艾司氯胺酮经 NTF3/PI3K/AKT 通路在脑出血小鼠中发挥神经保护作用
下划线 = 中文容易“变味”或丢信息的词句:红线带编号 = 15 条注释卡(悬停看、点击跳转)。一句话概括这篇:一个麻醉药被拿去治脑出血,作者真正想证明的不是“血止住了”,而是“神经元少死了几个”。英文原文附于文末
摘要(全译)
艾司氯胺酮(esketamine,ESK)是 NMDA 受体的非竞争性拮抗剂,能调节中枢神经系统内的神经递质信号。但 ESK 对脑出血(intracerebral hemorrhage,ICH)的具体机制和治疗潜力,仍然不清楚。本研究要回答的就是这一句:在 ICH 动物模型上,ESK 能不能促进神经修复、改善神经功能结局。
模型是用胶原酶注入纹状体的办法在小鼠身上造出 ICH。造模之后测体重、神经功能缺损和行为学变化。给 ESK 之后,ICH 的若干项指标明显改善。作者随后做了 mRNA 转录组测序,又做了网络药理学分析,把 ESK 的靶点指向神经营养因子 3(neurotrophin-3,NTF3)和 PI3K/AKT 信号通路。接着用 Western blot 和免疫荧光看 NTF3 的蛋白表达水平与细胞定位。
在小鼠纹状体里感染腺相关病毒 28 天之后(这句原文的因果写反了,见“结果四”的说明),ESK 的治疗作用明显减弱,说明 NTF3 在 ESK 对 ICH 小鼠的神经保护里是不可缺的一环。用 PI3K 抑制剂 LY294002 压住 PI3K/AKT 通路后,ESK 的疗效也明显被削弱,说明这条通路参与了 ESK 在 ICH 小鼠体内的神经修复。
结论是两句话:ESK 治疗明显改善了 ICH 动物模型的功能结局,并表现出神经保护作用;ESK 对 NTF3/PI3K/AKT 通路的激活,说明它在脑出血治疗上有潜力。
关键词:艾司氯胺酮、脑出血、神经保护、NTF3、PI3K/AKT 信号通路。
引言(全译)
脑出血(ICH)是脑动脉破裂后血液急性渗入脑实质所造成的脑损伤。全世界每年约有 290 万人发生 ICH。在美国,每年约有 8 万人发生 ICH,约占全部卒中的 10%–15%。尽管近年做过不少临床前和临床试验,仍未有任何一种治疗能显著改善 ICH 后的死亡率或神经功能结局。所以,能改善预后、促进卒中后康复与恢复的新疗法,是被急需的。
艾司氯胺酮(ESK)是一种含氮脂环化合物,是氯胺酮的 S 型异构体,广泛用作镇痛、镇静和麻醉药。作为强效的 NMDA 受体拮抗剂,ESK 在中枢神经系统里作用关键:它通过作用于谷氨酸受体,产生快速的镇静麻醉效应。已有若干研究报道 ESK 的神经保护作用。但它的临床应用潜力——尤其是在 ICH 中的神经保护作用——仍未被充分探索。
神经营养因子 3(NTF3,也叫 NT-3)是神经营养因子家族的成员。神经生长因子(NGF)是这个家族的原型成员,在发育过程中促进交感神经元和感觉神经元的存活。NTF3 在神经系统里承担多项生理功能:神经元存活与发育、突触可塑性、神经损伤修复,以及抗炎与神经保护作用。已有一项递送系统研究显示,提高 NTF3 水平对 ICH 的细胞和大鼠具有保护作用。
PI3K/AKT 通路是 NTF3 介导的下游通路,参与细胞增殖、存活、分化和代谢等多种过程。PI3K 通过激活蛋白激酶 B(AKT),磷酸化多种底物蛋白,例如糖原合成酶激酶 3β(GSK3B)和血清糖皮质激素调节激酶 1(SGK1)。多项研究显示 PI3K/AKT 通路与 ICH 关系密切。
作者提出的假设是:ICH 之后,NTF3 的激活会促进由 PI3K/AKT 介导的神经营养相关通路;本研究的目的就是弄清 ESK 在 ICH 小鼠中的功能角色。
方法与模型(精译)
动物。雄性 C57BL/6 小鼠,8–10 周龄,20–30 g。动物实验经郑州大学动物伦理委员会批准(批号 ZZUIRB 2022-31),并遵循 ARRIVE 2.0 指南。
造模。在立体定向引导下,向右侧纹状体注射 0.075 U 的胶原酶 VII-S 造 ICH 模型;假手术组注射等体积生理盐水。随机分组后,按各自的剂量、途径和时间点给予 ESK(恒瑞,江苏;50 mg/2 mL)、LY294002(MCE,美国;10 nmol/2 μL 或 8 mg/kg)以及腺相关病毒(AAV2/9-U6-shRNANTF3-WPRE;2 μL;1×1013 V.G/mL)。
称重与行为学。在固定时间点称体重并记录。体重比按“某固定时间点体重 ÷ 初始体重 × 100%”计算。神经功能用神经功能缺损评分、转棒实验(rotarod)、走横梁(beam walking)和网格行走(grid walking)评估。造模后第 1、3、7、14 天做行为学,用来定最佳剂量;为评价急性期之后药物对运动和神经功能的作用,又在第 1、3、7 天做评估。
分子与形态学。用 PCR 检测 AAV 感染,用 Western blot 看蛋白表达。脑组织的组织形态与细胞活性变化用免疫荧光、固蓝/甲酚紫(LFB/CV)染色、H&E 染色、TUNEL 染色和 Fluoro-Jade C(FJC)染色评估;脑含水量用干湿重法测定。
测序与网络药理学。分析差异表达基因(DEGs)、KEGG 通路和 GO 数据,用来预测关键因子与相关通路。网络药理学用于挖掘 ESK 与 ICH 的共同靶点,并构建 ESK 治疗 ICH 靶点的蛋白互作网络。
统计。术中死亡或造模后不久死亡的小鼠不进入最终分析。正态性用 Shapiro–Wilk 检验。数据以 mean ± SD 表示。两组比较用非配对 t 检验;多时间点用重复测量方差分析加 Bonferroni 校正;多组比较用单因素方差分析加 Bonferroni 校正;非正态数据用 Friedman 或 Kruskal–Wallis 检验;死亡率用卡方检验。软件为 GraphPad Prism 9.5.0,显著性取 p < 0.05。
结果一:先定剂量,再看行为(精译)
动物死亡情况。本研究共用 323 只小鼠,其中 243 只接受了 ICH 手术。假手术组全部存活。原文写 ICH 小鼠的总死亡率为 8.36%(27/323)。
这里有个你应该当场停一下的地方:分母。323 只是“用过的全部小鼠”,真正接受 ICH 手术的是 243 只。27/323 恰好等于 8.36%,也就是说作者把分母写成了全部小鼠;如果换成 27/243,数字会变成约 11%。这不是翻译问题,是原文自己没对齐。你以后读到“mortality rate”时,先看它的分母是“所有动物”还是“造模动物”,两个数可以差出一倍。
造模与定剂量。作者向纹状体注射胶原酶 VII-S 造 ICH,用 LFB/CV 和 H&E 染色确认造模成功。与假手术组比,ICH 组在术后不同时间点都出现明显的神经功能损伤。作者排除了在啮齿类身上使用高于 40 mg/kg(急性或慢性)剂量的做法,理由是更高剂量或反复高剂量的 ESK 可能有麻醉、致幻和神经毒性作用。为定最佳剂量,造模后按固定时间点腹腔注射三个剂量(10、20、40 mg/kg),比较对体重和神经功能预后的影响:中间那个剂量(20 mg/kg)明显改善了 ICH 后的神经功能缺损、体重和行为表现,因此后续实验都用 20 mg/kg。
行为与病理。20 mg/kg 组相比溶剂对照(ICH + vehicle)组,体重、神经功能和行为学都有明显改善。FJC 和 TUNEL 染色显示,ESK 组的 FJC 阳性神经元数量明显少于溶剂组,说明神经损伤明显减少。对同侧纹状体的 NeuN、GFAP、NSE、MBP 做免疫荧光和 Western blot:同组内染色均匀;ICH 组表现为 NeuN、NSE、MBP 表达下降、GFAP 表达上升;治疗组则表现为 NeuN、GFAP、NSE、MBP 阳性细胞增多。
