and rapidly diffusing into the plasma, causing the alveoli to collapse and reducing alveolar volume. In addition, because human organs (heart, digestive tract, eyes, etc.) are sensitive to high concentrations of oxygen, NBO may cause symptoms such as angina, nausea and vomiting, and lens degeneration.,

To reduce potential adverse reactions to NBO treatment, the oxygen concentration and oxygen inhalation time should be controlled, and brain tissue oxygen monitoring or cerebral microdialysis should be performed. Controlling NBO (100% O2, 10 L/min) treatment for 4–6 h may increase the effectiveness of treatment for patients with acute ischemic stroke. Cerebral microdialysis technology can continuously and dynamically monitor the levels of substances closely related to oxygen therapy in the brain, such as glucose, lactic acid, ROS‐related substances, neurotransmitters, and brain injury markers. Before oxygen inhalation, the solution should be heated and humidified first, and atomized inhalation should be regularly administered to reduce the stimulation effect. Patients should be encouraged to take deep breaths, cough more and change positions frequently to prevent secretions from blocking the respiratory tract. NBO has potential protective effects in the treatment of stroke, but strategies to avoid the occurrence of adverse reactions and maximize the effect of NBO warrant further study.

CONCLUSIONS AND PERSPECTIVES

Oxygen is essential for sustaining life. Stroke causes insufficient blood and oxygen supply to the brain, triggering a series of pathological injuries, including mitochondrial dysfunction, energy deficiency, oxidative stress, neuroinflammation, and excitotoxicity. Oxygen therapy can effectively slow the occurrence of pathological events and prevent further damage to the brain. This review summarizes the effects and related mechanisms of NBO therapy after stroke, including rescuing tissue hypoxia, protecting the BBB, reducing brain edema and neuroinflammation, improving mitochondrial dysfunction, resisting oxidative stress, and reducing excitotoxicity and apoptosis, this review also summarizes the role of NBO in clinical trials. NBO is a simple and noninvasive therapy with marked advantages and can be used for early stroke treatment. However, controversies and challenges regarding the application of oxygen therapy in stroke patients persist. For example, which patients are suitable for oxygen therapy? When is the best time for oxygen therapy? How can the concentration, time, and method of oxygen therapy be determined? These issues need to be further explored. Therefore, we look forward to more studies that can evaluate the role of oxygen therapy in stroke treatment to provide more accurate and useful information for clinical practice, more treatment options, and better prognosis for stroke patients.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

The initial idea for this review was conceived by M.X.W., J.W., X.P.Y., and C.L., and the manuscript was written and revised by C.L., M.X.W., M.J., and Z.Y.C. In addition, Z.Y.C., Q.Q.H., Z.Y.L., and J.M.W. contributed to the preparation of the illustrations; J.W. and M.J. edited the manuscript; and C.L., J.W., and M.X.W. read, reviewed, and approved the final manuscript. All the authors approved the final version of the manuscript.

FUNDING INFORMATION

This study was partially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82260209 and 81960221 to XPY; 82371339 to JW), the Jiangxi Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (20232BAB206046 to MXW), the Science and Technology Project Founded by the Education Department of Jiangxi Province (GJJ201834 to MXW), the Jiangxi Provincial Health Commission Science and Technology Plan project (202212021 to MXW), and the Natural Science Foundation of Henan Province for Young Scholars (242300421515 to QQH).

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

Jian Wang is an editorial board member of CNS Neuroscience and Therapeutics and a coauthor of this article. To minimize bias, he was excluded from all editorial decision‐making related to the acceptance of this article for publication. The other authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Li C, Jiang M, Chen Z, et al. The neuroprotective effects of normobaric oxygen therapy after stroke. CNS Neurosci Ther. 2024;00:e14858. doi: 10.1111/cns.14858

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

REFERENCES

Associated Data

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.