这四个蛋白分别是什么,讨论部分才交代清楚:NeuN 标记成熟神经元,NSE 是神经组织标志蛋白,MBP 是髓鞘的结构蛋白,GFAP 是星形胶质细胞的标志。GFAP 升高在这里被作者算作“好”,这一点你最好自己留个心眼——它同时也是胶质细胞被激活、胶质瘢痕形成的标志。
安全性,以及一个容易被跳过的阴性结果。为评价安全性,作者用同样方法给正常小鼠 20 mg/kg ESK,记录体重与神经、运动功能,未见毒副作用;肝、肾 H&E 染色、血常规以及肝肾功能相关生化指标在 20 或 40 mg/kg 下也未见不良影响。最后一句很关键:ICH + ESK20 组与 ICH + vehicle 组在损伤体积(mm3)和脑含水量(%)上没有显著差异。
也就是说,血肿没变小,水肿没减轻,但老鼠走得比之前好。这句话把整篇文章的性质定住了:它讲的是“神经元层面的保护”,不是“血肿清除”。很多脑出血论文的卖点恰恰是“血肿变小”,这篇不是。
结果二:把上千个差异基因缩成一条链(精译)
为弄清 ESK 在 ICH 中的神经保护机制,作者对血肿周围脑组织做了 RNA-seq。差异表达基因的筛选阈值是 log2|fold-change| > 1 且 Q 值 < 0.05。与 ICH + vehicle 组比,ICH + ESK20 组有 15 个基因显著改变。KEGG 通路分析提示富集到若干神经、炎症与免疫通路,例如 Ras、Rap1、PI3K/AKT 和 MAPK 信号通路。GO 分析在“细胞组分”上提示轴突、髓鞘和神经元胞体受累;在“生物学过程”上提示神经生长因子信号通路、神经发育、轴突导向、神经元发育、脑发育、神经系统发育等与神经再生相关的过程,以及神经生长因子受体结合。KEGG 通路与差异基因共表达分析提示:ESK 组里 NTF3 与 PI3K/AKT 通路的关联最突出。
网络药理学怎么“提名”。作者从 GeneCards、DrugBank 等数据库挖数据,找到 ESK 与 ICH 的 9 个共同靶点:BDNF、GRIN2B、GRIN1、NTRK2、CYP2C9、GRIN2A、CYP3A4、CYP2C19、CYP2B6。对这 9 个共同靶点做蛋白互作网络,发现若干高度相关的蛋白,其中包含测序得到的 NTF3。原文这句写得比较乱(“scores of 0.999 for BDNF, NTF3 with NTRK2, and 0.991 for BDNF with NTF3”缺了主宾),按上下文只能读成:BDNF 与 NTF3 之间、NTF3 与 NTRK2 之间的合并得分最高(0.999),BDNF 与 NTF3 之间另有 0.991 的高分(合并得分 ≥ 0.900/1 视为高置信)。随后的 KEGG 通路分析把神经营养因子通路排在最相关(FDRP < 0.01),PI3K/AKT 通路也显示强关联(FDRP < 0.01)。
分子对接。作者把 NTF3(黄色)作为受体、ESK(蓝色)作为配体,用 AutoDock 做对接。ESK 与 NTF3 的亲和力小于 −5 kcal/mol,说明结合比较稳定;相互作用主要靠氨基酸残基的疏水作用和 π–π 堆积,能形成稳定的空间构象。作者据此认为,网络药理学的结果与测序结果互相印证,并选定 NTF3 与 PI3K/AKT 通路作为后续实验的目标机制,同时把通路下游的 GSK3B 和 SGK1 作为神经损伤的指标一起测。
读到这里你该有的判断是:以上全部是“提名”阶段。测序给的是相关性,网络药理学给的是数据库交集的产物,对接给的是几何打分。三样加起来,仍然没有一个实验证明“ESK 在体内真的通过 NTF3 起作用”。真正的判决在下一节和再下一节。
结果三:NTF3 什么时候低、低在哪种细胞(精译)
确定了候选靶点和通路之后,作者回头查 NTF3 本身。用 Western blot 在术后 6、12 小时和第 1、3、7 天检测 ICH 小鼠脑组织里的 NTF3 蛋白:与假手术组比,ICH 组在术后第 3 天 NTF3 表达明显降低(p < 0.05)。对神经元和小胶质细胞做 NTF3 免疫荧光:术后第 3 天,ICH 组的 NTF3 蛋白表达明显低于假手术组。给 ESK 之后,细胞外基质里出现了弥散的 NTF3 蛋白,作者认为这可能与神经元内 NTF3 蛋白增加并释放有关。与小胶质细胞共染结果类似,但 NTF3 与小胶质细胞并不共定位。
用 STRING 数据库做蛋白互作分析,显示 BDNF、TrkB、TrkC 等蛋白与 NTF3 相互作用,并在 ICH 中起关键作用。作者用 Western blot 验证了这些与 NTF3 功能相关、且参与 ESK 治疗 ICH 通路的蛋白:与 NTF3 同家族的 BDNF,表达变化与 NTF3 一致;受体 TrkB 和 TrkC 的变化趋势与 NTF3 相似。作者据此推测 BDNF 可能与 NTF3 在这个过程里协同作用,它们的受体也可能很关键。
顺便给一个读英文的小提示:原文这里出现了一句 “The expression of the same family of star proteins, BDNF”,语法上是讲不通的(“star proteins”不是术语)。这类论文的英文并非母语写作,偶有句子经不起语法分析。遇到这种地方,正确的反应是“这句原文有问题”,而不是“我英语太差”。
结果四:两次“堵路”实验(精译)
第一次堵路:把 NTF3 敲低。作者用 AAV 在特定脑区沉默 NTF3 基因。感染 28 天后,该区域 NTF3 在 mRNA 和蛋白水平都明显改变,并筛出最优的 shRNA 序列(AAV-shRNA1);感染是否成功用带荧光的病毒做免疫荧光确认。结果显示,NTF3 被沉默后,ESK 对体重、神经功能和行为学的治疗作用明显减弱。Western blot 显示 PI3K/AKT 通路相关蛋白在 AAV-shRNA-NTF3 处理后明显变化:ICH + vehicle 组的 NTF3、PI3K、p-AKT、p-SGK1 明显低于假手术组;给 ESK 后,ICH + ESK20 组的 NTF3、PI3K、p-AKT、p-GSK3B、p-SGK1 明显升高;而用 AAV-ShNTF3 敲低 NTF3 之后,这些指标又明显下降。作者由此认为 NTF3 对 ESK 在 ICH 小鼠中的疗效至关重要,AAV-shRNA-NTF3 能抵消 ESK 的治疗作用。
这里需要一句提醒:原文写这一组对比时,把比较的方向写反了(字面意思是“ICH + ESK20 组低于 ICH + ESK20 + AAV-ShNTF3 组”)。按上下文和统计符号(^† 标的是“ESK20 + AAV-ShNTF3 vs ESK20”),作者想说的是“敲低组低于单给 ESK 组”。摘要里那句“感染 28 天后 ESK 显著增强神经保护”也是同一处笔误的余波。读论文时,图和符号往往比句子可靠。
第二次堵路:把通路压住。作者用 PI3K 抑制剂 LY294002 阻断 PI3K/AKT 通路。加了抑制剂再用 ESK,对体重、神经功能和行为学的治疗作用明显减弱。Western blot 显示:ICH + vehicle 组的 NTF3、PI3K、p-AKT、p-GSK3B、p-SGK1 明显低于假手术组;ESK 组这些指标明显升高;而在 ESK 基础上加 LY294002,这些指标又明显回落。作者由此认为 PI3K/AKT 通路对 ESK 在 ICH 小鼠中的神经保护作用是必需的,LY294002 能抑制这种作用。
两次堵路合起来才是这篇的论证骨架:一次堵在上游(把 NTF3 拿掉),一次堵在下游(把 PI3K 压住),结果都是“药还是那个药,效果没了”。这就是从“相关”走到“必要”的标准写法。
讨论与局限(精译)
作者先复述结论:最佳剂量的 ESK 减轻了 ICH 小鼠的神经损伤、减少了神经元死亡、改善了运动功能;ESK 治疗组血肿周围组织的 NeuN、NSE、MBP、GFAP 蛋白水平升高。测序与网络药理学把关键靶点指向 NTF3,GO 分析提示治疗组存在神经保护与神经修复相关的生物学过程,KEGG 分析揭示了 NTF3 的经典下游通路;实验验证了 PI3K/AKT 通路;通路内下游效应分子 GSK3B 与 SGK1 的显著磷酸化,说明 ESK 治疗组小鼠的脑神经处于被保护与被修复的状态。
然后是背景铺垫:2019 年 3 月 5 日,鼻喷剂型艾司氯胺酮(Spravato)获美国 FDA 批准用于治疗难治性抑郁,此后 ESK 在美国、英国和欧洲相继获批。ESK 的镇静、镇痛和神经保护作用近年受到相当多关注,已有多项研究报道其神经保护效应和相关机制通路。目前认为 ESK 的主要靶点是谷氨酸/NMDA 受体;其他已确认或可能的靶点包括 GRIN2B、EEF2、BDNF 以及 BDNF/NT-3 的受体(NTRK2,即 TrkB)。作者认为,研究这些关键靶点可以为 ESK 的潜在疗效与应用提供更多支持;他们用网络药理学预测并验证 ESK 与 ICH 的潜在靶点和通路,结果与本研究测序得到的证据一致。
关于四个标志物,作者逐个给了身份:NeuN 常用来识别和研究成熟神经元;MBP 是主要存在于中枢神经系统髓鞘中的结构蛋白,对神经冲动传导和轴突形成必不可少,而脑出血会破坏神经元髓鞘;GFAP 在中枢神经系统的星形胶质细胞中高表达,其表达可反映星形胶质细胞的反应,而星形胶质细胞参与损伤区的支持与修复以及 ICH 中的免疫调节;NSE 是神经组织的标志蛋白,主要存在于神经元和神经内分泌细胞,可反映神经元存活与轴突再生。作者认为这些蛋白的表达变化说明 ESK 通过分泌神经营养因子、促进神经元修复,推动了内源性神经细胞的存活与增殖。
关于机制细节:NTF3 结合 TrkB 和 TrkC 受体,激活 PI3K/AKT 通路,这条经典下游通路又进一步促进神经营养因子通路。GSK3B 是丝氨酸–苏氨酸激酶,属蛋白激酶家族;AKT 和 SGK1 通过激活并磷酸化 GSK3B 而充当其上游调控者;磷酸化的 GSK3B 调控众多细胞过程。SGK1 是 PI3K/AKT 通路上另一个关键下游分子,属 AGC 家族的蛋白激酶,调控细胞周期蛋白、凋亡抑制蛋白和细胞代谢。作者还提到,他们此前的研究证明 BDNF 对保护 ICH 后的感觉运动功能、减轻抑郁与焦虑样行为和认知损害必不可少。
关于 ESK 的临床背景,作者给了两个数字:在 ESK 组里约一半患者达到缓解,到第 32 周有三分之二的患者对治疗有反应;临床报告还显示 ESK 可用于脊柱侧弯矫正术后镇痛、剖宫产中的镇痛镇静,以及围手术期急性术后疼痛管理。抑郁和疼痛都是 ICH 常见的合并问题:ICH 除了造成偏瘫等运动障碍,还可能带来抑郁或疼痛症状,明显拖累患者的生活质量。因此作者提出,用 ESK 处理 ICH 相关的疼痛或抑郁,是未来值得做的方向。
局限。作者自己列了三条:①研究只用了成年雄性小鼠,年龄和性别带来的差异没有探讨;②虽然 40 mg/kg 未影响神经功能、肝肾功能或行为,20 mg/kg 以上也未见到毒副作用,但临床上 ESK 过量有分离感、头晕、恶心、镇静、眩晕、感觉延迟、嗜睡、醉酒感等不良反应报道,ESK 还可能在一定范围内升高血压(有研究显示低剂量 ESK 可缓解丙泊酚麻醉引起的低氧和低血压、稳定血流动力学),所以未来临床应用必须密切监测;③研究限于动物模型,疗效还需临床研究验证。
结论一句话:ESK 在 ICH 后发挥神经保护作用,这些作用可能与神经细胞再生和轴突修复有关,NTF3/PI3K/AKT 通路在其中起关键作用,因此 ESK 在 ICH 及其他神经退行性疾病的治疗上可能有临床潜力。
这篇在轨迹里的位置
把王俊阳 2024–2026 的发表按时间排开,这一篇是最靠“手”的一端。
| 年份 | 期刊 | 方向 | 作者位次 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | CNS Neurosci Ther | 艾司氯胺酮治疗小鼠脑出血(本页) | 7/14 |
| 2025 | CNS Neurosci Ther | 鼻内 rIL-10 在脑出血后的分布 | 16/20 |
| 2025 | J Neurochem | 缺血性卒中患者 TCR 免疫组库 | 3/12 |
| 2025 | Transl Psychiatry | 精神分裂症特异的剪接 QTL(02 页) | 5/7 |
| 2025 | BMC Med | rs1950834–LRFN5 与抑郁障碍(03 页) | 8/14 |
| 2026 | Nat Commun | 1p36.23 变异经 RERE 影响精神分裂症风险 | 2/16(共同第一) |
| 2026 | J Extracell Vesicles | C1qc 迁移体 | 10/18 |
2024 年他在 CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics 有两篇:这一篇艾司氯胺酮(14 位作者里排第 7),和一篇鼻内 rIL-10 在脑出血后分布的研究(2025 年同刊,20 位作者里排第 16)。到 2025 年,语言突然换了:J Neurochem 上缺血性卒中患者的 TCR 免疫组库(12 人里第 3)、Translational Psychiatry 上精神分裂症特异的剪接 QTL(7 人里第 5)、BMC Medicine 上 rs1950834 与 LRFN5(14 人里第 8)。2026 年更进一步:Nature Communications 上 1p36.23 变异经 RERE 影响精神分裂症风险(16 人里第 2,共同第一作者),以及 J Extracell Vesicles 上的 C1qc 迁移体(18 人里第 10)。
这一篇是那条线的起点,但它的“起点”身份有点特别:作者贡献声明里,他被列在“起草、编辑和修改稿件”那一组(与 Xihua Lu、Ting Zhao、Nan Li、Qiang Li、王君敏、王建同列),做实验和取数据的是牛晓宇、郑圆圆、王旺、王少帅。也就是说,在这篇里他最先接触的不是移液枪,是稿子。这几乎是本科生进组最标准的入口:先跟着读、跟着改,再慢慢摸到台面上。
这篇把什么往前推了一格?它给的是一套完整的“药物 → 靶点 → 通路”叙事模板:定剂量、看行为、测序提名、两次堵路验证。你后面读到的那些遗传学论文,其实用的是同一个骨架,只是把“给药”换成了“换碱基”,把“行为学”换成了“eQTL 和 MR”。所以这一页值得当成模板记住:任何一篇机制论文,你都可以问它四件事——剂量怎么定的、表型是什么、提名靠什么、验证堵了哪两头。
下一篇接着做的(02 页那篇 sQTL)是完全相反的方向:没有一只老鼠,全是人和数据库,问题也从“这个药有没有用”变成“这个碱基在谁的脑子里、通过哪种剪接起作用”。一个人能同时站在两端,这在本科阶段不多见,也是这条轨迹最值得看的地方。
给刚进组的你
先做一件很小的事:把这篇的图 1F(行为学)和图 5C(敲低 NTF3 后的行为学)并排放在一起看。两张图的纵轴是同一套测试,回答的却是两个不同的问题——一张问“药有没有用”,一张问“把靶点拿掉以后药还有没有用”。你在组会上被问到“这个药到底是不是通过这个分子起效”时,答案永远在第二张图里。
可以问师姐三个具体的问题:①咱们组现在的 FJC 和 TUNEL 是自己染还是送出去做?②AAV 打进去要等 28 天,这一个月老鼠怎么养、怎么保证不脱标?③跑 p-AKT 的时候,你们是跟总 AKT 一起跑还是分开跑?这三个问题都能立刻得到可操作的答案,比问“我该读什么”有用得多。
另外,去 WB 的图里找一次“p-某蛋白 / 总某蛋白”这一对。你会看到很多论文只给一个磷酸化条带,不给总量;这篇给了 PI3K、p-AKT、p-GSK3B、p-SGK1,但注意它没有给出总 AKT 与总 GSK3B 的完整对照。这不是要你挑错,是要你养成习惯:看到“通路被激活”,先问“激活的是磷酸化比例,还是总蛋白量”。
最后一句建议:读这类论文,从“结果”的最后一小节和“讨论”的第一段开始读。前者告诉你它最后靠什么把话说圆,后者告诉你作者自己认为最重要的一句是什么。中间那一大段测序和对接,等你需要复现的时候再细看。
▲ 本部分翻译难点(对照学习用)
附录 · 英文原文
Esketamine Provides Neuroprotection After Intracerebral Hemorrhage in Mice via the NTF3/PI3K/AKT Pathway
Abstract
Esketamine (ESK), a noncompetitive antagonist of N‐methyl‐D‐aspartate (NMDA) receptors, modulates neurotransmitter signaling in the central nervous system. However, the specific mechanisms and therapeutic potential of ESK for intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) remain unclear. This study aimed to investigate whether ESK promotes nerve repair and improves neurological outcomes in an experimental model of ICH.
ICH was induced in mice via collagenase injection into the striatum. Body weight, neurological impairment, and behavioral changes were assessed. ESK administration significantly improved several indicators of ICH. Comprehensive RNA transcriptome sequencing and network pharmacology analyses identified neurotrophin‐3 (NTF3) and the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway as targets for ESK treatment. Western blotting and immunofluorescence detected the protein expression levels and cellular localization of NTF3.
After 28 days of adeno‐associated virus infection in the mouse striatum, ESK treatment significantly enhanced neuroprotection, indicating the crucial role of NTF3 in ESK‐mediated neuroprotection in ICH mice. Inhibition of the PI3K/AKT pathway using the PI3K‐specific inhibitor LY294002 significantly attenuated the therapeutic effects of ESK, suggesting that this pathway is involved in ESK‐mediated neurorepair in ICH mice.
ESK treatment significantly improved functional outcomes and demonstrated neuroprotective effects in animal models of ICH. NTF3/PI3K/AKT pathway activation by ESK indicates its therapeutic potential in the treatment of ICH.
Keywords: esketamine, intracerebral hemorrhage, neuroprotection, NTF3, PI3K/AKT signaling pathway
Introduction
Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is a type of cerebral injury caused by the acute extravasation of blood into the brain parenchyma due to the rupture of a cerebral artery. It affects approximately 2.9 million people worldwide each year [[1]]. In the United States, ICH affects approximately 80,000 people annually, accounting for about 10%–15% of all strokes [[2]]. Despite recent preclinical and clinical trials, no treatment has significantly improved mortality or neurological outcomes after ICH. Therefore, new therapeutic approaches are urgently needed to enhance patient prognosis and promote post‐stroke rehabilitation and recovery.
Esketamine (ESK), an azocyclic compound and the S‐isomer of ketamine, is widely used as an analgesic, soothing, and anesthetic. As a potent N‐methyl‐D‐aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist, ESK plays a crucial role in the central nervous system, producing rapid sedative anesthetic effects through its action on glutamate receptors [[3], [4]]. Several studies have reported ESK's neuroprotective effects [[5], [6]]. However, its potential clinical applications, notably its neuroprotective role in ICH, remain underexplored.
Neurotrophin‐3 (NTF3 and NT‐3) is a member of the neurotrophic factor family. Nerve growth factors are prototypical members of this family and promote sympathetic and sensory neuron survival during development [[7]]. NTF3 performs several physiological functions in the nervous system, including neuronal survival and development, synaptic plasticity, nerve injury repair, and anti‐inflammatory and neuroprotective effects [[8]]. Increased NTF3 was shown to have a protective effect on cells and rats of ICH in a delivery system study [[9]].
As an NTF3‐mediated downstream pathway, the PI3K/AKT pathway is an important signaling pathway involved in various cellular processes, including cell proliferation, survival, differentiation, and metabolism [[10]]. PI3K phosphorylates multiple substrate proteins, such as glycogen synthase kinase 3 beta (GSK3B) and serum glucocorticoid‐regulated kinase 1 (SGK1), through the activation of protein kinase B (AKT). Several studies have shown that the PI3K/AKT pathway is closely associated with ICH [[11], [12], [13]].
We hypothesized that NTF3 activation promotes PI3K/AKT‐mediated neurotrophy‐related pathways after ICH and aimed to explore the functional role of ESK in ICH mice in this study.
Materials and Methods
Detailed information is provided in the, including animal groups (Figure and Table) and statistical analysis (Table).
Animals
Male C57BL/6 mice (8–10 weeks; 20–30 g). All animal experiments were approved by the Animal Care Committee of Zhengzhou University (approval number: ZZUIRB 2022‐31), and we followed the updated ARRIVE (Animal Research: Reporting of In Vivo Experiments) 2.0 guidelines [[14], [15]].
ICH Mouse Model
Under stereotactic guidance, the mouse ICH model was established by injecting 0.075 U collagenase VII‐S into the right striatum. Mice in the sham group were injected with an equivalent volume of normal saline [[16]]. After randomization, ESK (Hengrui; Jiangsu, China; 50 mg/2 mL), LY294002 (MCE, USA; 10 nmol/2 μL or 8 mg/kg), and adeno‐associated virus (AAV2/9‐U6‐shRNANTF3‐WPRE; 2 μL; 1 × 1013 V.G/mL) were administered at appropriate dosages, routes, and times.
Weight and Behavioral Tests
Body weight was measured and recorded at fixed time points. The body weight ratio (%) was calculated as (body weight at a fixed time point/initial body weight) × 100%. Neurological function was assessed using the neurological deficit score, rotarod test, beam walking test, and grid walking test [[17]]. After ICH, behavioral assessments were conducted to determine the optimal drug dose on Days 1, 3, 7, and 14. To evaluate the effects on motor and neurological function following the acute phase of ICH, assessments were conducted on Days 1, 3, and 7 after ICH.
Molecular and Histological Analyses
Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was used to detect AAV infection, and western blotting was used to assess protein expression. Histomorphological and cell activity changes in the brain were evaluated using immunofluorescence, Luxol fast blue/cresyl violet (LFB/CV) staining, hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining, terminal uridine nucleotide end labeling (TUNEL) staining, and Fluoro‐Jade C (FJC) staining. Brain water content was quantified using the dry‐wet method [[14], [18]].
Transcriptome Sequencing and Network Pharmacology Validation
Differentially expressed genes (DEGs), Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathways, and Gene Ontology (GO) data were analyzed to predict key factors and related pathways. Network pharmacology validation was used to mine ESK with ICH targets and construct a protein interaction network of ICH targets for ESK therapy.
Blood Sample Analysis
Blood samples from mice were evaluated to measure drug toxicity and related indices.
Statistical Analysis
Mice that died during surgery or shortly after ICH induction were excluded from the final analysis. The normality of data distribution was assessed using the Shapiro–Wilk test. Data are expressed as mean ± standard deviation. Unpaired t‐tests were used for comparisons between the two groups. Repeated‐measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) with Bonferroni post hoc correction was applied to data collected at different time points across groups. One‐way ANOVA with Bonferroni post hoc correction was used to compare multiple groups, while the Friedman or Kruskal–Wallis test was employed for non‐normally distributed data. Mortality rates were compared using the chi‐squared test. Statistical analyses were conducted with GraphPad Prism 9.5.0 (GraphPad Software, San Diego, CA, USA). Statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.
Results
Animal Mortality
A total of 323 mice were used in this study, of which 243 underwent ICH surgery. All mice in the sham group survived. The overall mortality rate of the mice with ICH was 8.36% (27/323) (Table).
Construction of the ICH Model and Determination of the Optimal Drug Dose
We constructed an ICH model by injecting collagenase VII‐S into the striatum of mice and assessed the success using LFB/CV and H&E staining (Figure). Compared to the sham group, mice in the ICH group showed significant neurological damage at different time points after surgery. We excluded in vivo studies in rodents at doses higher than 40 mg/kg (acute or chronic), due to the potential anesthetic, psychotomimetic, and neurotoxic effects of ESK at higher or repeated high doses [[19]]. To determine the optimal dosage, three doses of ESK (10, 20, and 40 mg/kg) were injected intraperitoneally at fixed times after ICH to assess their effects on body weight and neurological prognosis in ICH mice. The middle dose (20 mg/kg) significantly improved neurological deficits, body weight, and behavioral performance after ICH (Figure). Therefore, we used 20 mg/kg as the optimal dose for subsequent experiments.
[FIGURE 1] ESK treatment attenuates weight loss and improves neurological and motor function in mice with ICH. (A) ICH was induced in C57BL/6 mice via collagenase injection into the right striatum. (B) Different groups of brain water content on Day 3 after ICH and brain injury volume measurement according to Luxol fast blue/cresyl violet (LFB/CV) staining (n = 6). (C) Representative brain sections stained with LFB/CV and hematoxylin and eosin. (D) Body weight ratio. (E) Neurological deficit score. (F) Behavioral assessments using the rotarod test, beam walking test, and grid walking test. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01: ICH + vehicle versus sham; # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01: ICH + ESK20 versus ICH + vehicle (n = 6). All data are mean ± SD.
ESK Reduces Nerve Damage and Improves Motor Function After ICH in Mice
At a dose of 20 mg/kg, there was a significant improvement in body weight, neurological function, and behavioral changes in the ICH + ESK20 group compared to the ICH + vehicle group (Figure). FJC and TUNEL staining revealed that the number of FJC‐positive neurons was significantly lower in the ICH + ESK20 group than in the ICH + vehicle group, indicating a significant reduction in nerve injury (Figure). Immunofluorescence and western blot analysis of NeuN, glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), neuron‐specific enolase (NSE), and myelin basic protein (MBP) in the ipsilateral striatum showed uniform staining in the same group. In contrast, the ICH group exhibited decreased expression of NeuN, NSE, and MBP, and increased expression of GFAP (Figure). The treatment group, however, showed increased NeuN‐, GFAP‐, NSE‐, and MBP‐positive cells (Figure). Western blot results corroborated these findings, showing higher NeuN, NSE, and MBP expression in the sham group (Figure). The protein expression levels of NeuN, GFAP, NSE, and MBP were significantly higher in the ICH + ESK20 group than in the ICH + vehicle group. To evaluate the safety of ESK, we administered 20 mg/kg ESK to normal mice using the same method and recorded body weights, as well as neurological and motor functions, to confirm that ESK at this dose did not produce toxic side effects. These studies showed that a 20 mg/kg dose of ESK did not have any adverse effects (Figure). Additionally, liver and kidney H&E staining, routine blood tests, and relevant liver and kidney biochemical indices of the dosed mice revealed no adverse effects of ESK at doses of 20 or 40 mg/kg (Figure and Tables and). Finally, the results showed that there was no significant difference in injury volume (mm3) or brain water content (%) between the ICH + ESK20 and ICH + vehicle groups (Figure).
[FIGURE 2] ESK treatment reduces neuronal degeneration and death while increasing the protein expression of NeuN, GFAP, NSE, and MBP in mice subjected to ICH. (A) Representative images of Fluoro‐Jade C staining in the perihematomal region 72 h after ICH (n = 3). (B) Representative images of TUBEL staining in the perihematomal region at 72 h after ICH (n = 3). (C) Western blot analysis of NeuN, GFAP, NSE, and MBP protein expression, showing representative bands (n = 4), *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 versus sham; # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01 versus ICH + vehicle. (D) Immunofluorescence images of NeuN, GFAP, NSE, and MBP in the perihematomal region of mouse brain tissue after ICH (n = 3). Scale bar: 100 μm.
Transcriptome Sequencing Reveals Key Genes and Pathways in ESK‐Treated ICH Mice
To gain a deeper understanding of the neuroprotective mechanism of ESK in ICH, we performed RNA‐seq to sequence the mRNA transcriptome of brain tissue surrounding the hematoma in the experimental and control groups. Transcriptome sequencing revealed that 15 genes were significantly altered in the ICH + ESK20 group compared with the ICH + vehicle group (Figure and Table). KEGG pathway analysis suggested the enrichment of several important neurological, inflammatory, and immune pathways involved, such as the Ras, Rap1, PI3K/AKT, and MAPK signaling pathways (Figures and). GO analysis suggested the involvement of the axon, myelin sheath, and neuronal cell body in “Cellular Components” and differential gene regulation in “Biological Processes” including the nerve growth factor signaling pathway, nerve development, axon guidance, neuron development, brain development, nervous system development, and other processes related to neural regeneration and nerve growth factor receptor binding. (Figure). KEGG pathway and differential gene coexpression analyses suggested that the association of NTF3 with the PI3K/AKT pathway was most relevant in the ICH + ESK20 group compared with the ICH + vehicle group (Figure).
[FIGURE 3] ESK treatment alters the gene transcription profile induced by ICH, with network pharmacology predicting possible target pathway interactions involved. (A) Histogram of differentially expressed genes (DEGs) comparing ICH + ESK20 vs. ICH + vehicle groups). Volcano plots show selected pairwise comparisons. DEGs were identified based on log2 |fold‐change| > 1 and Q‐value < 0.05. Heatmap of the cluster analysis illustrates transcript expression levels of DEGs in ICH groups on Day 3 after treatment with ESK or vehicle. The color scale indicates relative expression levels: red represents level above the mean, and green represents levels below the mean. (B) KEGG pathway enrichment bubble map, where a larger −log10 (p‐value) indicates a greater degree of enrichment. (C) Network of significantly enriched KEGG pathways altered by ESK treatment. Squares represent related pathways, circles represent DEGs, and darker colors indicate stronger correlations. (D) Venn diagram showing putative targets of ESK and ICH‐related genes, with a protein–protein interaction network illustrating interactions among target genes. Circle size indicates the target protein degree value. (E) Pathway enrichment analysis. (F) Molecular docking analysis predicts the binding of ESK to NTF3, showing hydrophobic interactions and π–π stacking with NTF3 residues that form a stable spatial conformation.
Network Pharmacological Analysis Indicates the Feasibility and Significance of Key Molecules and Associated Pathways
We used network pharmacology to predict and validate ESK related targets and pathways for ICH treatment. Data mining from GeneCards, DrugBank, and other databases revealed nine common targets between ESK and ICH: BDNF, GRIN2B, GRIN1, NTRK2, CYP2C9, GRIN2A, CYP3A4, CYP2C19, and CYP2B6 (Figure). Protein–protein interaction network analysis of these common targets revealed several significantly associated proteins, including NTF3, which we sequenced, with scores of 0.999 for BDNF, NTF3 with NTRK2, and 0.991 for BDNF with NTF3 (combined score), which showed the highest confidence (combined score ≥ 0.900 out of 1) (Figures and). Subsequent KEGG pathway analysis ranked the neurotrophic factor pathway as the most associated (FDRP < 0.01), with the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway also showing strong association (FDRP < 0.01) (Figure and Table). Molecular docking also provides a reference for understanding the relationship between drugs and their target proteins. NTF3 (yellow) served as the molecular docking acceptor. Molecular docking of the receptor proteins was performed using AutoDock software for the ligand, ESK (blue). The affinity of ESK for the receptor protein NTF3 was less than −5 kcal/mol, indicating that the binding was more stable. The results showed that the interaction between ESK and NTF3 occurred mainly through hydrophobic interactions and π–π stacking of amino acid residues, which could form a stable spatial conformational structure. Network pharmacology validation reinforced the sequencing results and confirmed the drug's mechanism of action (Figure). These findings suggest that ESK activates molecules, pathways, and functions related to neuroregeneration and neuroprotection following ICH. Based on this comprehensive analysis, we used NTF3 and the PI3K/AKT pathway as the target mechanism in our subsequent experiment. The downstream molecules GSK3B and SGK1, which play vital roles in the PI3K/AKT pathway, were also used as indicators of neurological damage and recovery following ICH.
[FIGURE 4] Time course of NTF3 protein levels and cellular localization after ICH. (A) Representative Western blot results and quantitative analyses of temporal changes in NTF3 expression in the ipsilateral hemisphere after ICH (n = 4). *p < 0.01 versus sham. (B) Representative images of double immunofluorescence staining showing colocalization of NTF3 (green) with neurons (NeuN, red) or microglia (Iba1, red) in the perihematomal region of ICH + vehicle and ICH + ESK20 groups, and the corresponding region in the sham group, at 72 h after ICH (n = 3). Scale bar: 100 μm. (C) NTF3‐related protein interaction network map, with circles representing proteins and lines, indicating verified interactions by different methods. (D) Correlation analysis between proteins. Scores range from 0 to 1, with higher scores associated with greater correlations. (E) Representative Western blot bands and quantitative analyses of the expression of key proteins associated with NTF3 function (n = 4). **p < 0.01 versus sham; # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01 versus ICH + vehicle.
Expression and Localization of NTF3 in ICH
After identifying the potential target molecules and pathways for ESK in the treatment of ICH, we further explored the role of NTF3. We detected the protein expression of NTF3 in the brain tissue of ICH mice using Western blotting at 6 and 12 h, and on the first, third, and seventh day after surgery. NTF3 expression was significantly lower on the third day after ICH in the ICH group compared to the sham group (p < 0.05; Figure). Immunofluorescence staining for NTF3 in neurons and microglia showed a significant decrease in NTF3 protein expression on the third‐day post‐ICH in the ICH group compared to the sham group. After ESK treatment, diffuse NTF3 protein expression appeared in the extracellular matrix, potentially related to an increase and release of NTF3 protein from neurons (Figure). Costaining with microglia showed similar results, although NTF3 was not colocalized with microglia (Figure). Protein–protein interaction analysis using the STRING database demonstrated that proteins such as BDNF, TrkB, and TrkC interact with NTF3 and play critical roles in ICH (Figure). We confirmed these interactions by analyzing the expression of proteins related to NTF3's role and its involvement in the pathway associated with ESK treatment of ICH using western blotting. The expression of the same family of star proteins, BDNF, was consistent with that of NTF3. The receptors, TrkB and TrkC, showed trends similar to NTF3. These findings suggest that BDNF may play a synergistic role with NTF3 in this process, and their receptors may also play a critical role (Figure).
Effect of AAV‐shRNA‐NTF3 on ESK Treatment
We silenced the NTF3 gene using AAV infection in specific brain regions of the mice. After 28 days of infection, NTF3 expression in these regions was significantly altered at both mRNA and protein levels, and the optimal shRNA sequence (AAV‐shRNA1) was identified (Figure). Infection success was assessed by detecting fluorescence‐carrying viruses using immunofluorescence (Figure). The results showed that the therapeutic effects on body weight, neurological function, and behavior were significantly reduced in mice treated with ESK following NTF3 silencing with AAV (**p < 0.01: ICH + vehicle vs. sham; # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01: ICH + ESK20 vs. ICH + vehicle; † p < 0.05, †† p < 0.01: ICH + ESK20 + AAV‐ShNTF3 vs. ICH + ESK20), (Figure). Western blotting revealed significant alterations in PI3K/AKT pathway‐related proteins levels after AAV‐shRNA‐NTF3 treatment. NTF3, PI3K, p‐AKT, and p‐SGK1 protein expression levels were significantly lower in the ICH + vehicle group than in the sham group (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01; Figure). Following ESK treatment, the expression levels of NTF3, PI3K, p‐AKT, p‐GSK3B, and p‐SGK1 were significantly higher in the ICH + ESK20 group than in the ICH + vehicle group (## p < 0.01; Figure), while NTF3 knockdown with AAV‐ShNTF3 resulted in significantly lower expression levels of NTF3, PI3K, p‐AKT, p‐GSK3B, and p‐SGK1 in the ICH + ESK20 group compared to the ICH + ESK20 + AAV‐ShNTF3 group († p < 0.05, †† p < 0.01, Figure). These results suggest that NTF3 is critical to the beneficial effects of ESK in ICH mice and that AAV‐shRNA‐NTF3 can impede ESK treatment.
[FIGURE 5] Effects of AAV treatment on body weight and neurological and motor function on Days 1, 3, and 7 after ICH in mice. (A) Body weight ratio. (B) Neurological deficit score. (C) Behavioral assessments (rotarod test, beam walking test, and grid walking test). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01: ICH + vehicle versus sham; # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01: ICH + ESK20 versus ICH + vehicle; † p < 0.05, †† p < 0.01: ICH + ESK20 + AAV‐ShNTF3 versus ICH + ESK20 (n = 6). (D) In each group, Western blot bands and analysis of NTF3, PI3K, p‐AKT, p‐GSK3B, and p‐SGK1 protein expression (n = 4). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 versus sham; ## p < 0.01 versus ICH + vehicle; † p < 0.05, †† p < 0.01 versus ICH + ESK20.
PI3K Inhibitor, LY294002, Blocks ESK in ICH Mice
We used the PI3K inhibitor, LY294002, to block the PI3K/AKT pathway. The therapeutic effects on body weight, neurological function, and behavior were significantly diminished in mice treated with the inhibitor, followed by ESK treatment (**p < 0.01: ICH + vehicle vs. sham; # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01: ICH + ESK20 vs. ICH + vehicle; † p < 0.05, †† p < 0.01: ICH + ESK20 + LY294002 vs. ICH + ESK20; Figure). Western blotting showed that PI3K/AKT pathway‐related protein levels were significantly altered following LY294002 treatment. Protein expression levels of NTF3, PI3K, p‐AKT, p‐GSK3B, and p‐SGK1 were significantly lower in the ICH + vehicle group than in the sham group (*p < 0.05, **p < 0.01; Figure). After ESK treatment, the expression levels of NTF3, PI3K, p‐AKT, p‐GSK3B, and p‐SGK1 were significantly higher in the ICH + ESK20 group than in the ICH + vehicle group (# p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01; Figure); while these levels were significantly lower in the ICH + ESK20 + LY294002 group compared to the ICH + ESK20 group († p < 0.05, †† p < 0.01, Figure). These results suggest that the PI3K/AKT pathway is essential for the neuroprotective effects of ESK in ICH mice and that LY294002 can inhibit these effects.
[FIGURE 6] Effects of LY294002 treatment on body weight and neurological and motor function on Days 1 and 3 after ICH in mice. (A) Body weight ratio. (B) Neurological deficit score. (C) Behavioral assessments (rotarod test, beam walking test, and grid walking test). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01: ICH + vehicle versus sham; # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01: ICH + ESK20 versus ICH + vehicle; † p < 0.05, †† p < 0.01: ICH + ESK20 + LY294002 versus ICH + ESK20 (n = 6). (D) Results and analyses of each group's Western blot of NTF3, PI3K, p‐AKT, p‐GSK3B, and p‐SGK1 protein expression (n = 4). *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 versus sham; # p < 0.05, ## p < 0.01 versus ICH + vehicle; † p < 0.05, †† p < 0.01 versus ICH + ESK20.
Discussion
In this study, we found that the optimal dose of ESK reduced nerve damage, decreased neuronal cell death, and improved motor function in mice with ICH. NeuN, NSE, MBP, and GFAP protein expression levels were increased in the perihematomal tissue of ICH mice treated with ESK. Subsequent transcriptome sequencing and network pharmacology analyses identified a key target, NTF3. GO analysis suggested that “Biological Processes” of neuroprotection and neurorepair may exist in the ESK treatment group. KEGG pathway analysis also revealed the classical downstream pathway of NTF3. This PI3K/AKT pathway was experimentally validated to highlight the critical role of the NTF3 and PI3K/AKT signaling pathways in ESK treatment. The significant phosphorylation of the downstream effector molecules, GSK3B and SGK1, within the activated PI3K/AKT signaling pathway, indicated that the cerebral nerves of mice with ICH in the ESK treatment group were protected and repaired.
Since the nasal spray, esketamine (Spravato), was approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for treating treatment‐resistant conditions on March 5, 2019, ESK has been approved in the United States, the United Kingdom, and Europe [[20], [21]] The sedative, analgesic, and neuroprotective effects of ESK have gained considerable interest in recent years [[19]]. Several studies have reported on the neuroprotective effects of ESK and its associated mechanistic pathways [[22], [23]]. Current studies have shown that the primary target of ESK is the glutamate/NMDA receptor (Protein Group) [[24]]. Other currently confirmed or potential targets of ESK includeGRIN2B [[25]], EEF2 [[25]], BDNF [[25], [26]], and the BDNF/NT‐3 receptor (NTRK2, TrkB) [[25], [26]]. Investigating these key targets may provide additional support for the potential efficacy and application of ESK. We also predicted and validated potential targets and pathways of ESK and ICH using network pharmacology, and the results were consistent with the evidence obtained from sequencing in the present study.
NeuN is commonly used as a marker to identify and study mature neuronal cells [[27]]. MBP is a structural protein mainly present in the myelin sheath of the central nervous system and is essential for nerve impulse conduction and axonal formation; cerebral hemorrhage destroys neuronal myelin [[28]]. GFAP is highly expressed in astrocytes in the central nervous system, and its expression can reflect the response of astrocytes, which are involved in supporting and repairing damaged areas and in immune regulation in ICH [[29]]. NSE is a hallmark protein of neural tissue, primarily present in neurons and neuroendocrine cells, and can indicate neuronal survival and axonal regeneration [[22]]. The expression levels of these specific proteins (NeuN, NSE, MBP, and GFAP) were further analyzed using western blotting and immunofluorescence staining, suggesting that ESK promotes the survival and proliferation of endogenous neural cells through the secretion of neurotrophic factors and neuronal repair.
As a member of the neurotrophin family, NTF3 plays a significant role in various processes, including nerve repair and regeneration, neuroprotection, and anti‐inflammation following neurological injury [[8], [30], [31]]. NTF3 binds to TrkB and TrkC receptors, activating the PI3K/AKT pathway. This canonical downstream signaling pathway further promotes the neurotrophin pathway [[32]]. The PI3K/AKT pathway has emerged as a critical focus for investigating the pathogenesis, treatment, and prognosis of ICH [[33], [34], [35]]. BDNF, another neurotrophin family number closely associated with the NTF3 and PI3K/AKT pathways, is also critical for neuronal development, growth, differentiation, and maintenance, including in studies on ICH [[36]]. Our previous research demonstrated that BDNF is essential for protecting sensorimotor function, and alleviating depression, anxiety‐like behaviors, and cognitive impairment after ICH [[15], [37]]. This study also suggests a strong association between NTF3 and BDNF, both of which have potential synergistic and reciprocal effects and may play a role in neuroprotection against ICH. In this study, we examined the changes in BDNF, PI3K, and p‐AKT protein levels at different time points after ICH using western blotting (Figure).
GSK3B is a serine–threonine kinase that belongs to the protein kinase family [[38]]. AKT and SGK1 are known to act as upstream regulators of GSK3B by activating and phosphorylating it [[39]]. Phosphorylated GSK3B regulates numerous cellular processes. SGK1, another key downstream molecule in the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway, is a protein kinase belonging to the AGC family that regulates cyclins, apoptosis suppressor proteins and cell metabolism, cyclins, apoptosis suppressor proteins, and cell metabolism [[40]]. In our study, we examined the colocalization and fluorescence of NeuN and Iba1 with GSK3B, SGK1, p‐GSK3B, and p‐SGK1 in each study group on the day after ICH. Numerous studies have explored the roles of GSK3B and SGK1 in ICH, and the identification of NTF3, PI3K/AKT, and their downstream effector molecules can provide insights for further research on potential therapeutic targets or combination therapies for ICH (Figure).
ESK has recently emerged as a novel antidepressant. Approximately half of the patients in the ESK group achieved remission, and two‐thirds responded to treatment by Week 32, underscoring the significance of ESK in treating treatment‐resistant depression [[41]]. Clinical reports have demonstrated the analgesic effects of ESK for pain relief following scoliosis correction [[42]], analgesia and sedation during cesarean section [[43]], and perioperative acute postoperative pain management [[3]]. Depression and pain are common complications associated with ICH. In addition to causing hemiplegia or other motor impairments, ICH may lead to symptoms of depression or pain, imposing a significant burden on patients' quality of life [[44], [45]]. In this study, ESK improved mouse neurological function and mobility after ICH and exerted a neuroprotective effect. Thus, the potential use of ESK for treating ICH‐related pain or depression is a promising direction for future research, potentially broadening its application to a larger patient population with secondary conditions following ICH [[46]].
Our study was limited to adult male mice; therefore, potential differences in the effects of ICH and ESK based on age and sex were not explored. Additionally, our findings showed that a dose of 40 mg/kg did not affect neurological function, liver or kidney pathology, or behavior in mice. ESK at doses of at least 20 mg/kg did not cause any toxic side effects in mice, as indicated by routine blood tests and biochemical assessments of liver and kidney function. However, several side effects of ESK overdose have been reported in clinical practice, including dissociation, dizziness, nausea, sedation, vertigo, sensory delay, somnolence, and feelings of intoxication [[47], [48]]. ESK may also elevate blood pressure within a certain range. Studies have shown that low‐dose ESK can alleviate hypoxia and hypotension induced by propofol anesthesia in patients and stabilize hemodynamics [[49]]. Therefore, careful monitoring of patients is necessary to ensure medication safety in future clinical applications. As this study was limited to animal models, further clinical research is required to validate its therapeutic efficacy.
Conclusions
We confirm that ESK exerts neuroprotective effects following ICH. These effects may be associated with neural cell regeneration and axonal repair, with the NTF3/PI3K/AKT pathway playing a crucial role in this process. Therefore, ESK may have potential clinical applications in treating ICH and other neurodegenerative diseases.
Author Contributions
Changsheng Li and Jian Wang designed and conceived the study. Xiaoyu Niu, Changsheng Li, and Jian Wang wrote the manuscript. Xiaoyu Niu, Yuanyuan Zheng, Wang Wang, and Shaoshuai Wang performed the experiments and acquired the data. Xiaoyu Niu and Liwei Zhang conducted a bioinformatics analysis. Xiaoyu Niu, Yuanyuan Zheng, and Gaiqing Yang analyzed the data and edited the figures. Xihua Lu, Ting Zhao, Nan Li, Junyang Wang, Qiang Li, Junmin Wang, and Jian Wang drafted, edited, and revised the manuscript. All authors approved the final article.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Supporting information
Acknowledgments
This work was partially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant 10.13039/501100001809); Key Technology Research and Development Program of He'nan Educational Committee (Grant 222102310190); He'nan Provincial Health Commission Science and Technology Innovation Leading Talent Project (Grant XYKC2020010); and China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant GZC20232436).
Contributor Information
Jian Wang, Email: jianwang2020@outlook.com.
Changsheng Li, Email: lihan159@126.com.
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
Associated Data
Supplementary Materials
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.